No abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a substantial and lasting impact on care provision, particularly in the field of cancer care. National steering has helped monitor the health situation and adapt the provision and organisation of care. Based on data from the French administrative healthcare database (SNDS) on the entire French population (67 million people), screening, diagnostic and therapeutic activity was monitored and compared 2019 on a monthly basis. A noteworthy decline in all activities (with the exception of chemotherapy) was observed during the first lockdown in France. Over the months that followed, this activity returned to normal but did not make up for the shortfall from the first lockdown. Finally, during the lockdown in late 2020, cancer care activity was conserved. In brief, in 2020, the number of mammograms decreased by 10% (− 492,500 procedures), digestive endoscopies by 19% (− 648,500), and cancer-related excision by 6% (− 23,000 surgical procedures). Hospital radiotherapy activity was down 3.8% (− 4400 patients) and that in private practice was down 1.4% (− 1600 patients). Chemotherapy activity increased by 2.2% (7200 patients), however. To summarize, COVID-19 had a very substantial impact during the first lockdown. Safeguarding cancer care activity helped limit this impact over the months that followed, but the situation remains uncertain. Further studies on the medium- and long-term impact on individuals (survival, recurrence, after-effects) will be conducted.

No abstract

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has altered the health care delivery system. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on breast cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment. Methods: Potential survey respondents were identified through partnerships with breast cancer organizations including Dr. Susan Love Foundation for Breast Cancer Research, SHARE, Survivingbreastcancer.org, Sisters Network Inc., the African American Breast Cancer Alliance, and through ResearchMatch.org. Study information was shared via social media, websites, or email. Individuals were eligible for this study if they: 1) receive routine breast cancer screening, or 2) are undergoing diagnostic evaluation for breast cancer, or 3) had ever been diagnosed with breast cancer. Participants accessed and completed the 10-15-minute REDCap survey either by emailing the research team and receiving a private survey link or by clicking a public link. The survey collected information on respondent demographics; breast cancer screening and diagnosis; the extent to which screening, diagnosis, or treatment had been changed, delayed, or canceled because of COVID-19; personal protective practices; extent of worry about financial and health implications of COVID-19; and use of telemedicine. We used descriptive statistical analyses to better understand the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on respondents. Results: There are currently 415 survey respondents, 404 of whom agreed to participate in the study. 46.8% (N=189) of respondents were white, 26.7% (N=108) Black, 6.7% (N=27) Asian, and 5.5% Hispanic or Latino (N=22). Most respondents were between the ages of 50 and 69 years (52.2%, N=211). 43.3% (N=175) of respondents had been diagnosed with breast cancer and, of those, 36% (N=63) were in active treatment. More than a quarter of participants (26.5%, N=107) reported delayed or canceled breast cancer care due to COVID-19; the most frequently affected care was screening mammogram, ultrasound, or MRI (97.2%, N=104). 20.6% (N=13) of women in active treatment reported delayed or canceled surgery, chemotherapy, or radiation visits. 22.3% (N=90) of respondents reported that an in-person visit was changed to a phone call or videoconference, and 39.1% (N=158) said they had discussed COVID-19 with a health care provider. 29.1% (N=51) of those with breast cancer were worried or very worried that the COVID-19 pandemic would make it harder for them to get cancer care; among those without breast cancer, 34.9% (N=80) were worried that COVID-19 would make it harder to obtain health care, including breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic continues to disrupt breast cancer-related care, primarily screening. Planning and coordination are necessary to ensure the timely return of these patients to care. Most participants agreed to be contacted for follow-up, allowing us to investigate the long-term effects of delayed breast cancer screening, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment on health outcomes. Citation Format: Erica T. Warner, Emily Restrepo, Christine Benjamin, Ricki Fairley, Laura Roudebush, Leah Eshraghi, Crystal Hertz, Simo Du, Laura Carfang. Patient-reported impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on breast cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment: A national survey [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Meeting: COVID-19 and Cancer; 2020 Jul 20-22. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2020;26(18_Suppl):Abstract nr S11-02.

