BackgroundWe aimed to evaluate a novel method of atrial fibrillation (AF) screening using an iPhone camera to detect and analyze photoplethysmographic signals from the face without physical contact by extracting subtle beat‐to‐beat variations of skin color that reflect the cardiac pulsatile signal.Methods and ResultsPatients admitted to the cardiology ward of the hospital for clinical reasons were recruited. Simultaneous facial and fingertip photoplethysmographic measurements were obtained from 217 hospital inpatients (mean age, 70.3±13.9 years; 71.4% men) facing the front camera and with an index finger covering the back camera of 2 independent iPhones before a 12‐lead ECG was recorded. Backdrop and background light intensity was monitored during signal acquisition. Three successive 20‐second (total, 60 seconds) recordings were acquired per patient and analyzed for heart rate regularity by Cardiio Rhythm (Cardiio Inc, Cambridge, MA) smartphone application. Pulse irregularity in ≥1 photoplethysmographic readings or 3 uninterpretable photoplethysmographic readings were considered a positive AF screening result. AF was present on 12‐lead ECG in 34.6% (n=75/217) patients. The Cardiio Rhythm facial photoplethysmographic application demonstrated high sensitivity (95%; 95% confidence interval, 87%–98%) and specificity (96%; 95% confidence interval, 91%–98%) in discriminating AF from sinus rhythm compared with 12‐lead ECG. The positive and negative predictive values were 92% (95% confidence interval, 84%–96%) and 97% (95% confidence interval, 93%–99%), respectively.ConclusionsDetection of a facial photoplethysmographic signal to determine pulse irregularity attributable to AF is feasible. The Cardiio Rhythm smartphone application showed high sensitivity and specificity, with low negative likelihood ratio for AF from facial photoplethysmographic signals. The convenience of a contact‐free approach is attractive for community screening and has the potential to be useful for distant AF screening.

BackgroundModern smartphones allow measurement of heart rate (HR) by detecting pulsatile photoplethysmographic (PPG) signals with built-in cameras from the fingertips or the face, without physical contact, by extracting subtle beat-to-beat variations of skin color.ObjectiveThe objective of our study was to evaluate the accuracy of HR measurements at rest and after exercise using a smartphone-based PPG detection app.MethodsA total of 40 healthy participants (20 men; mean age 24.7, SD 5.2 years; von Luschan skin color range 14-27) underwent treadmill exercise using the Bruce protocol. We recorded simultaneous PPG signals for each participant by having them (1) facing the front camera and (2) placing their index fingertip over an iPhone’s back camera. We analyzed the PPG signals from the Cardiio-Heart Rate Monitor + 7 Minute Workout (Cardiio) smartphone app for HR measurements compared with a continuous 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) as the reference. Recordings of 20 seconds’ duration each were acquired at rest, and immediately after moderate- (50%-70% maximum HR) and vigorous- (70%-85% maximum HR) intensity exercise, and repeated successively until return to resting HR. We used Bland-Altman plots to examine agreement between ECG and PPG-estimated HR. The accuracy criterion was root mean square error (RMSE) ≤5 beats/min or ≤10%, whichever was greater, according to the American National Standards Institute/Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation EC-13 standard.ResultsWe analyzed a total of 631 fingertip and 626 facial PPG measurements. Fingertip PPG-estimated HRs were strongly correlated with resting ECG HR (r=.997, RMSE=1.03 beats/min or 1.40%), postmoderate-intensity exercise (r=.994, RMSE=2.15 beats/min or 2.53%), and postvigorous-intensity exercise HR (r=.995, RMSE=2.01 beats/min or 1.93%). The correlation of facial PPG-estimated HR was stronger with resting ECG HR (r=.997, RMSE=1.02 beats/min or 1.44%) than with postmoderate-intensity exercise (r=.982, RMSE=3.68 beats/min or 4.11%) or with postvigorous-intensity exercise (r=.980, RMSE=3.84 beats/min or 3.73%). Bland-Altman plots showed better agreement between ECG and fingertip PPG-estimated HR than between ECG and facial PPG-estimated HR.ConclusionsWe found that HR detection by the Cardiio smartphone app was accurate at rest and after moderate- and vigorous-intensity exercise in a healthy young adult sample. Contact-free facial PPG detection is more convenient but is less accurate than finger PPG due to body motion after exercise.

Approaches for atrial fibrillation (AF) detection can screen only 1 patient at a time. 1 In 2018, 2 we demonstrated a novel method of AF detection by analyzing facial photoplethysmographic (FPPG) signals without physical contact using a smartphone camera. 2 In this proof-ofconcept study, we prospectively evaluated the feasibility of high-throughput AF detection by analyzing FPPG signals 3 from multiple patients concurrently using a single digital cam-era and a pretrained deep convolutional neural network (DCNN). 4 Methods | After institutional approval from the Joint Chinese University of Hong Kong-New Territories East Cluster Clinical Research Ethics Committee and individual written informed consent, 20 patients (mean [SD] age, 76.6 [7.6] years; 12 men [60%]) with permanent AF and 24 control individuals (mean [SD] age, 56.8 [20.2] years; 14 men [58.3%]) in sinus rhythm (SR) were recruited. A digital camera (50D; Canon) was used to film 5 patients sitting in a row 150 cm away (Figure). We recorded 64 videos (1-minute duration, 24 FPS), each capturing 5 patients simultaneously in 32 different heart-rhythm