Precision agriculture provides important issues toward a more sustainable agriculture. Many farmers have the necessary technology to operate site-specifically, but they do not use it in practice, and thus available information and communications technology (ICT) systems are not used to their full potential. This paper addresses how to reduce the so-called ''problem of implementation'', based on the knowledge that participatory approaches during the design and development process is one of the most important factors to frame technology adoption. The development of sustainable ICT systems through theories and methodologies from the fields of human computer interaction and user-centered design (UCD) is presented and an ongoing Swedish project for development of an agricultural decision support system (AgriDSS) for nitrogen fertilization is used as an example to frame the issue. The overreaching aim is to develop AgriDSSs that are sustainable in design as well as through design by stressing the importance of participatory approaches for the successful development of AgriDSSs. The Swedish project has the intention to apply a UCD approach, and some pitfalls on starting to use this way of working is identified as well as some suggestions on how to reduce them through co-learning processes. Despite the challenges presented in this paper, ICT can contribute significantly to long-term sustainable development. Thus, several competences and scientific disciplines need to act in concert to help develop a sustainable development of agriculture via a transdisciplinary approach that can make an impact on society at many levels.
We studied C and N mineralisation patterns from a large number of plant materials (76 samples, covering 37 species and several plant parts), and quantified how these patterns related to biological origin and selected indicators of chemical composition. We determined C and N contents of whole plant material, in water soluble material and in fractions (neutral detergent soluble material, cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin) obtained by stepwise chemical digestion (modified van Soest method). Plant materials were incubated in a sandy soil under standardised conditions (15°C, optimal water content, no N limitation) for 217 days, and CO 2 evolution and soil mineral N contents were monitored regularly. The chemical composition of the plant materials was very diverse, as indicated by total N ranging from 2 to 59 mg N g )1 , (i.e. C/N-ratios between 7 and 227). Few materials were lignified (median lignin ¼ 4% of total C). A large proportion of plant N was found in the neutral detergent soluble (NDS) fraction (average 84%) but less of the plant C (average 46%). Over the entire incubation period, holocellulose C content was the single factor that best explained the variability of C mineralisation (r ¼ )0.73 to )0.82).Overall, lignin C explained only a small proportion of the variability in C mineralisation (r ¼ )0.44 to )0.51), but the higher the lignin content, the narrower the range of cumulative C mineralisation. Initial net N mineralisation rate was most closely correlated (r ¼ 0.76) to water soluble N content of the plant materials, but from Day 22, net N mineralisation was most closely correlated to total plant N and NDS-N contents (r varied between 0.90 and 0.94). The NDS-N content could thus be used to roughly categorise the net N mineralisation patterns into (i) sustained net N immobilisation for several months; (ii) initial net N immobilisation, followed by some re-mineralisation; and (iii) initially rapid and substantial net N mineralisation. Contrary to other studies, we did not find plant residue C/N or lignin/N-ratio to be closely correlated to decomposition and N mineralisation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.