No abstract

Bullous pemphigoid is an autoimmune disease of the skin characterized by the production of antibodies directed at structures of the basement membrane zone (BMZ) leading to subepidermal blisters. Several causative triggers have been described in the literature, among them UV light. Here, we report on a 73-year-old Caucasian female with disseminated morphea who developed blisters on her extremities after receiving whole-body UVA-1 phototherapy. The initial differential diagnosis of a phototoxic versus photoallergic reaction was ruled out as the lesions continued to spread after discontinuation of phototherapy. Histological and direct immunofluorescence examination showing a subepidermal blister and linear IgG deposits along the BMZ along with detection of circulating anti-BMZ antibodies led to the diagnosis of bullous pemphigoid. Immunosuppressive therapy resulted in regression of all blisters. After ruling out other possible causes, such as neoplasias or drugs, we conclude that UVA-1 has to be regarded as the most likely trigger of the disease.

No abstract

Reactive angioendotheliomatosis (RAE) is a very rare disorder characterized by marked proliferation of endothelial cells. It is often associated with infections, such as subacute bacterial endocarditis, but has also been described as an early sign of a developing hematological malignancy. We report the case of a 71-year-old Caucasian female who developed lupus-like RAE lesions. A thorough diagnostic workup and subsequent 3-year clinical follow-up revealed no sign of an underlying infectious or neoplastic disorder. Repetitive serum immunofixations were only once consistent with a monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. In lesional skin, the pronounced bud-like endothelial cell formation was associated with an increased epidermal expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a potent angiogenic mediator. In accordance with the paracrine action of epidermally derived VEGF, vascular endothelial cells in lesional skin revealed increased expression of the VEGF receptor VEGFR-2 (KDR). This case suggests a possible role of epidermally derived VEGF in endothelial cell proliferation in RAE.

The treatment of cicatricial pemphigoid, also called mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP), poses a great challenge, because the condition often takes an intransigent course despite all therapeutic efforts. Because of its diverse clinical manifestations, patients with MMP often have to be treated by a variety of specialists, including dermatologists, ophthalmologists, ear, nose, and throat specialists, and dentists. Since there are almost no randomized, controlled, double-blind studies comparing the use of various therapeutic agents in this condition, treatment decisions still rely heavily on individual clinicians' experience. Many different therapeutic regimens have been described in the literature, but only a few seem to hold up as valid alternatives. Systemic corticosteroids are still the agent of first choice, especially as rescue medication, for curtailing acute exacerbations. However, because of their well known long-term adverse effects, corticosteroids must be combined with immunosuppressive and/or anti-inflammatory agents. To determine which drug to choose, it is helpful to categorize patients -- as recommended by the First International Consensus -- in terms of high- and low-risk depending on the site and severity of their disease and on how rapidly it progresses. The recommended treatment for high-risk patients (i.e. patients with ocular, genital, laryngeal, esophageal or nasopharyngeal involvement) is a combination of prednisone and cyclophosphamide, or alternatively azathioprine. Once clinical improvement is evident, the corticosteroids should be slowly tapered. Dapsone is another alternative that may be used in high-risk patients, but patients who do not show any short-term improvement on this regimen should be switched to cyclophosphamide. Intravenous immunoglobulins are another effective, but expensive, treatment option in high-risk patients. Low-risk patients may well be managed with topical therapy alone, such as corticosteroids or cyclosporine. Other systemic options include dapsone, tetracycline, and nicotinamide as well as azathioprine in combination with low doses of corticosteroids. Various other systemic and topical agents, and recently biologics such as etanercept, have been reported to be effective in the treatment of MMP. However, most of the reported cases consisted of only small patient numbers and the true benefit of such agents in the condition is therefore not yet clear.