Results indicate that a tailored intervention is effective in increasing motivational readiness for exercise in individuals who were in stages of change other than maintenance.
Background: The population of older adults with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is increasing and nephrologists need education on the principles of geriatrics and palliative care to effectively care for this population. Objectives: Our objective was to develop and deliver a curriculum to interprofessional clinicians caring for older adults with CKD. The aim of this curriculum would be to improve knowledge of the principles of geriatrics and palliative care. Design: We have previously developed a curriculum on geriatrics and palliative care targeted toward primary care teams. In this project, we used an interdisciplinary steering committee to modify the curriculum for nephrology teams. Setting: This curriculum was delivered in a live grand rounds setting and was recorded and made available via online platform for virtual learning. Participants: The 6-session curriculum was delivered to 611 live and online learners between January 2018 and April 2019, with more than half of the participants (n = 317) completing more than 1 session. Participants came from a variety of disciplines including medicine, nursing, pharmacy, and social work. Results: Participants had a high rate of agreement with the statement that the curriculum met learning objectives, with live participants having stronger agreement. Participants reported that the activity would change their practice behavior by calling palliative care earlier, as well as improving their communication skills. Conclusion: Interprofessional collaboration can result in improved learning around the management of patients with CKD or end-stage kidney disease.
The Medicare Annual Wellness Visit (AWV) involves a personalized risk assessment and prevention plan to help prevent disease and disability among older adults. Though studies have shown that AWV uptake is suboptimal, little is known about the perspectives and experiences of patients completing it. Family medicine physicians are conducting AWVs at a Rhode Island pilot teaching clinic participating in the GWEP's Age-Friendly Health Systems Initiative. To evaluate perspectives of the clinic's under-resourced patients, 20 qualitative telephone interviews were conducted following their AWV. Interview recordings were analyzed for content and themes. Few patients recognized the term ‘Annual Wellness Visit’ or recognized it was significantly different from other visits: “I noticed it was a bit different, but not that different. I’m usually not covered for a visit like that by Medicare.” Mental health, mobility and medications were discussed at most of the AWVs. Some patients noticed that a physician did the medication review instead of the nurse. Patients had varying experiences of how advance directives were discussed, and some thought it unnecessary since a family member knows their preferences. A few patients were dissatisfied that their physician did not focus on their chronic or acute health problems. However, most patients “trusted” their physicians to do “whatever is necessary” for them, and were glad to have had the AWV because “instead of talking about being sick all the time, talking about how to stay well”. Recommendations for patient education to improve understanding and the experience of the AWV will be offered.
Geriatric Workforce Enhancement Programs (GWEPs) are ideally suited to develop and implement educational programs to transform the geriatric care system. They link academic programs, clinical partners, and community-based organizations to bridge care system gaps to improve the health and social care of older adults. Such a collaboration is especially important in falls prevention, where primary care assessments generate referrals to community programs that enroll older adults to reduce their risk of falling. However, exporting an evidence-based model developed in one context for implementation in another is not without its perils and pitfalls. This paper explores the challenges of applying a model developed elsewhere to the Rhode Island context, including the need to understand how structural differences in academic, primary care, and community-based systems require flexibility, innovation, and persistence in overcoming the networking challenges in these different settings. Recommendations for implementing program models in a variety of settings are explored.
Transformational efforts to redesign the care system for older adults call for the development of novel partnership models incorporating academic institutions, primary care networks, and community-based organizations. The Rhode Island Geriatric Workforce Enhancement Program (RI-GWEP) has utilized the “resource exchange model” to develop innovative, interdisciplinary, and integrated projects combining educational resources, clinical expertise, programmatic experience, and impact evaluation. With particular emphasis on the challenges of developing interprofessional education spanning the traditional gaps between disciplines and departments, this presentation emphasizes the critical conditions, components, and capacities of such a collaborative network. These include: (1) mission dominance, (2) barter exchange, (3) partnership investment, and (4) interpersonal relationships. RI-GWEP’s experience provides insights into the conceptual foundation of geriatrics networks and specific, concrete examples of projects incorporating these principles. Implications for the development of networks in other settings include consideration of particular: (1) projects, (2) people, (3) places, (4) personalities, and (5) possibilities.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.