Population control of the house mouse (Mus musculus), Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus) and black rat (Rattus rattus) is common practice worldwide. Our objective was to assess the impact on animal welfare of lethal and non-lethal control methods, including three dispatch methods. We used the Sharp and Saunders welfare assessment model with eight experts scoring eleven control methods and three dispatch methods used on the three species. We presumed the methods were performed as prescribed, only taking into account the effect on the target animal (and not, for example, on non-target catches). We did not assess population control efficacy of the methods. Methods considered to induce the least suffering to the target animal were captive-bolt traps, electrocution traps and cervical dislocation, while those with the greatest impact were anticoagulants, cholecalciferol and deprivation. Experts indicated considerable uncertainty regarding their evaluation of certain methods, which emphasises the need for further scientific research. In particular, the impact of hydrogen cyanide, chloralose and aluminium phosphide on animal welfare ought to be investigated. The experts also stressed the need to improve Standard Operating Procedures and to incorporate animal welfare assessments in Integrated Pest Management (IPM). The results of our study can help laypeople, professionals, regulatory agencies and legislators making well-informed decisions as to which methods to use when controlling commensal rodents.

Stray cat population management is an important worldwide issue. Understanding citizen attitudes towards stray cat control options is vital to the success of controlling stray cat numbers, as public perception affects the acceptance of, support for and collaboration in stray cat management policies. Audience segmentation, as to enable each group to be engaged in the stray cat management policy, is important for the success of the interventions. Therefore a web-based survey was conducted among Flemish citizens in order to examine differences in acceptance towards seven management scenarios: household cat neutering with financial support for the owner, household cat neutering without financial support for the owner, encouraging responsible household cat ownership, trapping stray cats and taking them to a shelter, trapping and neutering stray cats for release into a managed "cat colony" (composed by so called "community cats"), trapping and killing of stray cats, and undertaking no action. A total of 4059 valid responses were collected and the proportions of agreement were compared across the different management scenarios using the two-sample z-test. Interactions among factors that influenced each management scenario were investigated using the CHAID (Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detection) analysis and visualized on a tree.Our results showed that fostering responsible household cat ownership (89.9%) and conversion of stray cats to "community cats" (76.3%) were most supported by respondents in our sample (which consisted mainly of females, cat-lovers, and families without children). Least supported were the killing of stray cats (7.7%) and undertaking no action (3.3%). The demographic analyses revealed that for the acceptance of management scenarios there were three important factors (attitude towards cats, area of residence, and gender), two weaker factors (education and having children) and two which had almost no impact (age and cat ownership). We propose that future studies should focus on the effect of 'area of residence', 'having children' and 'education'.In conclusion, our research confirms that management of and communication on stray cat strategies should not be developed with a one-size-fits-all approach. Efforts should be tailored to each audience segment, thus adapted to the area of residence and human characteristics.

No abstract

De kennis van en de opvattingen over mens en dier veranderen doorheen de tijd. De zoektocht naar wat de mens typeert en verschillend maakt van dieren is van bij aanvang bepalend. In de Griekse oudheid legde Aristoteles, met zijn Scala naturæ, de basis voor een antropocentrisch denken over dieren. Het fundamentele verschil dat verondersteld wordt te bestaan tussen mens en dier is een leidend principe. De kerkvaders eigenden zich het denken van Aristoteles toe, waardoor ze het hiërarchische denken in relatie tot dieren verder verspreidden en versterkten in de westerse wereld. Dit eerste deel van het voorliggend tweeledig artikel eindigt met hoe Montaigne in de zestiende eeuw de hiërarchie van Aristoteles opnieuw in vraag stelde, terwijl Descartes enkele decennia later dieren nog voorstelde als puur mechanische constructies.

Van de veertiende tot midden negentiende eeuw vonden twee belangrijke verschuivingen plaats in het denken over dieren. Enerzijds werd het theologisch antropocentrisch denken stap voor stap door wetenschappelijke inzichten verlaten en werd de mens onttroond. Met de ontwikkeling van de evolutieleer vond anderzijds een belangrijke paradigmaverschuiving plaats: de verwantschap van de mens met andere dieren werd duidelijk. Van toen af aan nam de zoektocht naar gelijkenissen een dominante positie in. Meer en meer waarde werd gehecht aan de gevoelens van dieren en dierenrechten werden naar voren gebracht.