Purpose: To evaluate and quantify potential sociodemographic disparities in breast cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and the use of telemedicine. Methods: We fielded a 52-item web-based questionnaire from 14 May 2020 to 1 July 2020 in partnership with several U.S.-based breast cancer advocacy groups. Individuals aged 18 or older were eligible for this study if they: (1) received routine breast cancer screening; OR (2) were undergoing diagnostic evaluation for breast cancer; OR (3) had ever been diagnosed with breast cancer. We used descriptive statistics to understand the extent of cancer care delay and telemedicine adoption and used multivariable logistic regression models to estimate the association of sociodemographic factors with odds of COVID-19-related delays in care and telemedicine use. Results: Of 554 eligible survey participants, 493 provided complete data on demographic and socioeconomic factors and were included in the analysis. Approximately half (n = 248, 50.3%) had a personal history of breast cancer. Overall, 188 (38.1%) participants had experienced any COVID-19-related delay in care including screening, diagnosis, or treatment, and 339 (68.8) reported having at least one virtual appointment during the study period. Compared to other insurance types, participants with Medicaid insurance were 2.58 times more likely to report a COVID-19-related delay in care (OR 2.58, 95% Cl: 1.05, 6.32; p = 0.039). Compared to participants with a household income of less than USD 50,000, those with a household income of USD 150,000 or more were 2.38 (OR 2.38, 95% Cl: 1.09, 5.17; p = 0.029) times more likely to adopt virtual appointments. Self-insured participants were 70% less likely to use virtual appointment compared to those in other insurance categories (OR 0.28, 95% Cl: 0.11, 0.73; p = 0.009). Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on breast cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment, and accelerated the delivery of virtual care. Lower-income groups and patients with certain insurance categories such as Medicaid or self-insured could be more likely to experience care delay or less likely to use telemedicine. Careful attention must be paid to vulnerable groups to insure equity in breast cancer-related service utilization and telemedicine access during and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.

No abstract

Background: Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is the fifth most common cause of death from cancer globally.1 MBC is incurable and its trajectory complicated. Patients have only a few days to choose treatments after an unexpected diagnosis, and most conversations with health care professionals (HCPs) are oral, a communication method with low retention accuracy (14%).2 Patients and caregivers feel ill prepared and overwhelmed. Yet when visuals are introduced into HCP/patient communication, accurate recall can be as high as 85% for low-literacy populations.2 Aim: Test if visually based communication tools can be used by HCPs to increase MBC patient and caregiver understanding of MBC as incurable, and confidence in making treatment decisions for quality of life. Methods: Survey of MBC patients (n=487) communication experience prior to treatment of Stage IV; interviews with HCPs (n=20) in the clinic to identify communication barriers with patients; empathy role play with HCPs and patients to clarify viewpoints (n=7); analysis of patient materials; in-depth interviews with MBC patients and communication experts (n=12); iterative design process of communication tool prototype with MBC patient group (n=48) and HCPs. Results: Only 1 in 8 patients were educated with visuals during initial discussions with HCPs. Less than half of patients (46%) included HER2 and hormone receptor status when asked to describe their subtype. One-third of patients felt they did not have enough knowledge to participate in decision-making for treatment and 58% of patients felt rushed to start; 71% did not recall discussing goals/hobbies; and just 62% discussed pain and symptom management. HCPs want to deliver difficult news in a clear and empathetic way, reduce repetition, save time educating patients, and have better tools for caregivers; current patient materials are impersonal and overwhelming. Iterative development and testing of the MBC Communication Toolkit prototype with HCPs and patients showed patients understood treatment options more easily with a visual metaphor while HCPs using the prototype said the images were effective for communicating symptoms and treatment options. Conclusion: A visual approach to improving communication between MBC patients and caregivers and their HCPs seems possible based on positive results of patient interpretation and practitioner feedback. Visual tools can help HCPs engage patients with information to enable them to understand their disease, goals, and nature of treatments so they can make informed, appropriate decisions. REFERENCES 1. International Agency for Research on Cancer: Breast cancer: estimated incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide in 2012. Available at https://globocan.iarc.fr/Pages/fact-sheets_cancer.aspx 2. Houts PS, Witmer JT, Egeth HE, et al: Using pictographs to enhance recall of spoken medical instructions II. Patient Educ Couns 43:231-242, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-3991(00)00171-3

No abstract