Direct comparison of the hepatoma cell lines HepG2 and HepaRG has previously been performed by only evaluating a limited set of genes or proteins. In this study, we examined the whole-genome gene expression of both cell lines before and after exposure to the genotoxic (GTX) carcinogens aflatoxin B1 and benzo[a]pyrene and the nongenotoxic (NGTX) carcinogens cyclosporin A, 17beta-estradiol, and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-para-dioxin for 12 and 48 h. Before exposure, this analysis revealed an extensive network of genes and pathways, which were regulated differentially for each cell line. The comparison of the basal gene expression between HepG2, HepaRG, primary human hepatocytes (PHH), and liver clearly showed that HepaRG resembles PHH and liver the most. After exposure to the GTX and NGTX carcinogens, for both cell lines, common pathways were found that are important in carcinogenesis, for example, cell cycle regulation and apoptosis. However, also clear differences between exposed HepG2 and HepaRG were observed, and these are related to common metabolic processes, immune response, and transcription processes. Furthermore, HepG2 performs better in discriminating between GTX and NGTX carcinogens. In conclusion, these results have shown that HepaRG is a more suited in vitro liver model for biological interpretations of the effects of exposure to chemicals, whereas HepG2 is a more promising in vitro liver model for classification studies using the toxicogenomics approach. Although, it should be noted that only five carcinogens were used in this study.

The lack of accurate in vitro assays for predicting in vivo toxicity of chemicals together with new legislations demanding replacement and reduction of animal testing has triggered the development of alternative methods. This study aimed at developing a transcriptomics-based in vitro prediction assay for in vivo genotoxicity. Transcriptomics changes induced in the human liver cell line HepG2 by 34 compounds after treatment for 12, 24, and 48 h were used for the selection of gene-sets that are capable of discriminating between in vivo genotoxins (GTX) and in vivo nongenotoxins (NGTX). By combining transcriptomics with publicly available results for these chemicals from standard in vitro genotoxicity studies, we developed several prediction models. These models were validated by using an additional set of 28 chemicals. The best prediction was achieved after stratification of chemicals according to results from the Ames bacterial gene mutation assay prior to transcriptomics evaluation after 24h of treatment. A total of 33 genes were selected for discriminating GTX from NGTX for Ames-positive chemicals and 22 for Ames-negative chemicals. Overall, this method resulted in 89% accuracy and 91% specificity, thereby clearly outperforming the standard in vitro test battery. Transcription factor network analysis revealed HNF3a, HNF4a, HNF6, androgen receptor, and SP1 as main factors regulating the expression of classifiers for Ames-positive chemicals. Thus, the classical bacterial gene mutation assay in combination with in vitro transcriptomics in HepG2 is proposed as an upgraded in vitro approach for predicting in vivo genotoxicity of chemicals holding a great promise for reducing animal experimentations on genotoxicity.

The γH2AX assay has recently been suggested as a new in vitro assay for detecting genotoxic (GTX) properties of chemicals. This assay is based on the phosphorylation of H2AX histone in response to DNA damage [i.e. induction of double-strand breaks (DSBs)]. Quantification of γH2AX foci using flow cytometry can rapidly detect DNA damage induced by chemicals that cause DNA DSBs. Up to now, only few compounds have been tested with this assay. The main goal of this study was to compare the performance of this automated γH2AX assay with that of standard in vitro genotoxicity assays in predicting in vivo genotoxicity. HepG2 cells were exposed to 64 selected compounds with known GTX properties and subsequently analysed for induction of γH2AX foci. The results of this assay were compared with public data from standard in vitro genotoxicity tests. Accuracy, sensitivity and specificity in predicting in vivo genotoxicity, using the γH2AX assay alone or in combinations with conventional assays, were calculated. Both the γH2AX assay and the bacterial mutagenicity test (Ames) were highly specific for in vivo GTX, whereas chromosomal aberration/micronucleus test (CA/MN) resulted in highest sensitivity. The currently widely used in vitro genotoxicity test battery-Ames test, mouse lymphoma assay (MLA) and CA/MN test-resulted in low accuracy (55-65%) to predict in vivo genotoxicity. Interestingly, the inclusion of γH2AX assay in the standard battery, instead of MLA assay, resulted in higher accuracy (62-70%) compared with other combinations. Advantage of the γH2AX assay in HepG2 cells is its high sensitivity to detect DNA-reactive GTX compounds, although the reduced sensitivity for compounds that require metabolic activation needs to be improved. In conclusion, the automated γH2AX assay can be a useful, fast and cost-effective human cell-based tool for early screening of compounds for in vivo genotoxicity.

The conventional in vitro assays for genotoxicity assessment of chemicals are characterised by a high false-positive rate, thus failing to correctly predict their in vivo genotoxic effects. This study aimed to identify the cellular mechanisms induced by the false-positive genotoxins quercetin, 8-Hydroxyquinoline and 17-beta oestradiol in comparison to true genotoxins and non-genotoxins, by combining in vitro phenotypic parameters with transcriptomics data from HepG2 cells. The effects of these compounds on the phosphorylation of H2AX, cell cycle distribution and whole genome gene expression following treatment for 12, 24 and 48 h were compared with the effects of true genotoxins [benzo[a]pyrene and aflatoxin B1] and non-genotoxins (2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzodioxin, cyclosporin A and ampicillin C). Quercetin induced similar phenotypic effects as true genotoxins and to some extent similar gene expression alterations. Different gene expression changes were also observed, including the up-regulation of DNA repair-related genes. 8-Hydroxyquinoline and 17-beta oestradiol showed no similarities to the true genotoxins at both the phenotypic and the transcriptomic level. In a classification approach, classifiers were selected to discriminate between genotoxins and non-genotoxins. Subsequent analysis for the false-positive compounds showed quercetin to be predicted as genotoxic and 8-hydroxyquinoline and 17-beta oestradiol as non-genotoxic. Our results support that transcriptomics analysis of compound effects in HepG2 leads to similar results with phenotypic analysis and provides additional mechanistic information. Therefore, combined evaluation of gene expression alterations and relevant functional end points using HepG2 cells may contribute to the better understanding of modes-of-action of chemicals and the correct evaluation of their genotoxic properties.

BackgroundThe integration of different 'omics' technologies has already been shown in several in vivo studies to offer a complementary insight into cellular responses to toxic challenges. Being interested in developing in vitro cellular models as alternative to animal-based toxicity assays, we hypothesize that combining transcriptomics and metabonomics data improves the understanding of molecular mechanisms underlying the effects caused by a toxic compound also in vitro in human cells. To test this hypothesis, and with the focus on non-genotoxic carcinogenesis as an endpoint of toxicity, in the present study, the human hepatocarcinoma cell line HepG2 was exposed to the well-known environmental carcinogen 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD).ResultsTranscriptomics as well as metabonomics analyses demonstrated changes in TCDD-exposed HepG2 in common metabolic processes, e.g. amino acid metabolism, of which some of the changes only being confirmed if both 'omics' were integrated. In particular, this integrated analysis identified unique pathway maps involved in receptor-mediated mechanisms, such as the G-protein coupled receptor protein (GPCR) signaling pathway maps, in which the significantly up-regulated gene son of sevenless 1 (SOS1) seems to play an important role. SOS1 is an activator of several members of the RAS superfamily, a group of small GTPases known for their role in carcinogenesis.ConclusionsThe results presented here were not only comparable with other in vitro studies but also with in vivo studies. Moreover, new insights on the molecular responses caused by TCDD exposure were gained by the cross-omics analysis.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract