Background The Oncotype DX breast recurrence score has been introduced more than a decade ago to aid physicians in determining the need for systemic adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early-stage, estrogen receptor (ER)+, lymph node-negative breast cancer. Methods In this study, we utilized data from The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program to investigate temporal trends in Oncotype DX usage among US breast cancer patients in the first decade after the introduction of the Oncotype DX assay. Results We found that the use of Oncotype DX has steadily increased in the first decade of use and that this increase is associated with a decreased usage of chemotherapy. Patients who utilized the Oncotype DX test tended to have improved survival compared to patients who did not use the assay even after adjusting for clinical variables associated with prognosis. In addition, chemotherapy usage in patients with high-risk scores is associated with significantly longer overall and breast cancer-specific survival compared to high-risk patients who did not receive chemotherapy. On the contrary, patients with low-risk scores who were treated with chemotherapy tended to have shorter overall survival compared to low-risk patients who forwent chemotherapy. Conclusion We have provided a comprehensive temporal overview of the use of Oncotype DX in breast cancer patients in the first decade after Oncotype DX was introduced. Our results suggest that the use of Oncotype DX is increasing in ER+ breast cancer and that the Oncotype DX test results provide valuable information for patient treatment and prognosis.

Motivation In recent years, several experimental studies have revealed that the microRNAs (miRNAs) in serum, plasma, exosome and whole blood are dysregulated in various types of diseases, indicating that the circulating miRNAs may serve as potential noninvasive biomarkers for disease diagnosis and prognosis. However, no database has been constructed to integrate the large-scale circulating miRNA profiles, explore the functional pathways involved and predict the potential biomarkers using feature selection between the disease conditions. Although there have been several studies attempting to generate a circulating miRNA database, they have not yet integrated the large-scale circulating miRNA profiles or provided the biomarker-selection function using machine learning methods. Results To fill this gap, we constructed the Circulating MicroRNA Expression Profiling (CMEP) database for integrating, analyzing and visualizing the large-scale expression profiles of phenotype-specific circulating miRNAs. The CMEP database contains massive datasets that were manually curated from NCBI GEO and the exRNA Atlas, including 66 datasets, 228 subsets and 10 419 samples. The CMEP provides the differential expression circulating miRNAs analysis and the KEGG functional pathway enrichment analysis. Furthermore, to provide the function of noninvasive biomarker discovery, we implemented several feature-selection methods, including ridge regression, lasso regression, support vector machine and random forests. Finally, we implemented a user-friendly web interface to improve the user experience and to visualize the data and results of CMEP. Availability and implementation CMEP is accessible at http://syslab5.nchu.edu.tw/CMEP.

To improve cancer precision medicine, prognostic and predictive biomarkers are critically needed to aid physicians in deciding treatment strategies in a personalized fashion. Due to the heterogeneous nature of cancer, most biomarkers are expected to be valid only in a subset of patients. Furthermore, there is no current approach to determine the applicability of biomarkers. In this study, we propose a framework to improve the clinical application of biomarkers. As part of this framework, we develop a clinical outcome prediction model (CPM) and a predictability prediction model (PPM) for each biomarker and use these models to calculate a prognostic score (P-score) and a confidence score (C-score) for each patient. Each biomarker’s P-score indicates its association with patient clinical outcomes, while each C-score reflects the biomarker applicability of the biomarker’s CPM to a patient and therefore the confidence of the clinical prediction. We assessed the effectiveness of this framework by applying it to three biomarkers, Oncotype DX, MammaPrint, and an E2F4 signature, which have been used for predicting patient response, pathologic complete response versus residual disease to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (a classification problem), and recurrence-free survival (a Cox regression problem) in breast cancer, respectively. In both applications, our analyses indicated patients with higher C scores were more likely to be correctly predicted by the biomarkers, indicating the effectiveness of our framework. This framework provides a useful approach to develop and apply biomarkers in the context of cancer precision medicine.

To improve cancer precision medicine, prognostic and predictive biomarkers are critically needed to aid physicians in deciding treatment strategies in a personalized fashion. Due to the heterogeneous nature of cancer, most biomarkers are expected to be valid only in a subset of patients. Furthermore, there is no current approach to determine the applicability of biomarkers. In this study, we propose a framework to improve the clinical application of biomarkers. As part of this framework, we develop a clinical outcome prediction model (CPM) and a predictability prediction model (PPM) for each biomarker and use these models to calculate a prognostic score (P-score) and a confidence score (C-score) for each patient. Each biomarker’s P-score indicates its association with patient clinical outcomes, while each C-score reflects the biomarker applicability of the biomarker’s CPM to a patient and therefore the confidence of the clinical prediction. We assessed the effectiveness of this framework by applying it to three biomarkers, Oncotype DX, MammaPrint, and an E2F4 signature, which have been used for predicting patient response, pathologic complete response versus residual disease to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (a classification problem), and recurrence-free survival (a Cox regression problem) in breast cancer, respectively. In both applications, our analyses indicated patients with higher C scores were more likely to be correctly predicted by the biomarkers, indicating the effectiveness of our framework. This framework provides a useful approach to develop and apply biomarkers in the context of cancer precision medicine.