This paper reports a systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of treatment options in patients with haemophilia A with inhibitors. As very little relevant published evidence was identified, an economic modelling exercise was undertaken to calculate the cost-effectiveness of different strategies in the treatment of high-responding haemophilia A patients with inhibitors. A decision analysis approach was used to model the expected lifetime clinical outcomes and costs of the more common regimens currently used in UK in treating severe haemophiliacs with inhibitors. The model attempts to reflect the outcomes of clinical events, costs and life expectancy for each different treatment regimen for haemophilic boys with inhibitors who are high responders (defined as inhibitor level >/=10 BU) throughout their life. The basic model structure is centred on a Markov decision process, which was used to simulate, at quarter-yearly intervals, the movement through discrete health states and their complications. The model allows a comparison of cost-effectiveness between three immune tolerance induction (ITI) regimens (Bonn, Mälmo and Low-Dose protocols) and against a relevant 'on-demand' (OD) regimen. It also shows the cost-effectiveness of different OD regimens using different bypassing agents. The results of the economic modelling indicate that treating haemophilia A patients who have high-responding inhibitors OD with recombinant activated factor VII is cost-effective compared to treatment with activated prothrombin complex concentrates. However, when OD treatment regimens are compared with the three ITI protocols, the Malmö ITI protocol is the preferred treatment strategy, generating more quality adjusted life-years (QALYs) and less cost than either an OD regimen or the Bonn or Low-Dose ITI protocols.

In some patients with haemophilia A, therapeutically administered factor VIII (FVIII) comes to stimulate the production of antibodies (inhibitors) which react with FVIII to render it ineffective. As a result, FVIII cannot be used prophylactically and patients become liable to recurrent bleeds. There are two elements to the management of patients with inhibitors: the treatment of bleeding episodes, and attempts to abolish inhibitor production through the induction of immune tolerance. This paper reports a systematic review of the best available evidence of clinical effectiveness in relation to immune tolerance induction (ITI) in patients with haemophilia A with inhibitors. Owing to the lack of randomized controlled trials on this topic, broad inclusion criteria with regard to study design were applied in order to assess the best available evidence for each intervention. As a result of the clinical and methodological heterogeneity of the evidence, it was not appropriate to pool data across studies; instead, data were synthesized using tabulation and qualitative narrative assessment. The International Registry provides the most reliable estimate of the proportion of successful cases of ITI [48.7%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 42.6-52.7%]. The duration of effect is unclear, but relapses appear to be infrequent. The International Registry shows a rate of relapse of 15% at 15 years. The comparative effectiveness of different protocols is uncertain, as no trials have been undertaken which compare them directly. However, the evidence suggests that the Bonn protocol may be more effective than the Malmö or low-dose protocols. There is no good evidence that immunosuppressive drug regimens are effective.

Haemophilia is the commonest bleeding disorder in the UK, affecting approximately 5400 people, almost all of them male. In haemophiliacs, reduced levels, or absence, of factor VIII (FVIII) cause bleeding episodes, typically into joint spaces or muscles. Haemophilia is generally treated with exogenous FVIII. However, in some haemophiliacs, therapeutically administered FVIII comes to be recognized as a foreign protein, stimulating the production of antibodies (inhibitors), which react with FVIII to render it ineffective. Alternative treatment strategies then have to be used to manage bleeding episodes. In addition, strategies have been developed to attempt to abolish inhibitor production through the induction of immune tolerance. A systematic review was undertaken of current international practice for the clinical management of haemophilia A patients with inhibitors to FVIII, concentrating on literature published from 1995 onwards. Although it can be difficult to determine what constitutes current practice, current guidelines indicate that immune tolerance induction is seen as desirable, with the choice of regimen dependent on patient characteristics, familiarity with regimens and cost. Various approaches, based on similar factors, are used to control bleeding episodes.

This paper reports a systematic review of the best available evidence of clinical effectiveness in the treatment of acute bleeding in haemophilia A patients with inhibitors. Because of the lack of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on this topic, broad inclusion criteria with regard to study design were applied in order to assess the best available evidence for each intervention. Because of the clinical and methodological heterogeneity of the evidence, it was not appropriate to pool data across studies; instead, data were synthesized using tabulation and qualitative narrative assessment. No evidence was found to support the use of high-dose factor VIII (FVIII) in bleeding episodes. However in surgery it was found to be highly successful (100%) for low-titre, low-responding inhibitors although not reliable for high-responding inhibitors. Porcine FVIII (pFVIII) was effective in the control of severe bleeding episodes with high-titre or high-responding inhibitors (100%) and in 60-90% of surgical procedures. Activated prothrombin complex concentrates (APCCs) appear to be more effective than prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) in the control of mild to severe bleeding episodes. There was no good evidence for the use of PCCs in surgery. APCCs controlled bleeding in approximately 90% of surgical episodes. Recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) controlled 70-100% of mild to severe bleeding episodes with high-responding inhibitors, and achieved better results when used early. It was effective in 60-100% of surgical episodes. Doses varied from study to study, and side-effects from mild to infrequent but serious adverse events were reported. The quality of the evidence is variable. Limited evidence relating to other treatment options is also included in the review.

