Interpersonal synchrony – the tendency for social partners to temporally co-ordinate their behaviour when interacting – is a ubiquitous feature of social interactions. Synchronous interactions play a key role in development, and promote social bonding and a range of pro-social behavioural outcomes across the lifespan. The process of achieving and maintaining interpersonal synchrony is highly complex, with inputs required from across perceptual, temporal, motor, and socio-cognitive domains. In this conceptual analysis, we synthesise evidence from across these domains to establish the key components underpinning successful non-verbal interpersonal synchrony, how such processes interact, and factors that may moderate their operation. We also consider emerging evidence that interpersonal synchrony is reduced in autistic populations. We use our account of the components contributing to interpersonal synchrony in the typical population to identify potential points of divergence in interpersonal synchrony in autism. The relationship between interpersonal synchrony and broader aspects of social communication in autism are also considered, together with implications for future research.
Interpersonal synchrony (IS) is the temporal co-ordination of behavior during social interactions. IS acts as a social cue signifying affiliation, both when children witness IS between others and when they experience it themselves. However, it is unclear which temporal qualities of IS produce these effects, and why. We hypothesized that the simultaneity and temporal regularity of partners’ actions would each influence affiliation judgements, and that subjective perceptions of IS (‘togetherness’) would play a role in mediating these relations. In two online studies, children aged 4-11 years listened to a pair of children tapping together (witnessed IS; N=68) or themselves tapped with another child (experienced IS; N=63). Tapping partners were presented as real but were virtual. The simultaneity and regularity of their tapping was systematically manipulated across trials. For witnessed IS, both the simultaneity and regularity of partners’ tapping significantly positively affected the perceived degree of affiliation between them. These effects were mediated by the perceived togetherness of the tapping. No affiliative effects of IS were found in the experienced IS condition. Our findings suggest that both the simultaneity and regularity of partners’ actions influence children’s affiliation judgements when witnessing IS, via elicited perceptions of togetherness. We conclude that temporal interdependence – which includes but is not limited to simultaneity of action – is responsible for inducing perceptions of affiliation during witnessed IS.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.