Risk stratification of patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC) is an epidemiologically relevant question. But the results based on conventional heart rate variability (HRV) analysis are still unsatisfactory. The adjustments within the cardiovascular system incorporate nonlinear and complex mechanisms of information exchange which may have additional prognostic value. It is an objective of the present work to evaluate the prognostic value of autonomic information flow (AIF) measures in IDC patients compared to conventional HRV measures in a first explorative study. Holter recordings of 32 patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC) and 12 normal subjects (NRM) were analyzed. The IDC patients consisted of two groups: 10 high risk (HR) patients, after aborted sudden cardiac death (SCD); 22 low risk (LR) patients, without SCD. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and ROC characteristics of a comprehensive set of AIF measures, organized according to the conventional HRV standards, and conventional HRV measures were investigated. The significant risk predictors were evaluated by Spearman's rank correlation. While the only traditional HRV measure discriminating IDC patients from NRM was ln(LF) most of the AIF measures had a discriminatory value. Concerning the prognosis of the IDC patients by conventional HRV we found that SDNN and all frequency band measures (lnHF, lnLF, lnVLF) significantly discriminated HR from LR. Among the AIF measures the time shift related peak decay (PD(dHF)) reflecting the HF band information flow had a prognostic value. PD(dHF) was identified as a promising candidate which might improve the predictive value of traditional HRV analysis, predominantly represented by SDNN. A subsequent comprehensive clinical study is necessary to validate this hypothesis.
The cardiovascular system incorporates several controlling mechanisms acting as feedback loops over different time horizons. Because of their complex interrelationships, information-based methods such as autonomic information flow (AIF) functions promise to be useful in identifying normal and pathological behavior. Optimal adjustment between those controllers is necessary for healthy global behavior of the organism. We investigated the question as to whether there are typical relationships between short-term and long-term AIF by means of a meta-analysis of several of our own clinical studies of the mortality of patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, heart failure, idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, and the length of stay in hospital after abdominal aorta surgery. We found a fundamental association of increased short-term randomness (decreased AIF) and decreased long-term randomness (increased AIF) due to pathology. A systems theoretic validation of this fundamental type of association was done by an appropriate mathematical model using a dissipative system with two feedback loops over different time horizons. The systematic simulation of an increasing collapse of the short feedback loop confirmed the inverse association between short-term and long-term information flow as a fundamental, system inherent type of readjustment that occurs under pathological conditions.
Different time scales of AIF represent specific pathophysiological aspects of altered complex autonomic control (communication) and consequently have predictive implications.
A 54-year-old man was admitted to hospital because of chronic right-sided heart failure. Echocardiography revealed dilatation of all chambers of the heart. Cardiac catheterization showed high-output heart failure due to left-to-right shunt caused by a congenital fistula between the right iliac artery and vein. The fistula was closed by percutaneous implantation of a covered stent. 15 months later, the patient denied any cardiac complaint. On echocardiography, the size of all chambers had almost normalized, cardiac catheterization proved a normal cardiac output. By angiography and oximetry, neither a residual nor a relapsing shunt were seen.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.