The MEV may be a significant source of bleeding during surgery of the skull base or middle ear, particularly during retrosigmoid and far-lateral approaches and detailed anatomical knowledge may help to prevent these complications. Endovascular treatment of dural arteriovenous fistulas is often extremely difficult due to limited access, however, the use of the MEV represents a unique and potentially valuable technique for accessing an isolated or inaccessible transverse or sigmoid sinus system.
Proper anesthesia and knowledge of the anatomical location of the iliohypogastric and ilioinguinal nerves is important during hernia repair and other surgical procedures. Surgical complications have also implicated these nerves, emphasizing the importance of the development of a clear topographical map for use in their identification. The aim of this study was to explore anatomical variations in the iliohypogastric and ilioinguinal nerves and relate this information to clinical situations. One hundred adult formalin fixed cadavers were dissected resulting in 200 iliohypogastric and ilioinguinal nerve specimens. Each nerve was analyzed for spinal nerve contribution and classified accordingly. All nerves were documented where they entered the abdominal wall with this point being measured in relation to the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS). The linear course of each nerve was followed, and its lateral distance from the midline at termination was measured. The ilioinguinal nerve originated from L1 in 130 specimens (65%), from T12 and L1 in 28 (14%), from L1 and L2 in 22 (11%), and from L2 and L3 in 20 (10%). The nerve entered the abdominal wall 2.8 ± 1.1 cm medial and 4 ± 1.2 cm inferior to the ASIS and terminated 3 ± 0.5 cm lateral to the midline. The iliohypogastric nerve originated from T12 on 14 sides (7%), from T12 and L1 in 28 (14%), from L1 in 20 (10%), and from T11 and T12 in 12 (6%). The nerve entered the abdominal wall 2.8 ± 1.3 cm medial and 1.4 ± 1.2 cm inferior to the ASIS and terminated 4 ± 1.3 cm lateral to the midline. For both nerves, the distance between the ASIS and the midline was 12.2 ± 1.1 cm. To reduce nerve damage and provide sufficient anesthetic for nerve block during surgical procedures, the precise anatomical location and spinal nerve contributions of the iliohypogastric and ilioinguinal nerves need to be considered.
With recent laparoscopic advancements in retroperitoneal and thoracic surgical procedures, familiarity with major lymphatic structures, such as including the cisterna chyli (CC) and thoracic duct (TD), has proven beneficial in avoiding misdiagnosis and iatrogenic intraoperative injury. In this light, the aim of our study was to explore and delineate the topography of the CC, classify the different patterns of lymphatic tributaries, and categorize its varying location with respect to the vertebral bodies. The anatomy of the CC was examined in 120 adult human cadavers. The CC was found in 83.3% of the specimens and both the tributaries of the CC and the location, with respect to vertebral level, demonstrated wide variation. The results were classified into four types. The most common tributary configuration (type I), found in 45% specimens, was a single CC formed by the union of the left lumbar trunk (LT) and the intestinal trunk (IT). In 30% the CC was formed where the IT opened into the TD and the right lumbar trunk (RT), LT, retroaortic nodes (RN) and branches from the intercostal lymphatics (IL) joined variably (type II). In 20% the CC was formed by the junction of the RT and IT (type III), while in 5% there was a variable confluence pattern of lymphatic trunks that could not be classified (type IV). The CC was located at L1-L2 (type A) in 63%, T12-L1 (type B) in 21%, T11-T12 (type C) in 8%, T10-11 (type D) in 5%, and T9-10 (Type E) in 3%, of the specimens. The CC was found in the retrocrural space and, in 75% of the cases, to the right of the abdominal aorta. We hope that the data supplied by this study will provide useful information in the future to anatomists, radiologists and surgeons alike.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.