Approximately 70% of EBV-positive NPC expressed PD-L1, but this did not correlate with patient survival or clinicopathologic features. The findings of this study represent the immune biomarker profile of confirmed EBV-associated NPC in an endemic region. Since the current clinical development of immune checkpoint inhibitor for NPC is mostly focusing on an EBV-associated tumor, differences in immune biomarker profiles and EBV status of endemic and nonendemic regions should be further explored.

No abstract

Recent publications have reported stereotactic radiosurgery as an effective and safe treatment for intracranial hemangioblastomas. However, because of the low incidence of these particular tumors, reports on large patient number studies have not yet been available. The objective of this study was to analyze the clinical results of 14 patients with 56 intracranial hemangioblastomas treated with linear accelerator (linac)-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and radiotherapy (SRT) in the same institute. The median age of patients was 41 years (range, 28–73 years). Nine of the patients (64%) had von Hippel-Lindau disease. A total of 39 lesions (70%) were treated with CyberKnife (CK), and 17 lesions (30%) were treated with X-Knife. The median pretreatment volume was 0.26 cm3 (range, 0.026–20.4 cm3). The median marginal dose was 20 Gy (range, 10–32 Gy) in 1 fraction (range, 1–10 fractions). The median follow-up time was 24 months (range, 11–89 months). At the last follow-up, 47 tumors (84%) were stable, 7 (13%) decreased and 2 (4%) increased. The 1-, 2- and 6-year local control rates were 98%, 88% and 73%, respectively. No radiation complications were observed in this study. There was a trend toward local failure only in cystic tumors, but this trend was not found to be statistically significant. SRS/SRT achieved a high local control rate in intracranial hemangioblastomas without radiation-induced complications.

PurposeThe aim was to investigate the advantages of dosiomic and radiomic features over traditional dose-volume histogram (DVH) features for predicting the development of radiation pneumonitis (RP), to validate the generalizability of dosiomic and radiomic features by using features selected from an esophageal cancer dataset and to use these features with a lung cancer dataset.Materials and MethodsA dataset containing 101 patients with esophageal cancer and 93 patients with lung cancer was included in this study. DVH and dosiomic features were extracted from 3D dose distributions. Radiomic features were extracted from pretreatment CT images. Feature selection was performed using only the esophageal cancer dataset. Four predictive models for RP (DVH, dosiomic, radiomic and dosiomic + radiomic models) were compared on the esophageal cancer dataset. We further used a lung cancer dataset for the external validation of the selected dosiomic and radiomic features from the esophageal cancer dataset. The performance of the predictive models was evaluated by the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROCAUC) and the AUC of the precision recall curve (PRAUC) metrics.ResultThe ROCAUCs and PRAUCs of the DVH, dosiomic, radiomic and dosiomic + radiomic models on esophageal cancer dataset were 0.67 ± 0.11 and 0.75 ± 0.10, 0.71 ± 0.10 and 0.77 ± 0.09, 0.71 ± 0.11 and 0.79 ± 0.09, and 0.75 ± 0.10 and 0.81 ± 0.09, respectively. The predictive performance of the dosiomic- and radiomic-based models was significantly higher than that of the DVH-based model with respect to esophageal cancer. The ROCAUCs and PRAUCs of the DVH, dosiomic, radiomic and dosiomic + radiomic models on the lung cancer dataset were 0.64 ± 0.18 and 0.37 ± 0.20, 0.67 ± 0.17 and 0.37 ± 0.20, 0.67 ± 0.16 and 0.45 ± 0.23, and 0.68 ± 0.16 and 0.44 ± 0.22, respectively. On the lung cancer dataset, the predictive performance of the radiomic and dosiomic + radiomic models was significantly higher than that of the DVH-based model. However, the PRAUC of the dosiomic-based model showed no significant difference relative to the corresponding RP prediction performance on the lung cancer dataset.ConclusionThe results suggested that dosiomic and CT radiomic features could improve RP prediction in thoracic radiotherapy. Dosiomic and radiomic feature knowledge might be transferrable from esophageal cancer to lung cancer.

