SummaryA major challenge of plant biology is to unravel the genetic basis of complex traits. We took advantage of recent technical advances in high‐throughput phenotyping in conjunction with genome‐wide association studies to elucidate genotype–phenotype relationships at high temporal resolution. A diverse Brassica napus population from a commercial breeding programme was analysed by automated non‐invasive phenotyping. Time‐resolved data for early growth‐related traits, including estimated biovolume, projected leaf area, early plant height and colour uniformity, were established and complemented by fresh and dry weight biomass. Genome‐wide SNP array data provided the framework for genome‐wide association analyses. Using time point data and relative growth rates, multiple robust main effect marker–trait associations for biomass and related traits were detected. Candidate genes involved in meristem development, cell wall modification and transcriptional regulation were detected. Our results demonstrate that early plant growth is a highly complex trait governed by several medium and many small effect loci, most of which act only during short phases. These observations highlight the importance of taking the temporal patterns of QTL/allele actions into account and emphasize the need for detailed time‐resolved analyses to effectively unravel the complex and stage‐specific contributions of genes affecting growth processes that operate at different developmental phases.

The Brassica napus 60K Illumina Infinium™ SNP array has had huge international uptake in the rapeseed community due to the revolutionary speed of acquisition and ease of analysis of this high-throughput genotyping data, particularly when coupled with the newly available reference genome sequence. However, further utilization of this valuable resource can be optimized by better understanding the promises and pitfalls of SNP arrays. We outline how best to analyze Brassica SNP marker array data for diverse applications, including linkage and association mapping, genetic diversity and genomic introgression studies. We present data on which SNPs are locus-specific in winter, semi-winter and spring B. napus germplasm pools, rather than amplifying both an A-genome and a C-genome locus or multiple loci. Common issues that arise when analyzing array data will be discussed, particularly those unique to SNP markers and how to deal with these for practical applications in Brassica breeding applications.

Over the last two decades, the application of genomic selection has been extensively studied in various crop species, and it has become a common practice to report prediction accuracies using cross validation. However, genomic prediction accuracies obtained from random cross validation can be strongly inflated due to population or family structure, a characteristic shared by many breeding populations. An understanding of the effect of population and family structure on prediction accuracy is essential for the successful application of genomic selection in plant breeding programs. The objective of this study was to make this effect and its implications for practical breeding programs comprehensible for breeders and scientists with a limited background in quantitative genetics and genomic selection theory. We, therefore, compared genomic prediction accuracies obtained from different random cross validation approaches and within-family prediction in three different prediction scenarios. We used a highly structured population of 940 Brassica napus hybrids coming from 46 testcross families and two subpopulations. Our demonstrations show how genomic prediction accuracies obtained from among-family predictions in random cross validation and within-family predictions capture different measures of prediction accuracy. While among-family prediction accuracy measures prediction accuracy of both the parent average component and the Mendelian sampling term, within-family prediction only measures how accurately the Mendelian sampling term can be predicted. With this paper we aim to foster a critical approach to different measures of genomic prediction accuracy and a careful analysis of values observed in genomic selection experiments and reported in literature.

In order to meet future food, feed, fiber, and bioenergy demands, global yields of all major crops need to be increased significantly. At the same time, the increasing frequency of extreme weather events such as heat and drought necessitates improvements in the environmental resilience of modern crop cultivars. Achieving sustainably increase yields implies rapid improvement of quantitative traits with a very complex genetic architecture and strong environmental interaction. Latest advances in genome analysis technologies today provide molecular information at an ultrahigh resolution, revolutionizing crop genomic research, and paving the way for advanced quantitative genetic approaches. These include highly detailed assessment of population structure and genotypic diversity, facilitating the identification of selective sweeps and signatures of directional selection, dissection of genetic variants that underlie important agronomic traits, and genomic selection (GS) strategies that not only consider major-effect genes. Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers today represent the genotyping system of choice for crop genetic studies because they occur abundantly in plant genomes and are easy to detect. SNPs are typically biallelic, however, hence their information content compared to multiallelic markers is low, limiting the resolution at which SNP–trait relationships can be delineated. An efficient way to overcome this limitation is to construct haplotypes based on linkage disequilibrium, one of the most important features influencing genetic analyses of crop genomes. Here, we give an overview of the latest advances in genomics-based haplotype analyses in crops, highlighting their importance in the context of polyploidy and genome evolution, linkage drag, and co-selection. We provide examples of how haplotype analyses can complement well-established quantitative genetics frameworks, such as quantitative trait analysis and GS, ultimately providing an effective tool to equip modern crops with environment-tailored characteristics.

Genomic selection (GS) has revolutionized breeding for quantitative traits in plants, offering potential to optimize resource allocation in breeding programs and increase genetic gain per unit of time. Modern high-density single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays comprising up to several hundred thousand markers provide a user-friendly technology to characterize the genetic constitution of whole populations and for implementing GS in breeding programs. However, GS does not build upon detailed genotype profiling facilitated by maximum marker density. With extensive genome-wide linkage disequilibrium (LD) being a common characteristic of breeding pools, fewer representative markers from available high-density genotyping platforms could be sufficient to capture the association between a genomic region and a phenotypic trait. To examine the effects of reduced marker density on genomic prediction accuracy, we collected data on three traits across 2 yr in a panel of 203 homozygous Chinese semiwinter rapeseed ( L.) inbred lines, broadly encompassing allelic variability in the Asian genepool. We investigated two approaches to selecting subsets of markers: a trait-dependent strategy based on genome-wide association study (GWAS) significance thresholds and a trait-independent method to detect representative tag SNPs. Prediction accuracies were evaluated using cross-validation with ridge-regression best linear unbiased predictions (rrBLUP). With semiwinter rapeseed as a model species, we demonstrate that low-density marker sets comprising a few hundred to a few thousand markers enable high prediction accuracies in breeding populations with strong LD comparable to those achieved with high-density arrays. Our results are valuable for facilitating routine application of cost-efficient GS in breeding programs.

