No abstract

PURPOSE Social network analysis (SNA) provides a way of quantitatively analyzing relationships among people or other information-processing agents. Using 2 practices as illustrations, we describe how SNA can be used to characterize and compare communication patterns in primary care practices.METHODS Based on data from ethnographic fi eld notes, we constructed matrices identifying how practice members interact when practice-level decisions are made. SNA software (UCINet and KrackPlot) calculates quantitative measures of network structure including density, centralization, hierarchy and clustering coeffi cient. The software also generates a visual representation of networks through network diagrams. RESULTSThe 2 examples show clear distinctions between practices for all the SNA measures. Potential uses of these measures for analysis of primary care practices are described.CONCLUSIONS SNA can be useful for quantitative analysis of interaction patterns that can distinguish differences among primary care practices. INTRODUCTIONP rimary care practices are complex systems that are characterized by dynamic patterns of interactivity among practice members and their environment. [1][2][3] One feature of complex systems is the property of emergence, which is the tendency of organized patterns to emerge that cannot be predicted from the properties of individual parts of the system. 4 Thus, to understand how primary care practices function, it is necessary to study not only the individuals within the practice or individual practice components but also the relationships among individuals.5 Study of such patterns and how they change with time or in response to interventions requires an ability to look at the entire complex web of relationships and interactions within a primary care practice. Although qualitative description 6-10 and practice genograms 11 have demonstrated utility for understanding the complex interactions in practices, a tool that captures quantitative aspects of the patterns of relationships within practices would be a useful aid in studies of primary care practices. Social network analysis (SNA) is such a tool.SNA 13 More recent work examines the association of these quantitative measures with organizational performance outcomes. Cummings and Cross, for example, found that degree of hierarchy, core-periphery structure, and structural holes of leaders correlated negatively with performance in 182 work groups in a large telecommunications company, 14 and Aydin et al found that increased network communication density was associated with higher use of an electronic medical record system by nurse practitioners and physician' s assistants. 15 There have also been studies showing how network parameters change with time. Shah, for example showed that network centrality decreased after downsizing in a consumer electronics fi rm, 16 whereas Burkhardt and Brass documented increased network centrality after introduction of a new computer system in a federal agency. 17In this article, using data from 2 primary ...

PURPOSEThe Using Learning Teams for Refl ective Adaptation (ULTRA) study used facilitated refl ective adaptive process (RAP) teams to enhance communication and decision making in hopes of improving adherence to multiple clinical guidelines; however, the study failed to show signifi cant clinical improvements. The purpose of this study was to examine qualitative data from 25 intervention practices to understand how they engaged in a team-based collaborative change management strategy and the types of issues they addressed. METHODSWe analyzed fi eld notes and interviews from a multimethod practice assessment, as well as fi eld notes and audio-taped recordings from RAP meetings, using an iterative group process and an immersion-crystallization approach.RESULTS Despite a history of not meeting regularly, 18 of 25 practices successfully convened improvement teams. There was evidence of improved practicewide communication in 12 of these practices. At follow-up, 8 practices continued RAP meetings and found the process valuable in problem solving and decision making. Seven practices failed to engage in RAP primarily because of key leaders dominating the meeting agenda or staff members hesitating to speak up in meetings. Although the number of improvement targets varied considerably, most RAP teams targeted patient care-related issues or practice-level organizational improvement issues. Not a single practice focused on adherence to clinical care guidelines.CONCLUSION Primary care practices can successfully engage in facilitated team meetings; however, leaders must be engaged in the process. Additional strategies are needed to engage practice leaders, particularly physicians, and to target issues related to guideline adherence. Ann Fam Med 2010;8:425-432. doi:10.1370/afm.1159. INTRODUCTIONThe quality of care in the United States is substandard, 1 and the early promise of improving care by translating research into practice has been disappointing. 2,3 Initial efforts to improve quality often target improving knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of individual health professionals by using such strategies as audit and feedback, reminder systems, continuing medical education, and educational outreach. 4 These strategies have been found to produce modest change. 2,3,[5][6][7][8] Even when improvement changes are adopted, they are often not sustained over time 7 and may deteriorate after practice members' attention shifts elsewhere.8 Sustaining change appears to be an active process that requires continual attention as innovations are adapted to fi t continually evolving environments.9,10 Additionally, small, independent primary care practices often lack the resources 426T E A M -BA SED CHANGE M A NAGEMENT or motivation needed to develop quality improvement strategies that can address multiple clinical issues. 11The substantial, broad improvements required for optimal primary care cannot be achieved by focusing improvement efforts on specifi c diseases or on individual professional behavior. In fact, primary care pract...

PURPOSE Electronic medical record (EMR) systems offer substantial opportunities to organize and manage clinical data in ways that can potentially improve preventive health care, the management of chronic illness, and the fi nancial health of primary care practices. The functionality of EMRs as implemented, however, can vary substantially from that envisaged by their designers and even from those who purchase the programs. The purpose of this study was to explore how unique aspects of a family medicine offi ce culture affect the initial implementation of an EMR. METHODSAs part of a larger study, we conducted a qualitative case study of a private family medicine practice that had recently purchased and implemented an EMR. We collected data using participant observation, in-depth interviews, and key informant interviews. After the initial data collection, we shared our observations with practice members and returned 1 year later to collect additional data.RESULTS Dysfunctional communication patterns, the distribution of formal and informal decision-making power, and internal confl icts limited the effective implementation and use of the EMR. The implementation and use of the EMR made tracking and monitoring of preventive health and chronic illness unwieldy and offered little or no improvement when compared with paper charts.CONCLUSIONS Implementing an EMR without an understanding of the systemic effects and communication and the decision-making processes within an offi ce practice and without methods for bringing to the surface and addressing confl icts limits the opportunities for improved care offered by EMRs. Understanding how these common issues manifest within unique practice settings can enhance the effective implementation and use of EMRs. INTRODUCTIONB oth the Institute of Medicine and the Future of Family Medicine project have recommended the use of information technologies and electronic medical record (EMR) systems as tools for improving the quality of care 1 and patient safety. 2,3 Recent research has shown that information technologies can reduce medication errors, 4 improve adherence to clinical practice guidelines, 5 and improve the delivery of preventive health services, 6 thereby potentially improving health outcomes for patients. 7 In addition, using an EMR that includes electronic prescribing as well as electronic charting offers substantial fi nancial benefi ts to primary care organizations and the health system as a whole. 8 Even so, relatively few primary care practices use EMRs. 9 Reasons for not adopting EMRs may include the temporary loss of revenue associated with EMR implementation, 8 physician perception that EMRs negatively affect workfl ow, and concerns about patient privacy. 9 Even in settings where clinicians are committed to EMRs, implementation requires skilled users and a commitment to making the EMR an integral part of the 10 Without these personal and institutional commitments to full implementation, EMRs may actually represent a net fi nancial drain on primary care pr...

The U.S. health care system serves a diverse population, often resulting in significant disparities in delivery and quality of care. Nevertheless, most quality improvement efforts fail to systematically assess diversity and associated disparities. This article describes application of the multimethod assessment process (MAP) for understanding disparities in relation to diversity, cultural competence, and quality improvement in clinical practice. MAP is an innovative quality improvement methodology that integrates quantitative and qualitative techniques and produces a system level understanding of organizations to guide quality improvement interventions. A demonstration project in a primary care practice illustrates the utility of MAP for assessing diversity.