Adventitious rooting (AR) is a multifactorial response leading to new roots at the base of stem cuttings, and the establishment of a complete and autonomous plant. AR has two main phases: (a) induction, with a requirement for higher auxin concentration; (b) formation, inhibited by high auxin and in which anatomical changes take place. The first stages of this process in severed organs necessarily include wounding and water stress responses which may trigger hormonal changes that contribute to reprogram target cells that are competent to respond to rooting stimuli. At severance, the roles of jasmonate and abscisic acid are critical for wound response and perhaps sink strength establishment, although their negative roles on the cell cycle may inhibit root induction. Strigolactones may also inhibit AR. A reduced concentration of cytokinins in cuttings results from the separation of the root system, whose tips are a relevant source of these root induction inhibitors. The combined increased accumulation of basipetally transported auxins from the shoot apex at the cutting base is often sufficient for AR in easy-to-root species. The role of peroxidases and phenolic compounds in auxin catabolism may be critical at these early stages right after wounding. The events leading to AR strongly depend on mother plant nutritional status, both in terms of minerals and carbohydrates, as well as on sink establishment at cutting bases. Auxins play a central role in AR. Auxin transporters control auxin canalization to target cells. There, auxins act primarily through selective proteolysis and cell wall loosening, via their receptor proteins TIR1 (transport inhibitor response 1) and ABP1 (Auxin-Binding Protein 1). A complex microRNA circuitry is involved in the control of auxin response factors essential for gene expression in AR. After root establishment, new hormonal controls take place, with auxins being required at lower concentrations for root meristem maintenance and cytokinins needed for root tissue differentiation.

No abstract

No abstract

Adventitious roots (ARs) form from above-ground organs, and auxins are major regulators of AR development. TIR1/AFB F-box proteins act as well-established auxin receptors. Auxin transport involves the PINFORMED (PIN) auxin efflux carriers and AUXIN RESISTANT 1/LIKE AUX1 (AUX1/LAX1) influx carriers. To further elucidate the basis of AR development, we investigated the participation of these proteins and phosphorylation of PINs during adventitious rooting in hypocotyls of pre-etiolated flooded Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings. Mutant and GUS localization studies indicated that AFB2 is important in AR development. AUX1 loss-of-function reduced AR numbers, which could not be reversed by exogenous auxin. Single mutations in LAX1, LAX2 and LAX3 had no negative impact on AR development and the first and last mutations even promoted it. Double and triple mutants of AUX1, LAX1, LAX2 and LAX3 significantly reduced rooting, which was reversed by exogenous auxin. AUX1 was essential in AR establishment, with LAX3 apparently acting in conjunction. Proper phosphorylation of PINs by PID, WAG1 and WAG2 and auxin transport direction were equally essential for AR establishment. PIN1, AUX1 and AFB2 (overexpression) and LAX1, LAX3, PIN4 and PIN7 (downregulation) emerged as potential targets for genetic manipulation aiming at improving AR development.

Plant development is highly affected by light quality, direction, and intensity. Under natural growth conditions, shoots are directly exposed to light whereas roots develop underground shielded from direct illumination. The photomorphogenic development strongly represses shoot elongation whereas promotes root growth. Over the years, several studies helped the elucidation of signaling elements that coordinate light perception and underlying developmental outputs. Light exposure of the shoots has diverse effects on main root growth and lateral root (LR) formation. In this study, we evaluated the phenotypic root responses of wild-type Arabidopsis plants, as well as several mutants, grown in a D-Root system. We observed that sucrose and light act synergistically to promote root growth and that sucrose alone cannot overcome the light requirement for root growth. We also have shown that roots respond to the light intensity applied to the shoot by changes in primary and LR development. Loss-of-function mutants for several root light-response genes display varying phenotypes according to the light intensity to which shoots are exposed. Low light intensity strongly impaired LR development for most genotypes. Only vid-27 and pils4 mutants showed higher LR density at 40 μmol m–2 s–1 than at 80 μmol m–2 s–1 whereas yuc3 and shy2-2 presented no LR development in any light condition, reinforcing the importance of auxin signaling in light-dependent root development. Our results support the use of D-Root systems to avoid the effects of direct root illumination that might lead to artifacts and unnatural phenotypic outputs.

No abstract

No abstract

Graphical abstract