A key part of keeping doctoral and postdoctoral trainees in STEM research careers is mentoring. Our previous research indicates that mentoring trainees in scientific communication (SC) skill development increases research career intention through two social-cognitive constructs, self-efficacy in and outcome expectations for acquiring SC skills, as well as science identity. While many mentor training interventions exist, no programs focus on developing SC skills specifically. The “Scientific Communication Advances Research Excellence” (SCOARE) program trains mentors to address trainee scientific communication (SC) skill development as an innovative approach to increase trainee research career persistence. The SCOARE training is a half-day workshop for faculty mentors of research trainees at five sites nationally. Informed by previous research, workshop content focuses on practical, effective mentoring strategies to develop trainee speaking and writing skills. Anonymous evaluation data collected after each workshop indicates participant satisfaction and reported positive increases in skills and knowledge in applying new and various techniques when mentoring trainees (skills) and how linguistic bias influences our perception of others (knowledge). This article outlines the research-based development of the SCOARE program, the first two years’ of workshop evaluations showing positive increases in skills and knowledge, and lessons learned to increase participant satisfaction with the program.
PurposeThe purpose of the paper is to examine the use of employee volunteering programs to develop leadership skills.Design/methodology/approachThe study used a series of interviews carried out in ten companies in the north of the UK in 2004.FindingsThe paper finds that employee volunteering programs provide a potentially rich source of learning for team leaders and other volunteers. Such a strategy can encourage employees to recognize learning opportunities for their own leadership skills.Originality/valueThe paper provides valuable information on the development and use of employee volunteering programs.
What do learners expect?B Being taught something new by someone who is presented as an expert speaker in that area. This usually results in disappointment at the subsequent realization that whilst the speaker was both witty and wise, there are no practical steps which can be realistically implemented.B Being given magic answers to complex and difficult situations. This is another potential area of disappointment when the realization comes that the solution is usually common sense, it is the implementation of the solution which is the difficult part.B The ''tutor'' being the source of learning rather than the group itself, a common negative comment on evaluation reports will be a report that ''I learnt more from the others in the group than anything the course itself.'' How can we influence expectations in advance?B Provide clear and unambiguous titles for programs. Titles like ''Customer service survival'', ''Developing you, developing your business'' and ''Self discipline and emotional control'' may sound sexy and enticing and therefore sell places on the program but their meaning is unclear and makes it hard for the learner to self select.
<p>The geosciences are one of the least diverse fields in the U.S., despite their societal relevance. Bias, discrimination, harassment and bullying create hostile climates that present serious hurdles to diversifying the field. These behaviors persist due to severe power imbalances, historical structures of exclusion, persistent marginalization of non-majority groups, and inadequate policies against misconduct. Here we discuss findings from a workplace climate survey of the earth and space sciences distributed via five professional associations: American Geophysical Union, Geological Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, Earth Science Women&#8217;s Network and the Association for Women Geoscientists. The survey asked about attitudes and experiences of support, inclusion, exclusion, psychological safety, incivility, and sexual harassment, as well as representation in the workplace. Quantitative results are complemented with qualitative data from the survey and focus groups. This is one of the first such community-wide surveys in the U.S. geosciences and is currently being replicated in the ecological sciences.&#160;</p><p>We present the findings of the survey in the context of other work done by the ADVANCEGeo Partnership team and provide recommendations for moving forward. Our approach is informed by critical feminist approaches that seek to disrupt unequal power dynamics in strongly hierarchical workplaces. Expanding the focus from a gender equity program emphasis on sexual harassment to hostile climates, and centering how intersectionality shapes the experiences of those disproportionately impacted by exclusionary behaviors is key for addressing persistent demographic trends in the geosciences. A feminist ethics of care approach informs ADVANCEGeo&#8217;s main organizational change intervention, which is a community-based model for bystander intervention and workplace climate education that identifies harassment, bullying and discrimination as scientific misconduct and promotes the adoption of ethical codes of conduct.</p>
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.