Introduction. Parkinson’s disease cannot be well treated by conventional medication. Acupuncture and Tai Chi are proven to be effective in relieving symptoms of Parkinson’s disease. Traditional Chinese medicine exercises may prove to be an effective complementary therapy. Objective. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of conduction exercise and self-acupressure in treating Parkinson’s disease. Method. This study is an accessor- and data analyzer-blind, add-on, randomized, controlled, pilot clinical study. In the treatment group, they were taught to practice conduction exercise and self-acupressure for 8 weeks. No additional treatment was given in the control group. Assessments were done at week 4 and week 8 of the treatment period. The primary outcomes are the total score and domain scores of the Chinese version of 39-item Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire. The secondary outcomes are the total score and domain scores of a custom-designed questionnaire, which is a short form of Nonmotor Symptom Scale. Results. 22 patients in the treatment group and 14 in the control group continued to the treatment phase. Patients in the treatment group displayed improvement trends in primary and secondary outcomes. Improvements were significant in two areas of a custom-designed questionnaire: total score (p=0.014) and domain score of gastrointestinal tract (p=0.004). No severe adverse events were reported. Conclusion. Conduction exercise and self-acupressure were well accepted by and feasible for Parkinson’s disease patients. The data generated can be used for the planning of future studies. The exercise regime can be promoted as a home-based, self-practice therapy for Parkinson’s disease patients, due to its safety, low cost, and convenience in implementation. This study is registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR-IPR-17011987, on 14 July 2017).
Background:Conventionally, patients with RA have been managed by scheduled routine consultations by rheumatologists every 3 to 6 months. However, the burden of RA has been increasing globally. Altough rheumatology nursing consultation was shown to be an effectiveness management strategy in western countries, its feasibility has not been evaluated in Chinese population. Therefore, we would like to compare the efficacy of rheumatology nursing consultation with usual rheumatologist follow-up in Hong Kong.Objectives:To evaluate the efficacy of rheumatology nursing consultation in patients with stable RA over 1 year.Methods:Study design and patient selection: This is a single centre, randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial conducted in Queen Mary Hospital. Patients with RA were recruited from the rheumatology clinic in Queen Mary Hospital. Subjects have to fulfill the 2010 ACR-EULAR classification criteria for RA, with DAS28-CRP≤3.2 for at least 6 months with no increase in dose of conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). Subjects with systemic manifestation of RA, current malignancies or current use of biologic therapies were excluded.Intervention:Subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the following treatment groups.Usual rheumatologist follow-up (control): Subjects were followed up by rheumatologists or registrars every 4 months. The treatment target was to maintain the DAS28-CRP≤3.2.Rheumatology nursing consultation: Subjects were followed up by the rheumatology nurses every 4 months. At 12 months, all subjects will be reviewed by a senior rheumatologist. The treatment target was to maintain the DAS28-CRP≤3.2.Outcomes:The primary outcome was the difference in proportion of subjects who remained to have DAS28-CRP≤3.2 at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included the difference in proportion of subjects with DAS28-CRP>0.6 at 12 months; the change in modified Sharp score, health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) score, patients’ drug compliance from baseline and patients' satisfaction at 12 months.Statistical analysis:SPSS v.22 was used to performed the statistical analyses according to intention to treat and per protocol analysis. The comparisons between 2 groups was performed by Student’s t-test for continuous variables and chi-square test for categorical variables. A one-way repeated measures ANOVA was conducted to determine if there was a difference in DAS28-CRP between treatment groups during the study period.Results:276 subjects were randomized to receive rheumatology nurse consultation or usual rheumatologist follow-up. At 12 months, 95.5% and 90.5% of subjects in the nurse consultaton and rheumatologist follow-up remained to have low disease activity respectively, with an adjusted treatement difference of 5.0% (CI -1.27–11.54) and showed non-inferiority with a pre-defined margin of -10%. However, more subjects in the rheumatologist follow-up experienced DAS28-CRP>0.6 at 12 months. One-way repeated measures ANOVA test showed significant difference in DAS28-CRP between 2 treatem...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.