Cluster of differentiation (CD)8 ؉ T cells exist as naive, central memory, and effector memory subsets, and any of these populations can be genetically engineered into tumor-reactive effector cells for adoptive immunotherapy. However, the optimal subset from which to derive effector CD8 ؉ T cells for patient treatments is controversial and understudied. We investigated human CD8 ؉ T cells and found that naive cells were not only the most abundant subset but also the population most capable of in vitro expansion and T-cell receptor transgene expression. Despite increased expansion, naive-derived cells displayed minimal effector differentiation, a quality associated with greater efficacy after cell infusion. Similarly, the markers of terminal differentiation, killer cell lectin-like receptor G1 and CD57, were expressed at lower levels in cells of naive origin. Finally, naive-derived effector cells expressed higher CD27 and retained longer telomeres, characteristics that suggest greater proliferative potential and that have been linked to greater efficacy in clinical trials. Thus, these data suggest that naive cells resist terminal differentiation, or "exhaustion," maintain high replicative potential, and therefore may be the superior subset for use in adoptive immunotherapy. (Blood. 2011;117(3):808-814)
IntroductionIt is now possible to genetically engineer human T lymphocytes to express virtually any known gene, including genes encoding T-cell receptors (TCRs) or chimeric antigen receptors (CARs), to provide the desired T-cell specificity. These gene-engineered lymphocytes hold the promise to treat infectious diseases and cancer, 1-10 but the appropriate substrate cells to use is understudied, and most current protocols simply transfer genes into "bulk" peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Varieties of data indicate that T cells, and in particular CD8 ϩ T cells, are worthy substrates for gene engineering. However, CD8 ϩ T cells in peripheral blood are themselves a complex mixture, composed of at least 3 major subsets-naive (T N ), central memory (T CM ), and effector memory (T EM )-each having different functional qualities.The optimal subset to engineer for adoptive immunotherapy is controversial. 8,[11][12][13][14] Memory CD8 ϩ T-cell subsets are more studied than naive cells, because antigen-specific clones can be found at increased frequencies. In a landmark paper, Berger et al 13 have shown in macaques that effector cells derived from T CM rather than T EM possess greater ability to survive and establish immunologic memory after infusion. This finding is consistent with data comparing memory subsets in mice. 15 However, T N cells were not explicitly analyzed in these reports, 12 an omission that might be important given recent findings in mice that naive T cells convey more antitumor activity than memory cells. 12 Short of conducting a series of clinical trials, the decision of which CD8 ϩ T-cell subset to use for clinical protocols will depend on the cell phenotypes that result from transduction of T...