In recent years, some electrophysiological analysis methods of consciousness have been proposed. Most of these studies are based on visual interpretation or statistical analysis, and there is hardly any work classifying the level of consciousness in a deep coma. In this study, we perform an analysis of electroencephalography complexity measures by quantifying features efficiency in differentiating patients in different consciousness levels. Several measures of complexity have been proposed to quantify the complexity of signals. Our aim is to lay the foundation of a system that will objectively define the level of consciousness by performing a complexity analysis of Electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. Therefore, a nonlinear analysis of EEG signals obtained with a recording scheme proposed by us from 39 patients with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) between 3 and 8 was performed. Various entropy values (approximate entropy, permutation entropy, etc.) obtained from different algorithms, Hjorth parameters, Lempel–Ziv complexity and Kolmogorov complexity values were extracted from the signals as features. The features were analyzed statistically and the success of features in classifying different levels of consciousness was measured by various classifiers. Consequently, levels of consciousness in deep coma (GCS between 3 and 8) were classified with an accuracy of 90.3%. To the authors’ best knowledge, this is the first demonstration of the discriminative nonlinear features extracted from tactile and auditory stimuli EEG signals in distinguishing different GCSs of comatose patients.
“Coma” is defined as an inability to obey commands, to speak, or to open the eyes. So, a coma is a state of unarousable unconsciousness. In a clinical setting, the ability to respond to a command is often used to infer consciousness. Evaluation of the patient’s level of consciousness (LeOC) is important for neurological evaluation. The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) is the most widely used and popular scoring system for neurological evaluation and is used to assess a patient’s level of consciousness. The aim of this study is the evaluation of GCSs with an objective approach based on numerical results. So, EEG signals were recorded from 39 patients in a coma state with a new procedure proposed by us in a deep coma state (GCS: between 3 and 8). The EEG signals were divided into four sub-bands as alpha, beta, delta, and theta, and their power spectral density was calculated. As a result of power spectral analysis, 10 different features were extracted from EEG signals in the time and frequency domains. The features were statistically analyzed to differentiate the different LeOC and to relate with the GCS. Additionally, some machine learning algorithms have been used to measure the performance of the features for distinguishing patients with different GCSs in a deep coma. This study demonstrated that GCS 3 and GCS 8 patients were classified from other levels of consciousness in terms of decreased theta activity. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to classify patients in a deep coma (GCS between 3 and 8) with 96.44% classification performance.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.