Background:The concurrent presence of lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin, and anti β2-glycoprotein I antibodies (triple positive profile) identifies patients at high risk of thromboembolic events. These patients are also positive for anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies (tetra-positive profile).Objective: Understand which antibody among anti-β2-glycoprotein I and anti-phosphatidyl-serine/prothrombin is responsible for lupus anticoagulant activity.Patients/Methods: Affinity purified anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies from plasma of 14 tetra-positive patients spiked into normal pooled plasma were tested. Results and Conclusions:Anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies did not prolong the diluted Russell viper venom time and silica clotting time (median ratio 0.98, interquartile ratio[IQR] 0.9-1.06; and 1.0, IQR 0.91-1.03, respectively). Anticoagulant activity remained in the flow-through that was deprived of anti-β2 glycoprotein I antibodies (median ratio 1.88, IQR 1.58-2.77; and 1.75, IQR 1.17-2.9, respectively). This material was loaded on size-exclusion chromatography Sephacryl S-300 column and showed that anticoagulant activity and anti-phosphatidyl-serine/prothrombin antibodies coeluted in the same fractions. Besides, the flow through was poured into a prothrombin affinity column. Protein yield in three patients ranged from 54 to 91 μg/mL and showed strong positivity in phosphatidyl-serine/prothrombin ELISA. The affinity purified material prolonged the coagulation time of normal pooled plasma: the diluted Russell viper venom ratio in the three patients was 2.09, 1.21, and 1.35; that of silica clotting time was 2.05, 1.5, and 2.13. In conclusion, under the assay conditions used, anticoagulant activity in tetra-positive antiphospholipid syndrome patients may largely be attributable to anti-phosphatidyl-serine/prothrombin antibodies.

Background: Serum anti-heart autoantibodies (AHA) and anti-intercalated disk autoantibodies (AIDA) are autoimmune markers in myocarditis. In arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) myocarditis has been reported. To provide evidence for autoimmunity, we searched for AHA and AIDA in ARVC. Methods: We studied: 42 ARVC probands, 23 male, aged 42, interquartile range (IQR) 33;49, 20 from familial and 22 non-familial pedigrees; 37 clinically affected relatives (AR), 24 male aged 35, IQR 18;46; 96 healthy relatives (HR), 49 male, aged 27, IQR 17;45. Serum AHA and AIDA were tested by indirect immunofluorescence on human myocardium and skeletal muscle in 171 of the 175 ARVC individuals and in controls with: non-inflammatory cardiac disease (NICD) (n=160), ischemic heart failure (IHF) (n=141), normal blood donors (NBD) (n=270). Screening of five desmosomal genes was performed in probands; when a sequence variant was identified, cascade family screening followed, blind to immunological results. Results: AHA frequency was higher (36.8%) in probands, AR (37.8%) and HR (25%) than in NICD (1%), IHF (1%) or NBD (2.5%) (p=0.0001). AIDA frequency was higher in probands (8%, p=0.006), in AR (21.6%, p=0.00001) and in HR (14.6% p=0.00001) than in NICD (3.75%), IHF (2%) or NBD (0.3%). AHA positive status was associated with higher frequency of palpitation (p=0.004), ICD implantation (p=0.021), lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (p=0.004), AIDA positive status with both lower RV and LVEF (p=0.027 and p=0.027 respectively). AHA and/or AIDA positive status in the proband and/or at least one of the respective relatives was more common in familial (17/20, 85%) than in sporadic (10/22, 45%) pedigrees (p=0.007). Conclusions: Presence of AHA and AIDA provides evidence of autoimmunity in the majority of familial and in almost half of sporadic ARVC. In probands and in AR these antibodies were associated with disease severity features; longitudinal studies are needed to clarify whether they may predict ARVC development in HR or if they be a result of manifest ARVC.

Outcome predictors in myocarditis are not well defined; we aimed at identifying predictors of death, heart transplantation (HTx) and relapse before the introduction of immunosuppression.

No abstract

No abstract

Background: Sarcoidosis is an immune-mediated disease. Cardiac involvement, a granulomatous form of myocarditis, is under-recognized and prognostically relevant. Anti-heart autoantibodies (AHAs) and anti-intercalated disk autoantibodies (AIDAs) are autoimmune markers in nonsarcoidosis myocarditis forms. Objective: The aim was to assess serum AHAs and AIDAs as autoimmune markers in cardiac sarcoidosis. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study on AHA and AIDA frequency in: 29 patients (aged 46 ± 12, 20 male) with biopsy-proven extracardiac sarcoidosis and biopsy-proven or clinically suspected and confirmed by 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and/or cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) cardiac involvement; 30 patients (aged 44 ± 11, 12 male) with biopsy-proven extracardiac sarcoidosis without cardiac involvement (no cardiac symptoms, normal 12-lead electrocardiogram, echocardiography and CMR), and control patients with noninflammatory cardiac disease (NICD) (n = 160), ischemic heart failure (IHF) (n = 141) and normal blood donors (NBDs) (n = 270). Sarcoidosis patients were recruited in two recruiting tertiary centers in the USA and Italy. AHAs and AIDAs were detected by indirect immunofluorescence on the human myocardium and skeletal muscle. Results: AHA and AIDA frequencies were higher in sarcoidosis with cardiac involvement (86%; 62%) than in sarcoidosis without cardiac involvement (0%; 0%), NICD (8%; 4%), IHF (7%; 2%) and NBD (9%; 0%) (p = 0.0001; p = 0.0001, respectively). Sensitivity and specificity for cardiac sarcoidosis were 86% and 92% for positive AHAs and 62% and 98% for positive AIDAs, respectively. AIDAs in cardiac sarcoidosis were associated with a higher number of involved organs (p = 0.04). Conclusions: Serum AHAs and AIDAs provide novel noninvasive diagnostic autoimmune markers for cardiac sarcoidosis.

No abstract

Lupus anticoagulant is a misnomer as it is commonly associated with thromboembolic events. In few cases, the name retains its literal meaning when it characterizes patients with a bleeding disorder. We describe a patient with lupus anticoagulant, hypoprothrombinemia, and major bleeding (lupus anticoagulant/hypoprothrombinemia syndrome). Immunological studies revealed a huge amount of circulating monoclonal immunoglobulin M lambda (IgMλ) antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies (14,400 U/mL). Affinity purified monoclonal antibodies (440 U/mL) prolonged the coagulation time of normal plasma by 12.2 seconds (diluted Russell viper venom time) and 25.5 seconds (silica clotting time). The original patient's plasma mixed 1:1 with normal plasma showed a marked prolongation of coagulation times (lupus cofactor) from a ratio of 2.94 to 5.23 in diluted Russel viper venom time and from 2.30 to 3.00 using the silica clotting time. Human prothrombin added to original patient's plasma caused a marked prolongation of coagulation times in diluted Russell viper venom test thus unequivocally explaining the lupus cofactor phenomenon. In conclusion, we have shown that lupus anticoagulant/hypoprothrombinemia syndrome is attributable to monoclonal IgMλ antibodies directed to phosphatidylserine/prothrombin and that prothrombin is the protein responsible for the observed lupus cofactor phenomenon.