The enantiomeric (-)- and (+)-N-(methyl through decyl) normetazocines (5,9 alpha-dimethyl-2'-hydroxy-6,7-benzomorphans) were synthesized and their in vitro and in vivo activities determined. Increasingly bulky enantiomeric N-alkyl homologs were prepared until their interaction with the sigma 1 receptor decreased and their insolubility became a hindrance to their evaluation in vivo and/or in vitro. The (-)-methyl, -pentyl, -hexyl, and -heptyl homologs were essentially as potent as, or more potent than, morphine in the tail-flick, phenylquinone, and hot-plate assays for antinociceptive activity; the (-)-propyl homolog had narcotic antagonist activity between that of nalorphine and naloxone in the tail-flick vs morphine assay, and it also displayed antagonist properties in the single-dose suppression assay in the rhesus monkey. The antinociceptively potent (-)-heptyl homolog did not substitute for morphine in monkeys but did show morphine-like properties in a primary physical-dependence study in continuously infused rats. All five potent compounds showed high affinity for the mu opioid receptor from both rat and monkey preparations and the kappa opioid receptor (< 0.05 microM), and all except the (-)-methyl homolog interacted reasonably well at the delta receptor (K(i) < 0.1 microM). The (-)-propyl compound was equipotent (K(i) 1.5-2.0 nM) at mu and kappa receptors. The pattern of interaction of the (-)-enantiomeric homologs with mu receptors from rat and monkey preparations was similar, but not identical. The enantioselectivity of the homologs for mu receptors was greater in the rat than in the monkey preparation for all but the N-H and butyl compounds, and the enantioselectivity of the lower homologs (methyl through butyl) for the mu (monkey) receptor was greater than for the kappa or delta receptors. However, bulkier homologs (hexyl through decyl) displayed higher enantioselectivity at kappa or delta receptors than at the mu (monkey) receptor. The (+)-butyl through (+)-octyl homologs were essentially equipotent with, or more potent than, (+)-pentazocine at the sigma receptor. Only the (+)-H and (+)-methyl homologs had high affinity (< 0.05 microM) at PCP binding sites.

The broad-spectrum C-8-cyano-fluoroquinolone finafloxacin displays enhanced activity under acidic conditions. This phase II clinical study compared the efficacies and safeties of finafloxacin and ciprofloxacin in patients with complicated urinary tract infection and/or pyelonephritis. A 5-day regimen with 800 mg finafloxacin once a day (q.d.) (FINA05) had results similar to those of a 10-day regimen with 800 mg finafloxacin q.d. (FINA10). Combined microbiological and clinical responses at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit were 70% for FINA05, 68% for FINA10, and 57% for a 10-day ciprofloxacin regimen (CIPRO10) in 193 patients (64 for FINA05, 68 for FINA10, and 61 for CIPRO10) of the microbiological intent-to-treat (mITT) population. Additionally, the clinical effects of ciprofloxacin on patients with an acidic urine pH (80% of patients) were reduced, whereas the effects of finafloxacin were unchanged. Finafloxacin was safe and well tolerated. Overall, 43.4% of the patients in the FINA05 group, 42.7% in the FINA10 group, and 54.2% in the CIPRO10 group experienced mostly mild and treatment-emergent but unrelated adverse events. A short-course regimen of 5 days of finafloxacin resulted in high eradication and improved clinical outcome rates compared to those for treatment with ciprofloxacin for 10 days. In contrast to those of ciprofloxacin, the clinical effects of finafloxacin were not reduced by acidic urine pH. Hospitalized adults were randomized 1:1:1 to finafloxacin treatment (800 mg q.d.) for either 5 or 10 days or to ciprofloxacin treatment (400 mg/500 mg b.i.d.) for 10 days with an optional switch from intravenous (i.v.) to oral administration at day 3. The primary endpoint was the combined microbiological and clinical response at the TOC visit in the microbiological intent-to-treat population. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT01928433.).

virus isolations from mosquitoes in arid regions of Western Australia: implication of vertical transmission as a means of persistence of the virus.

This study investigated the in vitro activity of finafloxacin against bacterial strain panels of the biodefense pathogens. Broth microdilution assays were performed at neutral and acidic pH to determine the effectiveness of the antibiotics under conditions typical of an intracellular environment. In all instances, finafloxacin demonstrated superior activity at low pH.

