No abstract

No abstract

BackgroundUrinary tract infections (UTIs) are common in dogs. The responsible bacterial populations have evolved with increasing resistance to many antimicrobials.ObjectiveTo characterize the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of canine urinary tract isolates over a 51‐month period.AnimalsOne thousand six hundred and thirty‐six bacterial isolates from 1,028 dogs.MethodsAerobic bacterial isolate growth and susceptibility data from urine cultures of dogs were identified, retrospectively. Medical records were reviewed to obtain signalment, comorbidities, and antimicrobial use in the previous 30 days. The UTIs were further categorized as uncomplicated, complicated, or pyelonephritis.ResultsCommon bacterial isolates identified were Escherichia coli (52.5%), Staphylococcus spp. (13.6%), and Enterococcus spp. (13.3%). In vitro susceptibility among all isolates varied for commonly prescribed antimicrobials (amoxicillin [59%], amoxicillin/clavulanic acid [76%], cephalexin [66%], enrofloxacin [74%] and trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole [86%]). For all antimicrobials tested (except aminoglycosides), in vitro susceptibility was higher in uncomplicated versus complicated infections (P < .05). Uncomplicated infection isolate susceptibility rates remained ≤90% for PO administered antimicrobials. Administration of amoxicillin, doxycycline, and enrofloxacin, but not amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in the previous 30 days was associated with resistance to that antimicrobial. Multidrug resistant isolates of E. coli and Staphylococcus spp. were more common in dogs with complicated than uncomplicated UTIs (36% versus 21%, P < .0001).Conclusions and Clinical ImportanceIn vitro susceptibility was highly variable and no PO administered antimicrobial had >90% efficacy among isolates tested. Multidrug resistance was frequent among isolates tested suggesting that routine culture and susceptibility testing is indicated. Previously prescribed antimicrobials may affect empirical choices made pending susceptibility testing.

Further follow-up may define an acceptable low-risk group for breast relapse. Until then, we recommend that all patients receive breast irradiation. Systemic adjuvant therapy should be considered for patients with poor nuclear grade tumors.

Objective: To describe the rate and predictors of central nervous system (CNS) disease in emergency department (ED) patients with dizziness in the modern era of neuroimaging. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all adults presenting between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2009, to an academic ED for a primary triage complaint of dizziness, vertigo, or imbalance. The final diagnosis for the cause of dizziness was independently assigned by 2 neurologists, with a third neurologist resolving any disagreements. The primary outcome was a composite of ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, transient ischemic attack, seizure, brain tumor, demyelinating disease, and CNS infection. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to assess the association between clinical variables and serious CNS causes of dizziness. Results: Of 907 patients experiencing dizziness (mean age, 59 years; 58% women [nϭ529]), 49 (5%) had a serious neurologic diagnosis, including 37 cerebrovascular events. Dizziness was often caused by benign conditions, such as peripheral vertigo (294 patients [32%]) or orthostatic hypotension (121 patients [13%]). Age 60 years or older (odds ratio [OR], 5.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5-11.2), a chief complaint of imbalance (OR, 5.9; 95% CI, 2.3-15.2), and any focal examination abnormality (OR, 5.9; 95% CI, 3.1-11.2) were independently associated with serious neurologic diagnoses, whereas isolated dizziness symptoms were inversely associated (OR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.0-0.7). Conclusion: Dizziness in the ED is generally benign, although a substantial fraction of patients harbor serious neurologic disease. Clinical suspicion should be heightened for patients with advanced age, imbalance, or focal deficits.

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01849991.

Background and Purpose-Dizziness can herald a cerebrovascular event. The ABCD 2 score predicts the risk of stroke after transient ischemic attack partly by distinguishing transient ischemic attack from mimics. We evaluated whether this score would also identify cerebrovascular events among emergency department patients with dizziness. Methods-We retrospectively identified consecutive adults presenting to a university emergency department with a primary symptom of dizziness, vertigo, or imbalance. Two neurologists independently reviewed medical records to determine whether the presenting symptom was caused by a cerebrovascular event (ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, or intracranial hemorrhage). ABCD 2 scores were then assigned using clinical information from the medical record. The ability of the score to discriminate between patients with cerebrovascular events and those with other diagnoses was quantified using the c statistic. Results-Among 907 dizzy patients (mean age, 59 years; 58% female), 37 (4.1%) had a cerebrovascular cause, the majority of which were ischemic strokes (nϭ24). The median ABCD 2 score was 3 (interquartile range, 3-4). The ABCD 2 score predicted ultimate diagnosis of a cerebrovascular event (c statistic, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.73-0.85). Only 5 of 512 (1.0%) patients with a score of Յ3 had a cerebrovascular event compared to 25 of 369 patients (6.8%) with a score of 4 or 5 and 7 of 26 patients (27.0%) with a score of 6 or 7. Conclusions-The ABCD 2 score may provide useful information on dizzy emergency department patients at low-risk for having a cerebrovascular diagnosis and may aid frontline providers in acute management if validated prospectively. (Stroke.

A review of published reports of spinal cord tolerance after stereotactic body radiation therapy was performed. This report presents several dose-response models, recommends dose limits for the spinal cord, and outlines standards for future reporting Spinal cord tolerance data for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) were extracted from published reports, reviewed, and modelled. For de novo SBRT delivered in 1 to 5 fractions, the following spinal cord point maximum doses (D max) are estimated to be associated with a 1% to 5% risk of radiation myelopathy (RM): 12.4 to 14.0 Gy in 1 fraction, 17.0 Gy in 2 fractions, 20.3 Gy in 3 fractions, 23.0 Gy in 4 fractions, and 25.3 Gy in 5 fractions. For reirradiation SBRT delivered in 1 to 5 fractions, reported factors associated with a lower risk of RM include cumulative thecal sac equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions with an alpha/beta of 2 (EQD2 2) D max 70 Gy; SBRT thecal sac EQD2 2 D max 25 Gy, thecal sac SBRT EQD2 2 D max to cumulative EQD2 2 D max ratio 0.5, and a minimum time interval to reirradiation of !5 months. Larger studies containing complete institutional cohorts with dosimetric data of