Stereotactic radiation technique including single fraction radiosurgery and conventional fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy is widely reported as an effective treatment of pituitary adenomas. Because of the restricted radiation tolerance dose of the optic pathway, single fraction radiosurgery has been accepted for small tumor located far away from the optic apparatus, while fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy may be suitable for larger tumor located close to the optic pathway. More recently, hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy has become an alternative treatment option that provides high rate of tumor control and visual preservation for the perioptic lesions within 2 to 3 mm of the optic pathway. The objective of the study was to analyze the clinical outcomes of perioptic pituitary adenomas treated with hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. From 2009 to 2012, 40 patients with perioptic pituitary adenoma were treated with CyberKnife robotic radiosurgery. The median tumor volume was 3.35 cm (range, 0.82-25.86 cm). The median prescribed dose was 25 Gy (range, 20-28 Gy) in 5 fractions (range, 3-5). After the median follow-up time of 38.5 months (range, 14-71 months), 1 (2.5%) patient with prolactinoma had tumor enlargement, 31 (77.5%) were stable, and the remaining 8 (20%) tumors were smaller in size. No patient's vision deteriorated after hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. Hormone normalization was observed in 7 (54%) of 13 patients. No newly developed hypopituitarism was detected in our study. These data confirmed that hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy achieved high rates of tumor control and visual preservation. Because of the shorter duration of treatment, it may be preferable to use hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy over fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for selected pituitary adenomas immediately adjacent to the optic apparatus.

Background: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a common malignancy in Asia. Infection by human papilloma virus (HPV) has been recognized as an etiological risk for HNSCC, especially oropharyngeal region. While the association between HPV and HNSCC has been well evaluated in Western countries, only a few investigated the HPV-associated HNSCC in Southeast Asia. This study evaluated the prevalence, the characteristics, and the impact of HPV on the treatment outcomes in Thai HNSCC patients. Methods: Non-nasopharyngeal HNSCC patients treated at Ramathibodi Hospital during 2007-2013 were identified through the cancer registry database. Baseline patient, treatment data and survivals were retrospectively reviewed. The formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue sections were retrieved for p16 analysis. The HPV status was determined by p16 immunohistochemistry. The survival outcomes were analyzed in cases which p16 status was confirmed. Results: Total of 200 FFPE tissues of HNSCC patients was evaluated for p16 expression. Positive p16 status was observed in 24 cases (12%); majority of p16-positive were men (20:4 cases). The oropharynx (37.9%) was the most common site found in p16-positive while oral cavity (3.2%) was the least common site. Interestingly, 66.7% of p16 -positive were former/current smokers, and 70.8% of this subgroup was categorized as clinical AJCC stage III-IV. The p16-positive HNSCC was significantly superior in 5-year overall survival [5-yrs OS 63% vs. 40%, p=0.03], 5-year disease-free survival [5-yrs DFS 61% vs. 36%, p=0.03] and in 5-year locoregional relapse-free survival [5-yrs LRFS 93% vs. 68%, p=0.018] when compared with p16 -negative. Conclusions: In comparison to the results from the Western countries, the prevalence of HPV-related HNSCC in Thai patients was less, and differences in some characteristics were observed. Nevertheless, improvement in OS, DFS and LRFS were observed in p16 -positive patients. Our analyses suggested that p16 status is also a strong prognostic marker for HNSCC patients in Thailand.

No abstract

Platinum/5-fluorouracil (PF) is commonly used for chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced esophageal and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) cancers. Weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel (CP) regimen for preoperative CRT has increased in popularity due to its potentially less toxicity. We retrospectively compared the tolerability and efficacy of these regimens. Patients with esophageal and EGJ squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) or adenocarcinoma who received CRT with curative intent were included. Safety and tolerability during CRT were evaluated using the CTCAE version 4.0. Efficacy was analyzed using pathologic complete response, disease-free survival, and overall survival. One hundred and twenty-four patients were eligible for analysis (CP = 64, PF = 60). Most patients had esophageal cancer (97%) with SCC histology (91%). Preoperative CRT was planned for 43% of patients in the CP group and 34% in the PF group (p = 0.306). The relative dose intensities of cisplatin (67.0%) and 5-fluorouracil (81.4%) were lower than those of carboplatin (86.6%) and paclitaxel (86.2%). No difference in the radiotherapy dose, hospitalization, interruption, or termination was observed between the groups. Dose reduction of chemotherapy was more frequent in the CP group (38 vs. 19%; p = 0.015). Febrile neutropenia was more frequent in the PF group (8 vs. 0%; p = 0.058). All-grade nausea/vomiting was lower in the CP group (20 vs. 38%; p = 0.032). Efficacy was comparable between both regimens. In the multivariate analysis, the CRT regimen was not a significant predictor of survival. The CP regimen had less toxicity than the PF regimen, while efficacy was comparable. A large prospective randomized study is warranted to confirm these results.