Objective:The objective of this study was to estimate the total cost of illness and economic burden of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD).Methods:Patients with DMD from Germany, Italy, United Kingdom, and United States were identified through Translational Research in Europe–Assessment & Treatment of Neuromuscular Diseases registries and invited to complete a questionnaire online together with a caregiver. Data on health care use, quality of life, work status, informal care, and household expenses were collected to estimate costs of DMD from the perspective of society and caregiver households.Results:A total of 770 patients (173 German, 122 Italian, 191 from the United Kingdom, and 284 from the United States) completed the questionnaire. Mean per-patient annual direct cost of illness was estimated at between $23,920 and $54,270 (2012 international dollars), 7 to 16 times higher than the mean per-capita health expenditure in these countries. Indirect and informal care costs were substantial, each constituting between 18% and 43% of total costs. The total societal burden was estimated at between $80,120 and $120,910 per patient and annum, and increased markedly with disease progression. The corresponding household burden was estimated at between $58,440 and $71,900.Conclusions:We show that DMD is associated with a substantial economic burden. Our results underscore the many different costs accompanying a rare condition such as DMD and the considerable economic burden carried by affected families. Our description of the previously unknown economic context of a rare disease serves as important intelligence input to health policy evaluations of intervention programs and novel therapies, financial support schemes for patients and their families, and the design of future cost studies.

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a rare pediatric neuromuscular disease associated with progressive muscle degeneration and extensive care needs. Our objective was to estimate the caregiver burden associated with DMD. We made cross-sectional assessments of caregiver health-related quality of life (HRQL) and burden using the EuroQol EQ-5D, a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), the SF-12 Health Survey, and the Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview (ZBI) administered online. Results were stratified by disease stage (early/late ambulatory/non-ambulatory) and caregivers’ rating of patients’ health and mental status. In total, caregivers to 770 patients participated. Mean EQ-5D utility ranged between 0.85 (95 % CI 0.82–0.88) and 0.77 (0.74–0.80) across ambulatory classes and 0.88 (0.85–0.90) and 0.57 (0.39–0.74) across caregivers’ rating of patients’ health and mental status. Mean VAS score was 0.74 (0.73–0.75), mean SF-12 Mental Health Component Summary score 44 (43–45), and mean ZBI score 29 (28–30). Anxiety and depression, recorded in up to 70 % of caregivers depending on patients’ health and mental status, was significantly associated with annual household cost burden (>$5000 vs. <$1000, odds ratio 1.76, 95 % CI 1.18–2.63) and hours of leisure time devoted to informal care per week (25–50 vs. <25 h 2.01, 1.37–2.94; >50 vs. <25 h 3.35, 2.32–4.83) (p < 0.007). We show that caring for a person with DMD can be associated with a substantial burden and impaired HRQL. Our findings suggest that caregivers to patients with DMD should be screened for depression and emphasize the need for a holistic approach to family mental health in the context of chronic childhood disease.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00415-016-8080-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Authors FORMULARY MANAGEMENT

AimTo estimate health‐related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD).Method HRQOL was assessed using the Health Utilities Index Questionnaire (HUI) and the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) neuromuscular module version 3.0 online. Results were stratified by disease stage (early/late ambulatory/non‐ambulatory) and caregivers’ perceptions of patients’ health and mental status.ResultsA total of 770 patient–caregiver pairs (173 German, 122 Italian, 191 UK, and 284 USA) participated. Most caregivers (>84%) perceived their patients as happy/somewhat happy and in excellent/very good/good health, irrespective of current ambulatory class. In contrast, mean patient utility (reflecting public preferences: 0, dead; 1, perfect health) deteriorated with disease course, from 0.75 in early ambulatory males to 0.15 in the most severely affected patients. Mean patient PedsQL scores (0–100, higher score indicating better HRQOL) decreased from 80 to 57 across ambulatory classes.Interpretation HRQOL in DMD, measured through public preferences, is substantially impaired in relation to the general population and significantly associated with disease progression. Still, most patients are perceived as happy and in good health by their caregivers, indicating that influential domains of HRQOL remain intact through the disease progression. Our findings emphasize the challenges in measuring HRQOL in a rare, progressive childhood condition such as DMD.

These results suggest that patients with migraine often delay their treatment until they have identified their attack as a migraine. In addition, while many patients treated their follow-up headache early, they did not treat when the pain was mild. This suggests that there is an opportunity for physicians to educate their migraine patients on how to differentiate migraine from other headache types and about when and how to use their acute-migraine medication.

Overall, none of the GEn treatment groups differentiated from placebo. Analyses of the secondary endpoints showed comparable results across treatment groups. However, the majority of the endpoints, including all of the pain endpoints, showed the largest numerical treatment difference was between GEn 3,600 mg and placebo. The active control, PGB (300 mg/day), did not differentiate from placebo.

Background International care guidelines for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) were published in 2010, but compliance in clinical practice is unknown. Objective The objective of our study was to compare real-world DMD care in Germany, Italy, the UK, and the US with the clinical recommendations. Methods DMD patients from Germany, Italy, the UK, and the US were identified through Translational Research in Europe – Assessment & Treatment of Neuromuscular Diseases (TREAT-NMD) registries and invited with a caregiver to complete a questionnaire with questions regarding DMD-related healthcare. Estimates of care were stratified by disease stage (early/late ambulatory/non-ambulatory) and compared against the care guidelines. Results A total of 770 patients (173 German, 122 Italian, 191 UK, and 284 US) completed the questionnaire. Poor compliance to guidelines of routine follow-up by neuromuscular, cardiac, and respiratory specialists, physiotherapy, and access to medical devices and aids were observed in all countries. Less than 27% (209 of 770) of patients met all absolute recommendations, ranging from 9% (11 of 122) in Italy to 37% (70 of 191) in the UK, and from 49% (76 of 155) in the early ambulatory class to 16% (33 of 205) in the late non-ambulatory class. Conclusions We show that the medical management of DMD varies substantially between Germany, Italy, the UK, and the US. Experience of real-world DMD care appears to be in poor agreement with the DMD clinical guidelines and increased compliance is urgently needed to improve treatment outcomes and enable patients to lead fulfilling, independent lives into adulthood.

The objective of this study was to describe the development and initial psychometric analysis of the UK English version of the Duchenne muscular dystrophy Functional Ability Self-Assessment Tool (DMDSAT), a patient-reported outcome (PRO) scale designed to measure functional ability in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Item selection was made by neuromuscular specialists and a Rasch analysis was performed to understand the psychometric properties of the DMDSAT. Instrument scores were also linked to cost of illness and health-related quality of life data. The administered version, completed by 186 UK patient-caregivers pairs, included eight items in four domains: Arm function, Mobility, Transfers, and Ventilation status. These items together successfully operationalized functional ability in DMD, with excellent targeting and reliability (Person Separation Index: 0.95; Cronbach's α: 0.93), stable item locations, and good fit to the Rasch model (mean person/item fit residual: -0.21/-0.44, SD: 0.32/1.28). Estimated item difficulty was in excellent agreement with clinical opinion (Spearman's ρ: 0.95) and instrument scores mapped well onto health economic outcomes. We show that the DMDSAT is a PRO instrument fit for purpose to measure functional ability in ambulant and non-ambulant patients with DMD. Rasch analysis augments clinical expertise in the development of robust rating scales.