This is a PDF file of a peer-reviewed paper that has been accepted for publication. Although unedited, the content has been subjected to preliminary formatting. Nature is providing this early version of the typeset paper as a service to our authors and readers. The text and figures will undergo copyediting and a proof review before the paper is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Barrier integrity is central to the maintenance of healthy immunological homeostasis. Impaired skin barrier function is linked with enhanced allergen sensitization and the development of diseases such as atopic dermatitis (AD), which can precede the development of other allergic disorders, for example, food allergies and asthma. Epidemiological evidence indicates that children suffering from allergies have lower levels of dietary fibre-derived short-chain fatty acids (SCFA). Using an experimental model of AD-like skin inflammation, we report that a fermentable fibre-rich diet alleviates systemic allergen sensitization and disease severity. The gut-skin axis underpins this phenomenon through SCFA production, particularly butyrate, which strengthens skin barrier function by altering mitochondrial metabolism of epidermal keratinocytes and the production of key structural components. Our results demonstrate that dietary fibre and SCFA improve epidermal barrier integrity, ultimately limiting early allergen sensitization and disease development.

To assess the capacity of a peptide-based immunotherapy to induce systemic tolerance via the nasal route, we designed three long overlapping peptides of 44–60 aa covering the entire sequence of phospholipase A2 (PLA2), a major bee venom allergen. Both prophylactic and therapeutic intranasal administrations of long peptides to PLA2-hypersensitive CBA/J mice induced specific T cell tolerance to the native allergen. In prophylactic conditions, this tolerance was marked by a suppression of subsequent specific IgE response, whereas the therapeutic approach in presensitized mice induced a more than 60% decrease in PLA2-specific IgE. This decline was associated with a shift in the cytokine response toward a Th1 profile, as demonstrated by decreased PLA2-specific IgG1 and enhanced IgG2a levels, and by a decline in the specific IL-4/IFN-γ ratios. T cell transfer from long peptide-tolerized mice to naive animals abrogated the expected anti-PLA2 IgE and IgG1 Ab response, as well as specific T cell proliferation, but enhanced specific IgG2a response upon sensitization with PLA2. These events were strongly suggestive of a clonal anergy affecting more profoundly Th2 than the Th1 subsets. In conclusion, these results demonstrate that allergen-derived long peptides delivered via the nasal mucosa may offer an alternative to immunotherapy with native allergens without the inherent risk of systemic anaphylactic reactions. Moreover, long peptides, in contrast to immunotherapy strategies based on short peptides, have the advantage of covering all potential T cell epitopes, and may represent novel and safe tools for the therapy of allergic diseases.

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Emerging evidence suggests that long-term pulmonary symptoms and functional impairment occurs in a proportion of individuals following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Although the proportion of affected patients remains to be determined, physicians are increasingly being confronted with patients reporting respiratory symptoms and impairment beyond the acute phase of COVID-19. In face of limited evidence, the Swiss Society for Pulmonology established a working group to address this area of unmet need and formulated diagnostic and treatment recommendations for the care of patients with pulmonary long COVID (LC). <b><i>Method:</i></b> The Swiss COVID Lung Study group and Swiss Society for Pulmonology (SSP) formulated 13 questions addressing the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary LC. A survey within the SSP special interest groups involved in care of LC patients was conducted in Switzerland. A CORE process/Delphi-like process was used to formulate recommendations. Forty experienced pulmonologists replied to the first survey and 22 completed the second follow-up survey. Agreement of ≥70% consensus led to formulation of a recommendation. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The participants in the survey reached consensus and formulated a <i>strong recommendation for</i> regarding the following points. Patients hospitalized for COVID-19 should have a pulmonary assessment including pulmonary function tests. Symptomatic subjects affected by COVID-19, including those with mild disease, should benefit from a pulmonary follow-up. Persistent respiratory symptoms after COVID-19 should be investigated by a pulmonary follow-up including plethysmography, diffusion capacity measurement, and blood gases analysis. Individuals having suffered from COVID-19 and who present with persistent respiratory symptoms should be offered a rehabilitation. Additional questions were given <i>moderate</i>or<i> weak recommendations for</i>. The panel did not reach sufficient consensus for pharmacological therapy (e.g., therapy specifically targeting lung fibrosis) to formulate recommendations for LC drug treatment. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The formulated recommendations should serve as an interim guidance to facilitate diagnosis and treatment of patients with pulmonary LC. As new evidence emerges, these recommendations may need to be adapted.

BackgroundThe Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is increasingly used for clinical decision making in acute care but little is known about frailty after COVID-19.ObjectivesTo investigate frailty and the CFS for post-COVID-19 follow-up.MethodsThis prospective multicentre cohort study included COVID-19 survivors aged ≥50 years presenting for a follow-up visit ≥3 months after the acute illness. Nine centres retrospectively collected pre-COVID-19 CFS and prospectively CFS at follow-up. Three centres completed the Frailty Index (FI), the short physical performance battery (SPPB), 30 s sit-to-stand test and handgrip strength measurements. Mixed effect logistic regression models accounting for repeated measurements and potential confounders were used to investigate factors associated with post-COVID-19 CFS. Criterion and construct validity were determined by correlating the CFS to other concurrently assessed frailty measurements and measures of respiratory impairment, respectively.ResultsOf the 288 participants 65% were men, mean (SD) age was 65.1 (9) years. Median (IQR) CFS at follow-up was 3 (2–3), 21% were vulnerable or frail (CFS ≥4). The CFS was responsive to change, correlated with the FI (r=0.69, p<0.001), the SPPB score (r=−0.48, p<0.001) (criterion validity) and with the St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire score (r=0.59, p<0.001), forced vital capacity %-predicted (r=−0.25, p<0.001), 6 min walk distance (r=−0.39, p<0.001) and modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) (r=0.59, p<0.001). Dyspnoea was significantly associated with a higher odds for vulnerability/frailty (per one mMRC adjusted OR 2.01 (95% CI 1.13 to 3.58), p=0.02).ConclusionsThe CFS significantly increases with COVID-19, and dyspnoea is an important risk factor for post-COVID-19 frailty and should be addressed thoroughly.