No abstract

Non-UK purchasers will have to pay a small fee for post and packing. For European countries the cost is £2 per monograph and for the rest of the world £3 per monograph.You can order HTA monographs from our Despatch Agents:-fax (with credit card or official purchase order) -post (with credit card or official purchase order or cheque) -phone during office hours (credit card only).Additionally the HTA website allows you either to pay securely by credit card or to print out your order and then post or fax it. Contact details are as follows: Payment methods Paying by chequeIf you pay by cheque, the cheque must be in pounds sterling, made payable to Direct Mail Works Ltd and drawn on a bank with a UK address. Paying by credit cardThe following cards are accepted by phone, fax, post or via the website ordering pages: Delta, Eurocard, Mastercard, Solo, Switch and Visa. We advise against sending credit card details in a plain email. Paying by official purchase orderYou can post or fax these, but they must be from public bodies (i.e. NHS or universities) within the UK. We cannot at present accept purchase orders from commercial companies or from outside the UK. How do I get a copy of HTA on CD?Please use the form on the HTA website (www.hta.ac.uk/htacd.htm). Or contact Direct Mail Works (see contact details above) by email, post, fax or phone. HTA on CD is currently free of charge worldwide.The website also provides information about the HTA Programme and lists the membership of the various committees. NHS R&D HTA ProgrammeT he research findings from the NHS R&D Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Programme directly influence key decision-making bodies such as the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) and the National Screening Committee (NSC) who rely on HTA outputs to help raise standards of care. HTA findings also help to improve the quality of the service in the NHS indirectly in that they form a key component of the 'National Knowledge Service' that is being developed to improve the evidence of clinical practice throughout the NHS.The HTA Programme was set up in 1993. Its role is to ensure that high-quality research information on the costs, effectiveness and broader impact of health technologies is produced in the most efficient way for those who use, manage and provide care in the NHS. 'Health technologies' are broadly defined to include all interventions used to promote health, prevent and treat disease, and improve rehabilitation and long-term care, rather than settings of care.The HTA programme commissions research only on topics where it has identified key gaps in the evidence needed by the NHS. Suggestions for topics are actively sought from people working in the NHS, the public, consumer groups and professional bodies such as Royal Colleges and NHS Trusts.Research suggestions are carefully considered by panels of independent experts (including consumers) whose advice results in a ranked list of recommended research priorities. The HTA Programme then commissions the research team best suited to un...

SummaryA day centre was established to determine whether an alternative approach to the management of uncomplicated sickle pain would improve the quality of care and reduce hospital admissions in patients with sickle cell disease. Since the centre opened there has been a 43% decrease in hospital admissions and 49% decrease in occupied bed days. In the third year, 84% of patients treated for severe sickle pain were managed without the need for hospital admission. A centre offering day case management of painful crisis reduced unnecessary hospital admissions for uncomplicated pain. This approach is safe and costeffective.

and àKMHO, Brighton, UK Summary. The clinical, humanistic and economic consequences associated with haemophilia and inhibitors are considerable. Primary treatment for mild-to-moderate bleeding disorders in such patients is recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) or activated prothrombin complex concentrate (APCC). The aims of this study were to identify, review and evaluate the quality of the published literature on the relative cost-effectiveness of rFVIIa and APCC in treating haemophilia patients with inhibitors. The review concentrates on model type, design and assumptions, and results. The results of this study suggest that rFVIIa may be the cost-effective alternative to treatment with APCC. In seven out of the nine studies, rFVIIa had the lower average treatment cost. The difference in average treatment cost to resolve a bleed, between rFVIIa and APCC in these seven studies, ranged from $3000 to $17 000. The adapted modelling framework is similar in all the economic models reviewed, suggesting clinical acceptability of the approach used. The estimates of efficacy varied between the models, especially for APCC. The efficacy for APCC derived from retrospective studies was lower than reported in the literature. Sensitivity analysis was undertaken in the majority of the economic analyses and the results were found to be robust to realistic parameter variations. Only one of the studies was a cost-utility study, showing the lack of measuring health status within this area. This systematic review showed that models based on different sources of data produced fairly similar robust results despite differences in the estimates of efficacy, average dosage required, and unit costs. However, ideally there should be a systematic approach to identifying the relevant data.