Dams are recognised to impact aquatic biodiversity, but the effects and conclusions diverge across studies and locations. By using a meta‐analytical approach, we quantified the effects of impoundment on fish communities distributed across three large biomes. The impacts of dams on richness and diversity differed across biomes, with significant declines in the tropics, lower amplitude but similar directional changes in temperate regions, and no changes in boreal regions. Our analyses showed that non‐native species increased significantly in tropical and temperate regulated rivers, but not in boreal rivers. In contrast, temporal trajectories in fish assemblage metrics were common across regions, with all biomes showing an increase in mean trophic level position and in the proportion of generalist species after impoundment. Such changes in fish assemblages may affect food web stability and merit closer study. Across the literature examined, predominant mechanisms that render fish assemblages susceptible to impacts from dams were: (1) the transformation of the lotic environment into a lentic environment; (2) habitat fragmentation and (3) the introduction of non‐native species. Collectively, our results highlight that an understanding of the regional context and a suite of community metrics are needed to make robust predictions about how fish will respond to river impoundments.

Dams are recognized to impact aquatic biodiversity and ecosystem functions, but the magnitude of effects vary across studies. By using a meta-analytical approach, we examined the effects of impoundment on fish community across three large biomes. The impacts of dams on richness and diversity differed across biomes, with significant declines in the tropics, lower amplitude but similar directional changes in temperate reservoirs, and no changes in boreal reservoirs. Our analysis also showed that non-native species increased significantly in tropical and temperate reservoirs, but not in boreal reservoirs. In contrast, temporal trajectories in fish assemblage metrics were common across regions, with all biomes showing an increase in mean trophic position and in the proportion of generalist species after impoundment. Such changes in fish assemblages may affect food web stability and merit closer study. Across the literature examined, predominant factors or mechanisms that render fish assemblages susceptible to impacts from dams were: 1) the transformation of the lotic environment into a lentic environment; 2) habitat fragmentation and 3) invasive or non-native species. Collectively our results highlight that an understanding of the regional context and a suite of metrics are needed to make robust predictions about how fish will respond to river impoundments.

No abstract

No abstract

River flow regulation, fragmentation, and changes in water quality caused by dams have varying effects on aquatic biodiversity and ecosystem functions, but are not clearly resolved in boreal ecosystems. We adopted a multiscale approach to quantify fish community trajectories over 20 years using a network of sites spread across four reservoirs in two hydroelectricity complexes in northern Quebec, where other anthropogenic factors have been negligible. Across three spatial scales, we found little evidence of directional temporal trends in diversity relative to reference sites. Using beta-diversity analyses, we also detected a high degree of stability in fish composition over time and space at the complex and reservoir scales. However, changes in species assemblage following impoundment were detected at the scale of the sampling station. At this scale, we found that some species consistently benefited (coregonids and pikes) from impoundment, whereas others were detrimentally affected (suckers and one salmonid). Overall, we conclude that examining different scales is key when trying to understand the impacts of humans on biodiversity and in formulating management recommendations.