No abstract

Resistance to tamoxifen is a major clinical challenge in the treatment of breast cancer; however, it is still unclear which signaling pathways are the major drivers of tamoxifen-resistant growth. To characterize resistance mechanisms, we have generated different tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer cell lines from MCF-7. In this model, we investigated whether signaling from human epidermal growth factor receptors (HERs), their downstream kinases, or from the estrogen receptor α (ERα) was driving tamoxifen-resistant cell growth. Increased expression of EGFR and increased phosphorylation of HER3 were observed upon acquisition of tamoxifen resistance, and the extracellular activated kinase (ERK) signaling pathway was highly activated in the resistant cells. The EGFR inhibitor gefitinib and the ERK pathway inhibitor U0126 resulted in partial and preferential growth inhibition of tamoxifen-resistant cells. All the tamoxifen-resistant cell lines retained ERα expression but at a lower level compared to that in MCF-7. Importantly, we showed via ERα knockdown that the tamoxifen-resistant cells were dependent on functional ERα for growth and we observed a clear growth stimulation of resistant cell lines with clinically relevant concentrations of tamoxifen and 4-OH-tamoxifen, indicating that tamoxifen-resistant cells utilize agonistic ERα stimulation by tamoxifen for growth. The tamoxifen-resistant cells displayed high phosphorylation of ERα at Ser118 in the presence of tamoxifen; however, treatment with U0126 neither affected the level of Ser118 phosphorylation nor expression of the ERα target Bcl-2, suggesting that ERK contributes to cell growth independently of ERα in our cell model. In support of this, combined treatment against ERα and ERK signaling in resistant cells was superior to single-agent treatment and as effective as fulvestrant treatment of MCF-7 cells. Together, these findings demonstrate that ERα is a major driver of growth in tamoxifen-resistant cells supported by HER/ERK growth signaling, implying that combined targeting of these pathways may have a clinical potential for overcoming tamoxifen resistance.

Purpose: We evaluated the clinical benefit of tumor molecular profiling to select treatment in the phase I setting. Experimental Design: Patients with advanced solid cancers and exhausted treatment options referred to a phase I unit were included in a prospective, single-center, singlearm open-label study (NCT02290522). Tumor biopsies were obtained for comprehensive genomic analysis including whole-exome sequencing and RNA sequencing. When possible, patients were treated with regimen matched to the genomic profile. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: From May 2013 to January 2017, a total of 591 patients were enrolled, with 500 patients undergoing biopsy. Genomic profiles were obtained in 460 patients and a potential actionable target was identified in 352 (70%) of 500 biopsied patients. A total of 101 patients (20%) received matched treatment based on either gene mutations or RNA expression levels of targets available in early clinical trials or off-label treatment. Objective response according to RECIST1.1 was observed in 15 of 101 patients (0% complete response, 15% partial response), with a median PFS of 12 weeks (95% confidence interval, 9.9-14.4). Conclusions: Our study supports the feasibility of genomic profiling to select patients in the phase I setting and suggests that genomic matching can be beneficial for a minor subset of patients with no other treatment options. Randomized studies may validate this assumption. See related commentary by Ratain, p. 1136

To elucidate the molecular mechanisms of tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer, we performed gene array analyses and identified 366 genes with altered expression in four unique tamoxifen-resistant (TamR) cell lines vs the parental tamoxifen-sensitive MCF-7/S0.5 cell line. Most of these genes were functionally linked to cell proliferation, death and control of gene expression, and include FYN, PRKCA, ITPR1, DPYD, DACH1, LYN, GBP1 and PRLR. Treatment with FYN-specific small interfering RNA or a SRC family kinase inhibitor reduced cell growth of TamR cell lines while exerting no significant effect on MCF-7/S0.5 cells. Moreover, overexpression of FYN in parental tamoxifen-sensitive MCF-7/S0.5 cells resulted in reduced sensitivity to tamoxifen treatment, whereas knockdown of FYN in the FYN-overexpressing MCF-7/S0.5 cells restored sensitivity to tamoxifen, demonstrating growth- and survival-promoting function of FYN in MCF-7 cells. FYN knockdown in TamR cells led to reduced phosphorylation of 14-3-3 and Cdc25A, suggesting that FYN, by activation of important cell cycle-associated proteins, may overcome the anti-proliferative effects of tamoxifen. Evaluation of the subcellular localization of FYN in primary breast tumors from two cohorts of endocrine-treated ER+ breast cancer patients, one with advanced disease (N=47) and the other with early disease (N=76), showed that in the former, plasma membrane-associated FYN expression strongly correlated with longer progression-free survival (P<0.0002). Similarly, in early breast cancer patients, membrane-associated expression of FYN in the primary breast tumor was significantly associated with increased metastasis-free (P<0.04) and overall (P<0.004) survival independent of tumor size, grade or lymph node status. Our results indicate that FYN has an important role in tamoxifen resistance, and its subcellular localization in breast tumor cells may be an important novel biomarker of response to endocrine therapy in breast cancer.

