We evaluated the influence of intraguild predation among generalist insect predators on the suppression of an herbivore, the aphid Aphis gossypii, to test the appropriateness of the simple three trophic level model proposed by Hairston, Smith, and Slobodkin (1960). We manipulated components of the predator community, including three hemipteran predators and larvae of the predatory green lacewing Chrysoperla carnea, in field enclosure/exclosure experiments to address four questions: (1) Do generalist hemipteran predators feed on C. carnea? (2) Does intraguild predation (IGP) represent a substantial source of mortality for C. carnea? (3) Do predator species act in an independent, additive manner, or do significant interactions occur? (4) Can the experimental addition of some predators result in increased densities of aphids through a trophic cascade effect? Direct observations of predation in the field demonstrated that several generalist predators consume C. carnea and other carnivorous arthropods. Severely reduced survivorship of lacewing larvae in the presence of other predators showed that IGP was a major source of mortality. Decreased survival of lacewing larvae was primarily a result of predation rather than competition. IGP created significant interactions between the influences of lacewings and either Zelus renardii or Nabis predators on aphid population suppression. Despite the fact that the trophic web was too complex to delineate distinct trophic levels within the predatory arthropod community, some trophic links were sufficiently strong to produce cascades from higher-order carnivores to the level of herbivore population dynamics: experimental addition of either Z. renardii or Nabis predators generated sufficient lacewing larval mortality in one experiment to release aphid populations from regulation by lacewing predators. We conclude that intraguild predation in this system is wide-spread and has potentially important influences on the population dynamics of a key herbivore.
Experiments were conducted to test whether the facultatively phytophagous predator Orius insidiosus (Say) (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) ingested phloem, xylem or mesophyll contents from soybean plants (Glycine max L.). Potential uptake of phloem sap was examined by radiolabeling photosynthate with 14CO2 and then measuring the accumulation of radiolabeled metabolites in feeding animals. Most O. insidiosus feeding on radiolabeled plants ingested no or very low levels of label; only 3% ingested small amounts of label, indicating the experimental insects fed very little, if at all, on the phloem. In contrast, well known phloem feeding insects used as positive controls accumulated substantial levels of labeled metabolites after feeding on known host plants. O. insidiosus did feed on xylem contents, as shown by ingestion of safranin‐labeled xylem fluid. A few of the insects showed signs of feeding on the mesophyll, as indicated by the presence of chloroplasts in the gut. However, the small diameter of the food canal may cause limited passage of chloroplasts, which would contribute to an underestimation of the frequency of mesophyll feeding. Some radiolabeled metabolites remain in the mesophyll so those insects that ingested low levels of radiolabel probably ingested label from the mesophyll, which supports the notion that some level of mesophyll feeding occurred. Feeding site determines the nutrients ingested during phytophagy. These insects obtain water from the xylem, and may ingest small amounts of starches, sugars, and amino acids from the mesophyll. The results suggest that facultative phytophagy by this heteropteran predator primarily provides the insect with water, but also may provide some nutrients that supplement a prey diet and help the predator survive periods when prey are scarce.
Control of the Colorado potato beetle (CPB), Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), with the entomopathogenic nematode Heterorhabditis marelata Liu and Berry (Nematoda: Heterorhabditidae) was examined in the laboratory and in potato fields in north central Oregon. This research tested the hypothesis that varying nitrogen fertilizer levels would affect foliar alkaloid levels, which would stress the host, and allow increased nematode reproduction and long-term control of the CPB. Laboratory results indicated that nematodes tended to reproduce more readily in CPB fed on potato plants with high levels of fertilizer. Field trials tested CPB population responses to four treatments: application of nematodes vs. no nematodes, with application of low vs. high rates of nitrogen fertilizer. The higher nitrogen application rate increased field foliar levels of the alkaloids solanine by 35%, and chaconine by 41% over the season. Nematodes were applied twice during the season, causing a 50% reduction in adult CPB populations, and producing six times as many dead prepupae in nematode-treated soil samples as in the untreated samples. However, no reproducing nematodes were found in the 303 dead prepupae and pupae collected from nematode-treated plots. Nitrogen fertilizer levels, and their related alkaloid levels, did not affect nematode infection rates or reproduction in the field. Foliar alkaloid levels of plants from the growth chamber were 3-6-fold as high as those in the field, which may explain the variation in nematode response to nitrogen applications to host plants of the CPB. Heterorhabditis marelata is effective for controlling CPB in the field, and does not have negative non-target effects on one of the most common endemic CPB control agents, Myiopharus doryphorae (Riley) (Diptera: Tachinidae), but the low rate of nematode reproduction cannot be manipulated through alkaloid stress to the beetle. Until H. marelata can be mass-produced in an inexpensive manner, it will not be a commercially viable control for CPB.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.