Behavioral responses to sociosexual signals often depend on gonadal steroid hormones, which are thought to modulate behavior by acting on motivational systems in the brain. There is mounting evidence that sex steroids may also modulate perception of sociosexual signals by affecting sensory processing. In seasonally breeding songbirds such as the white-throated sparrow (Zonotrichia albicollis), the female's behavioral response to hearing male song depends on her plasma levels of estradiol (E2). Here, we examined whether plasma E2 also affects the selectivity of the song-induced zenk (egr-1) response in the auditory forebrain, which is known to vary according to the behavioral relevance of song stimuli. Non-breeding females were held on a winter-like photoperiod and implanted with silastic capsules containing either no hormone or E2. E2-treated birds hearing 42 min of conspecific song had more cells immunoreactive for the protein product of zenk in the auditory forebrain than did those hearing frequency-matched synthetic tones. In birds not treated with E2, however, the zenk response to song did not differ from that to tones. We found similar effects in the avian homolog of the inferior colliculus, indicating that E2 may affect the processing of auditory information upstream of the forebrain. Our data suggest that in females, zenk induction in the auditory system is selective for song only when plasma E2 exceeds non-breeding levels. E2-dependent plasticity of auditory pathways and processing centres may promote recognition of and attention to conspecific song during the breeding season.

Social behaviors such as courtship, parenting, and aggression depend primarily on two factors: a social signal to trigger the behavior, and a hormonal milieu that facilitates or permits it. Gonadal steroids may alter the valence or perceived context of the signal so that the same pheromone, vocalization, or visual display may elicit very different responses depending on the receiver's plasma hormone level. The neural processes underlying this phenomenon, however, are not well understood. Here, we describe how hormones modulate neural responses to social signals in female white-throated sparrows listening to recordings of male song. While manipulating levels of the ovarian steroid estradiol, we mapped and quantified sound-induced expression of the immediate early gene egr-1 in nine brain regions that constitute a social behavior network in vertebrates. In most regions of interest, hearing male song induced more expression than hearing tones or silence, and this selectivity for song was seen only in birds with estradiol levels typical of the breeding season. In females with regressed ovaries and no exogenous estradiol, neural responses were selective for song over tones only in the lateral portion of the ventromedial hypothalamus, not in the rest of the network. Because the effects of hormone treatment on neural responses are not identical in each region, the overall pattern of activation across the network changes with estradiol level and thus with season and breeding context. Our results demonstrate a possible mechanism by which gonadal steroids may alter the processing of social signals and affect social decision-making.

The neurohypophyseal hormones vasopressin and oxytocin are produced and released within the mammalian brain, where they act via multiple receptor subtypes. The neural distributions of these receptors, for example, V1a and oxytocin receptors, have been well described in many mammals. In birds, the distribution of binding sites for the homologous neuropeptides, vasotocin (VT) and mesotocin, has been studied in several species by using synthetic radioligands designed to bind to mammalian receptors. Such binding studies, however, may not reveal the specific distributions of each receptor subtype. To identify and map the receptors likely to bind VT and mesotocin, we generated partial cDNA sequences for four VT receptor subtypes, VT1, VT2 (V1b), VT3 (oxytocin-like), and VT4 (V1a), in white-throated sparrow (Zonotrichia albicollis) and zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata). These genes shared high sequence identity with the homologous avian and mammalian neurohypophyseal peptide receptors, and we found evidence for VT1, VT3, and VT4 receptor mRNA expression throughout the brains of both species. As has been described in rodents, there was striking interspecific and intraspecific variation in the densities and distribution of these receptors. For example, whereas the VT1 receptor mRNA was more widespread in zebra finch brain, the VT3 (oxytocin-like) receptor mRNA was more prevalent in the sparrow brain. Although VT2 (V1b) receptor mRNA was abundant in the pituitary, it was not found in the brain. Because of their association with brain regions implicated in social behavior, the VT1, VT3, and VT4 receptors are all likely candidates for mediating the behavioral effects of VT.

Vasotocin (VT) and its mammalian homologue, vasopressin (VP), modulate many social behaviors in a variety of vertebrate species. In songbirds, the effects of centrally administered VT vary according to species, which may reflect species-specific distributions of VT binding sites. Different radioligands used to map receptors in previous autoradiographical studies have revealed nonoverlapping distributions of VT binding, suggesting a heterogeneous population of more than one type of VT receptor. For two model songbird species, the white-throated sparrow (Zonotrichia albicollis) and zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata), we labeled putative VT receptors with two radioligands, [(125)I]ornithine vasotocin analog ([(125)I]OVTA) and [(125)I]linear VP antagonist ([(125)I]HO-LVA). Competitive binding assays in the lateral septum showed that both ligands were effectively displaced by both VT and a related nonapeptide, mesotocin (MT), showing that these radioligands, which were developed to label mammalian nonapeptide receptors, label at least one population of related receptors in songbirds. [(125)I]OVTA labeled receptors throughout the telencephalon, diencephalon, midbrain, and brainstem, with a similar distribution in both species. In contrast, the binding of [(125)I]HO-LVA was restricted to the septal area, dorsal arcopallium, and optic tectum in sparrow and was essentially undetectable in zebra finch. Because the avian brain is likely to express multiple types of VT receptors, we hypothesize that the binding patterns of these radioligands represent a heterogeneous receptor population.

No abstract

No abstract

In many species, courtship signals enhance reproductive function in the receiver. How these social signals are processed by the brain, particularly how they induce an endocrine response, is not well understood. Songbirds provide an ideal model in which to study this phenomenon because of the large existing literature on both their auditory neurobiology and the control of their reproductive physiology by environmental cues. To date, all of the relevant studies on songbirds have involved measuring the effects of male vocalizations on ovarian function over a period of weeks, a time course that precludes detailed analysis of the neuroendocrine mechanisms operating during song perception. We played recordings of conspecific male song to laboratory-housed female white-throated sparrows and quantified the resulting rapid changes in LH as well as the induction of the immediate early gene Egr-1 in the GnRH system and mediobasal hypothalamus (MBH). Hearing song for 42 min induced LH release and Egr-1 expression in the MBH, but did not alter Egr-1 expression in GnRH neurons. The time course of LH release and the pattern of Egr-1 expression together suggest that song acts as a trigger to induce GnRH release in a manner resembling photostimulation. The Egr-1 response in the MBH was qualitatively distinguishable from the responses to either photostimulation or pharmacologically induced LH release but seemed to involve overlapping neuronal populations. Song-induced Egr-1 expression in the MBH was correlated with the expression in midbrain and forebrain auditory centers, further supporting a role for the MBH in processing social information.

Four experiments were conducted to investigate the acoustic startle response to stimuli of low intensities. Eyeblink responses (integrated EMG from orbicularis oculi) were measured from male and female college students. Experiment 1 compared tone and noise stimuli varying in intensity (50 and 60 dB(A) SPL), with noise stimuli producing greater response amplitude and probability than tone stimuli. Experiment 2 was designed to investigate temporal summation of low intensity stimuli using single and paired 70dB(A) SPL broadband noises, and an onset-to-onset interval between the brief stimuli in a pair equal to the duration of the single stimuli. Increasing the duration of single stimuli resulted in larger responses, illustrating temporal summation. Experiment 3 used 60 and 70 dB(A) SPL broadband noise varying in rise/fall time, with faster-rising stimuli producing larger responses, and more intense stimuli producing larger and more probable responding. Experiment 4 employed the startle modification paradigm using 60 and 70 dB(A) SPL broadband noises as startle stimuli and a 50dB(A) SPL tone as a prepulse. Response amplitude and probability to both 60 and 70 dB(A) SPL stimuli were significantly inhibited by the 50dB(A) SPL prepulse. These studies show that the acoustic startle response is more sensitive than previously thought, and the elicitation of startle by low intensity stimuli argues against the limitation of the startle reflex as a high intensity phenomenon. These findings can increase the application of this response system by showing that startle stimuli need not be of high intensity, because reliable and differential startle can be elicited and modified at relatively low stimulus intensities.