Objective: The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the influence of vertical platform discrepancies for splinted and non-splinted adjacent implants on radiographic marginal bone loss (RMBL). Methods: Data from January 2000 to February 2021 were collected from the electronic charts of 156 patients with 337 implants at the UCSF School of Dentistry. Five different implant restoration categories were evaluated for radiographic evidence of proximal RMBL. Patients with (1) two adjacent single crowns, (2) two adjacent splinted crowns, (3) three-unit bridges supported by two implants, (4) three adjacent single crowns, and (5) three adjacent splinted crowns. Inclusion required baseline radiograph taken at the time of prosthesis delivery or final impression, and follow-up radiographs at least 12 months after restorations have been in function. Measurements assessed included vertical distance between adjacent implant platforms and proximal RMBL around implants. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of implants with ≥1 mm RMBL between different type of restorations were calculated.Results: In general, prostheses supported by splinted adjacent implants demonstrated a significant association with the presence of ≥1 mm RMBL (OR = 2.55, 95% CI = 1.17-5.17, p = 0.018) when compared to prostheses supported by non-splinted adjacent implants. In addition, prostheses with a vertical platform discrepancy ≥0.5 mm demonstrated a significant association with the presence of ≥1 mm RMBL (OR = 4.30, 95% CI = 1.85 to 10.01, p = 0.007) when compared to prostheses with a vertical platform discrepancy <0.5 mm. When adjacent implants had ≥0.5 mm vertical platform discrepancy, the majority (66.67%) of three splinted adjacent crowns had at least one implant with ≥1 mm RMBL. This was followed by two splinted adjacent crowns (58.97%), three-unit bridge (25.93%), two single adjacent crowns (24.24%), and three single adjacent crowns (18.18%). When adjacent implants had ≥1 mm vertical platform discrepancy, there was an increased percentage of implants with ≥1 mm RMBL. The restorative design associated with the highest percent of implants with bone loss was three splinted adjacent crowns (70%), two splinted adjacent crowns Guo-Hao Lin and Christine Tran contributed equally to this study.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Fetal brain MR imaging interpretations are subjective and require subspecialty expertise. We aimed to develop a deep learning algorithm for automatically measuring intracranial and brain volumes of fetal brain MRIs across gestational ages. MATERIALS AND METHODS:This retrospective study included 246 patients with singleton pregnancies at 19-38 weeks gestation. A 3D U-Net was trained to segment the intracranial contents of 2D fetal brain MRIs in the axial, coronal, and sagittal planes. An additional 3D U-Net was trained to segment the brain from the output of the first model. Models were tested on MRIs of 10 patients (28 planes) via Dice coefficients and volume comparison with manual reference segmentations. Trained U-Nets were applied to 200 additional MRIs to develop normative reference intracranial and brain volumes across gestational ages and then to 9 pathologic fetal brains.RESULTS: Fetal intracranial and brain compartments were automatically segmented in a mean of 6.8 (SD, 1.2) seconds with median Dices score of 0.95 and 0.90, respectively (interquartile ranges, 0.91-0.96/0.89-0.91) on the test set. Correlation with manual volume measurements was high (Pearson r ¼ 0.996, P , .001). Normative samples of intracranial and brain volumes across gestational ages were developed. Eight of 9 pathologic fetal intracranial volumes were automatically predicted to be .2 SDs from this age-specific reference mean. There were no effects of fetal sex, maternal diabetes, or maternal age on intracranial or brain volumes across gestational ages.CONCLUSIONS: Deep learning techniques can quickly and accurately quantify intracranial and brain volumes on clinical fetal brain MRIs and identify abnormal volumes on the basis of a normative reference standard.
Introduction: Root coverage procedures are not always predictable, and outcomes depend on several factors. This technique provides a predictable alternative to managing facial gingival recessions. Case Series: A new grafting technique is introduced that requires no incisions at the recipient site, thereby preserving the integrity of the local blood supply to optimize the healing process. The graft is placed through the gingival sulcus via a molar or canine access (MOCA) approach, and there is minimal tension on the coronally advanced flap through use of suspension sutures. Thirteen nonsmoking patients, between the ages of 27 and 57, with Cairo RT1 facial recession were studied, with a follow-up period of 1-60 weeks. This paper explains the step-by-step technique and highlights 13 cases. Conclusion: Complete root coverage was achieved in all 13 cases, although one case showed initial altered healing. While MOCA is technique sensitive, it provides optimal root coverage results. With no incisions at the recipient site, there is no uneven texture or scar formation, and healing proceeds with minimal interruption.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.