Genomic screening of cancer patients for predisposing variants is traditionally based on age at onset, family history and type of cancer. Whereas the clinical guidelines have proven efficient in identifying families exhibiting classical attributes of hereditary cancer, the frequency of patients with alternative presentations is unclear. We identified and characterized germline variants in 636 patients with advanced solid cancer using whole exome sequencing. Pathogenic and likely pathogenic germline variants among 168 genes associated with hereditary cancer were considered. These variants were identified in 17.8% of the patients and within a wide range of cancer types. In particular, patients with mesothelioma, ovarian cancer, cervical cancer, urothelial cancer, and cancer of unknown primary origin displayed high frequencies of pathogenic variants. Variants were predominantly found in DNA-repair pathways and about half were within genes involved in homologous recombination repair. Twenty-two BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline variants were identified in 12 different cancer types, of which 10 (45%) were not previously identified in these patients based on the current clinical guidelines. Loss of heterozygosity and somatic second hits were identified in several of the affected genes, supporting possible causality for cancer development. A potential treatment target based on the pathogenic germline variant could be suggested in 25 patients (4%). The study demonstrates a high frequency of pathogenic germline variants in the homologous recombination pathway in patients with advanced solid cancers. We infer that genetic screening in this group of patients may reveal high-risk families and identify patients with potential PARP inhibitor sensitive tumors.

MCF-7 human breast cancer cells are relatively resistant to cisplatin treatment compared to other breast cancer cell lines. In order to identify possible targets for sensitizing the breast cancer cells to cisplatin treatment protein expression levels and the phosphorylation status of 27 different signaling proteins were examined. MCF-7 cells expressed high levels of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 protein relative to more cisplatin sensitive breast cancer cells. After cisplatin treatment a decrease in cyclin D1 was seen in all the breast cancer cells studied. Therefore, Bcl-2 and cyclin D1 were chosen as putative targets for increasing cell death and growth arrest induced by cisplatin, thereby enhancing the drug sensitivity in MCF-7. RNA interference, using Bcl-2-and cyclin D1-siRNAs sensitized MCF-7 cells to cisplatin treatment and by simultaneous knockdown of both Bcl-2 and cyclin D1 further sensitization was seen. This shows the potential of targeting both apoptotic-and cell cycle-regulating pathways to enhance the effect of chemotherapy.

No abstract

Cell-cycle transition from the G 2 phase into mitosis is regulated by the cyclin-dependent protein kinase 1 (CDK1) in complex with cyclin B. CDK1 activity is controlled by both inhibitory phosphorylation, catalysed by the Myt1 and Wee1 kinases, and activating dephosphorylation, mediated by the CDC25 dual-specificity phosphatase family members. In somatic cells, Wee1 is downregulated by phosphorylation and ubiquitin-mediated degradation to ensure rapid activation of CDK1 at the beginning of M phase. Here, we show that downregulation of the regulatory b-subunit of protein kinase CK2 by RNA interference results in delayed cell-cycle progression at the onset of mitosis. Knockdown of CK2b causes stabilization of Wee1 and increased phosphorylation of CDK1 at the inhibitory Tyr15. PLK1-Wee1 association is an essential event in the degradation of Wee1 in unperturbed cell cycle. We have found that CK2b participates in PLK1-Wee1 complex formation whereas its cellular depletion leads to disruption of PLK1-Wee1 interaction and reduced Wee1 phosphorylation at Ser53 and 121. The data reported here reinforce the notion that CK2b has functions that are independent of its role as the CK2 regulatory subunit, identifying it as a new component of signaling pathways that regulate cell-cycle progression at the entry of mitosis.