Laser-induced interstitial thermotherapy (LITT) surveyed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been shown to be effective in various applications. The laser treatment of colorectal liver metastases usually requires a separate device (e.g., ultrasound or CT) to position the laser applicator. In this study, we used an interventional 0.5 T MRI system, allowing both the navigation to the target tissue and on-line thermometry. Laser irradiation was performed using a near-infrared laser source combined with a cooled laser light guide. We treated 20 patients exhibiting a total of 58 colorectal liver metastases. Clinically relevant complications did not occur. No residual tumor was observed after laser irradiation in all metastases with a diameter below 2 cm. Metastases with a mean diameter between 2 and 3 cm demonstrated total necrosis in 71%, while in larger tumors this proportion decreased to 46% (diameter, 3-4 cm) and 30% (diameter, >4 cm), respectively. We conclude that LITT, guided by the employed interventional MRI system, is feasible and safe. The results suggest a more aggressive treatment, especially for larger metastases. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2001;13: 729 -737.

BackgroundTo systematically review all available studies of operatively treated proximal tibia fractures and to report the incidence of superficial or deep infection and subsequent outcomes.MethodsA systematic review of the literature in Medline, Cochrane, Embase and GoogleScholar was conducted to identify studies with cohorts of patients with infection after surgical treatment of proximal tibia fractures. Studies were included according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The studies were analysed for methodological deficiencies and quality of outcome reporting based on the Level of Evidence (LOE) and Coleman Methodology Scoring (CMS.)ResultsIn total 32 studies were included. There was heterogeneity between the studies, in terms of subject of the studies, outcome criteria, fracture type and classification, surgical techniques and length of follow-up. Therefore, no meta-analysis could be performed. The average CMS was 54.2 (range 36–75). The included studies were 25 case series (LOE IV), 6 were prospective cohort studies (LOE III) and one was a prospective randomized trial (LOE I). 203 (12.3%, range: 2.6–45.0%) infections occurred in the overall population (n = 2063). Those were divided into 129 deep infections and 74 superficial infections. Revision due to infection was reported in 29 studies, microbiological results in 6, respectively. 72 (55,8%) of 129 cases reporting outcome after deep infection had an unsatisfactory outcome with substantial limitations of the affected joint and leg.ConclusionsPostoperative infections are a challenge, sometimes requiring several revisions and often with a worse outcome. Further studies with structured study protocols should be performed for a better understanding of risk factors to improve treatment outcomes.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) have been regarded as rare tumor manifestations of the mesenchymal tissue fraction of the intestinal building principle; however, this tumor is now established as an independent tumor entity owing to independent immunohistochemical and ultrastructural characteristics. In spite of increasing awareness of their biological behavior and their molecular-biological basis, evaluating the grade of many of these tumors remains open, not only on a preoperative but also on a postoperative basis. Thus, how radical the surgical procedure must be is not standardized, as it is in carcinoma surgery. The literature available today is not sufficient to make a valid analytical assumption possible because of small numbers of cases and the heterogeneity of clinical and pathological variables. Therefore, recommendations concerning oncological-surgical radicality have at this time an empirical character. Owing to the rarity of the tumor, this will probably not change in the near future. Adjuvant therapeutical treatment of relevant effectiveness does not exist. Therefore, the radicalness of the operation is organ-specific, tumor-specific and based on tumor-biological criteria.

Background: Different indications and treatment options for combined injuries to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and medial collateral ligament complex (MCL) are not clearly defined. Purpose: To perform a modified Delphi process with the Committee for Ligament Injuries of the German Knee Society (DKG) in order to structure and optimize the process of treating a combined injury to the ACL and MCL. Study Design: Consensus statement. Methods: Scientific questions and answers were created based on a comprehensive literature review using the central registers for controlled studies of Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane including the terms medial collateral ligament, anterior cruciate ligament, MCL, ACL, and outcome used in various combinations. The obtained statements passed 3 cycles of a modified Delphi process during which each was readjusted and rated according to the available evidence (grades A-E) by the members of the DKG Ligament Injuries Committee and its registered guests. Results: The majority of answers, including several questions with >1 graded answer, were evaluated as grade E (n = 16) or C (n = 10), indicating that a low level of scientific evidence was available for most of the answers. Only 5 answers were graded better than C: 3 answers with a grade of A and 2 answers with a grade of B. Only 1 answer was evaluated as grade D. An agreement of >80% (range, 83%-100%) among committee members was achieved for all statements. Conclusion: The results of this modified Delphi process offer a guideline for standardized patient care in cases of combined injuries to the ACL and MCL.

Purpose The aim of this consensus project was to validate which endogenous and exogenous factors contribute to the development of post-traumatic osteoarthritis and to what extent ACL (anterior cruciate ligament) reconstruction can prevent secondary damage to the knee joint. Based on these findings, an algorithm for the management after ACL rupture should be established. Methods The consensus project was initiated by the Ligament Injuries Committee of the German Knee Society (Deutsche Kniegesellschaft, DKG). A modified Delphi process was used to answer scientific questions. This process was based on key topic complexes previously formed during an initial face-to-face meeting of the steering group with the expert group. For each key topic, a comprehensive review of available literature was performed by the steering group. The results of the literature review were sent to the rating group with the option to give anonymous comments until a final consensus voting was performed. Consensus was defined a-priori as eighty percent agreement. Results Of the 17 final statements, 15 achieved consensus, and 2 have not reached consensus. Results of the consensus were summarized in an algorithm for the management after ACL rupture (infographic/Fig. 2). Conclusion This consensus process has shown that the development of post-traumatic osteoarthritis is a complex multifactorial process. Exogenous (primary and secondary meniscus lesions) and endogenous factors (varus deformity) play a decisive role. Due to the complex interplay of these factors, an ACL reconstruction cannot always halt post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the knee. However, there is evidence that ACL reconstruction can prevent secondary joint damage such as meniscus lesions and that the success of meniscus repair is higher with simultaneous ACL reconstruction. Therefore, we recommend ACL reconstruction in case of a combined injury of the ACL and a meniscus lesion which is suitable for repair. Level of evidence Level V.