Infection with aerosolised Francisella tularensis or Yersinia pestis can lead to lethal disease in humans, if treatment is not initiated promptly. Finafloxacin is a novel fluoroquinolone which has demonstrated broad-spectrum activity against a range of bacterial species in vitro, in vivo and in humans, activity which is superior in acidic, infection-relevant conditions. Human equivalent doses of finafloxacin or ciprofloxacin were delivered at 24 hours (representing prophylaxis), or at 72 or 38 hours (representing treatment) post-challenge with F. tularensis or Y. pestis (respectively), in Balb/c mouse models. In addition, a short course (3 days) of therapy was compared to a longer course (7 days). Both therapies provided a high level of protection against both infections, when administered at 24 hours post-challenge, irrespective of the length of the dosing regimen, however, differences were observed when therapy was delayed. A benefit was demonstrated with finafloxacin, when compared to ciprofloxacin in both models, when therapy was delivered later in the infection. These studies suggest that finafloxacin is an effective alternative therapeutic for the prophylaxis and treatment of inhalational infections with F. tularensis or Y. pestis.

The goal of this randomized, double-blind crossover clinical trial in 50 healthy volunteers sensitive to acidic foods was to evaluate whether Ester-C calcium ascorbate causes fewer epigastric adverse effects than are produced by regular ascorbic acid (AA). Volunteers were randomly separated into 2 groups of 25. The study comprised an observation period of 9 days (phase 1 medication for 3 consecutive days, washout phase for 3 consecutive days, phase 2 medication for 3 consecutive days). Participants took 1000 mg vitamin C as Ester-C during phase 1 of the study followed by 1000 mg of vitamin C as AA during phase 2, or vice versa. During the course of the study, 3 examinations for the evaluation of epigastric adverse effects were performed (on days 0, 3, and 9). Participants used a diary to record epigastric adverse effects on a daily basis. In total, 28 (56%) of 50 participants reported 88 epigastric adverse effects of mild to moderate intensity. Of these 88 adverse effects, 33 (37.5%) occurred after intake of Ester-C and 55 (62.5%) were noted after intake of AA. The tolerability of Ester-C was rated "very good" by 72% of participants, whereas AA was rated "very good" by only 54%. This difference is statistically significant (P<.05). Investigators concluded that Ester-C compared with AA caused significantly fewer epigastric adverse effects in participants sensitive to acidic foods and that Ester-C is much better tolerated.

Two phase II studies were performed with patients with uncomplicated urinary tract infections (uUTIs) and complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) or acute pyelonephritis (PN) to compare finafloxacin (300 mg twice a day [b.i.d.] orally for uUTI and 800 mg once a day [q.d.] intravenously [i.v.] for cUTI/PN) and ciprofloxacin (250 mg b.i.d. orally for uUTI and 400 mg b.i.d. i.v. for cUTI/PN). The early response to the study medications was evaluated in the microbiological intent-to-treat population (mITT) at day 3. A total of 21% of the isolates were ciprofloxacin resistant, 13.7% were primed pathogens carrying a mutation(s) potentially fostering fluoroquinolone resistance development, and 7.1% produced extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs). Finafloxacin demonstrated very good early clinical activity, with microbiological eradication rates of 88.6% ( = 132), compared to 78.7% ( = 61) for ciprofloxacin, and 69.6% ( = 23), compared to 35.7% ( = 14) for ciprofloxacin, in patients with ciprofloxacin-resistant uropathogens; 94.1% ( = 17), compared to 80.0% ( = 10) for ciprofloxacin, in patients infected with uropathogens primed for fluoroquinolone resistance uropathogens; and 91.7% ( = 11), compared to 0% for ciprofloxacin, in patients infected with ESBL producers. Finafloxacin demonstrated early and rapid activity against uropathogens, including fluoroquinolone-resistant and/or multiresistant pathogens or ESBL producers, while ciprofloxacin was less active against this subset of resistant pathogens. Susceptibilities of pathogens were quantitated by broth microdilution. Isolates were subgrouped according to their susceptibility patterns, in particular first-step quinolone resistance, quinolone resistance, and ESBL production. Eradication was defined as the elimination or reduction of study entry pathogens to <10 CFU/ml in urine culture. (The studies described in this paper have been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifiers NCT00722735 and NCT01928433.).

The efficacy of finafloxacin as a component of a layered defense treatment regimen was determined in vitro and in vivo against an infection with Burkholderia pseudomallei. Doxycycline was down-selected from a panel of antibiotics evaluated in vitro and used in combination with finafloxacin in a Balb/c mouse model of inhalational melioidosis. When treatment was initiated at 24 h post-infection with B. pseudomallei, there were no differences in the level of protection offered by finafloxacin or doxycycline (as monotherapies) when compared to the combination therapy. There was evidence for improved bacterial control in the groups treated with finafloxacin (as monotherapies or in combination with doxycycline) when compared to mice treated with doxycycline. Survival comparisons of finafloxacin and doxycycline (as monotherapies) or in combination initiated at 36 h post-infection indicated that finafloxacin was superior to doxycycline. Doxycycline was also unable to control the levels of bacteria within tissues to the extent that doxycycline and finafloxacin used in combination or finafloxacin (as a sole therapy) could. In summary, finafloxacin is a promising therapy for use in the event of exposure to B. pseudomallei.