Genomic prediction using the Brassica 60 k genotyping array is efficient in oilseed rape hybrids. Prediction accuracy is more dependent on trait complexity than on the prediction model. In oilseed rape breeding programs, performance prediction of parental combinations is of fundamental importance. Due to the phenomenon of heterosis, per se performance is not a reliable indicator for F-hybrid performance, and selection of well-paired parents requires the testing of large quantities of hybrid combinations in extensive field trials. However, the number of potential hybrids, in general, dramatically exceeds breeding capacity and budget. Integration of genomic selection (GS) could substantially increase the number of potential combinations that can be evaluated. GS models can be used to predict the performance of untested individuals based only on their genotypic profiles, using marker effects previously predicted in a training population. This allows for a preselection of promising genotypes, enabling a more efficient allocation of resources. In this study, we evaluated the usefulness of the Illumina Brassica 60 k SNP array for genomic prediction and compared three alternative approaches based on a homoscedastic ridge regression BLUP and three Bayesian prediction models that considered general and specific combining ability (GCA and SCA, respectively). A total of 448 hybrids were produced in a commercial breeding program from unbalanced crosses between 220 paternal doubled haploid lines and five male-sterile testers. Predictive ability was evaluated for seven agronomic traits. We demonstrate that the Brassica 60 k genotyping array is an adequate and highly valuable platform to implement genomic prediction of hybrid performance in oilseed rape. Furthermore, we present first insights into the application of established statistical models for prediction of important agronomical traits with contrasting patterns of polygenic control.

Background Backfat thickness is an important carcass composition trait for pork production and is commonly included in swine breeding programmes. In this paper, we report the results of a large genome-wide association study for backfat thickness using data from eight lines of diverse genetic backgrounds. Methods Data comprised 275,590 pigs from eight lines with diverse genetic backgrounds (breeds included Large White, Landrace, Pietrain, Hampshire, Duroc, and synthetic lines) genotyped and imputed for 71,324 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). For each line, we estimated SNP associations using a univariate linear mixed model that accounted for genomic relationships. SNPs with significant associations were identified using a threshold of p < 10–6 and used to define genomic regions of interest. The proportion of genetic variance explained by a genomic region was estimated using a ridge regression model. Results We found significant associations with backfat thickness for 264 SNPs across 27 genomic regions. Six genomic regions were detected in three or more lines. The average estimate of the SNP-based heritability was 0.48, with estimates by line ranging from 0.30 to 0.58. The genomic regions jointly explained from 3.2 to 19.5% of the additive genetic variance of backfat thickness within a line. Individual genomic regions explained up to 8.0% of the additive genetic variance of backfat thickness within a line. Some of these 27 genomic regions also explained up to 1.6% of the additive genetic variance in lines for which the genomic region was not statistically significant. We identified 64 candidate genes with annotated functions that can be related to fat metabolism, including well-studied genes such as MC4R, IGF2, and LEPR, and more novel candidate genes such as DHCR7, FGF23, MEDAG, DGKI, and PTN. Conclusions Our results confirm the polygenic architecture of backfat thickness and the role of genes involved in energy homeostasis, adipogenesis, fatty acid metabolism, and insulin signalling pathways for fat deposition in pigs. The results also suggest that several less well-understood metabolic pathways contribute to backfat development, such as those of phosphate, calcium, and vitamin D homeostasis.

Key message Complementing or replacing genetic markers with transcriptomic data and use of reproducing kernel Hilbert space regression based on Gaussian kernels increases hybrid prediction accuracies for complex agronomic traits in canola. In plant breeding, hybrids gained particular importance due to heterosis, the superior performance of offspring compared to their inbred parents. Since the development of new top performing hybrids requires labour-intensive and costly breeding programmes, including testing of large numbers of experimental hybrids, the prediction of hybrid performance is of utmost interest to plant breeders. In this study, we tested the effectiveness of hybrid prediction models in spring-type oilseed rape (Brassica napus L./canola) employing different omics profiles, individually and in combination. To this end, a population of 950 F1 hybrids was evaluated for seed yield and six other agronomically relevant traits in commercial field trials at several locations throughout Europe. A subset of these hybrids was also evaluated in a climatized glasshouse regarding early biomass production. For each of the 477 parental rapeseed lines, 13,201 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), 154 primary metabolites, and 19,479 transcripts were determined and used as predictive variables. Both, SNP markers and transcripts, effectively predict hybrid performance using (genomic) best linear unbiased prediction models (gBLUP). Compared to models using pure genetic markers, models incorporating transcriptome data resulted in significantly higher prediction accuracies for five out of seven agronomic traits, indicating that transcripts carry important information beyond genomic data. Notably, reproducing kernel Hilbert space regression based on Gaussian kernels significantly exceeded the predictive abilities of gBLUP models for six of the seven agronomic traits, demonstrating its potential for implementation in future canola breeding programmes.