BackgroundIn climacteric fruit-bearing species, the onset of fruit ripening is marked by a transient rise in respiration rate and autocatalytic ethylene production, followed by rapid deterioration in fruit quality. In non-climacteric species, there is no increase in respiration or ethylene production at the beginning or during fruit ripening. Melon is unusual in having climacteric and non-climacteric varieties, providing an interesting model system to compare both ripening types. Transcriptomic analysis of developing melon fruits from Védrantais and Dulce (climacteric) and Piel de sapo and PI 161375 (non-climacteric) varieties was performed to understand the molecular mechanisms that differentiate the two fruit ripening types.ResultsFruits were harvested at 15, 25, 35 days after pollination and at fruit maturity. Transcript profiling was performed using an oligo-based microarray with 75 K probes. Genes linked to characteristic traits of fruit ripening were differentially expressed between climacteric and non-climacteric types, as well as several transcription factor genes and genes encoding enzymes involved in sucrose catabolism. The expression patterns of some genes in PI 161375 fruits were either intermediate between. Piel de sapo and the climacteric varieties, or more similar to the latter. PI 161375 fruits also accumulated some carotenoids, a characteristic trait of climacteric varieties.ConclusionsSimultaneous changes in transcript abundance indicate that there is coordinated reprogramming of gene expression during fruit development and at the onset of ripening in both climacteric and non-climacteric fruits. The expression patterns of genes related to ethylene metabolism, carotenoid accumulation, cell wall integrity and transcriptional regulation varied between genotypes and was consistent with the differences in their fruit ripening characteristics. There were differences between climacteric and non-climacteric varieties in the expression of genes related to sugar metabolism suggesting that they may be potential determinants of sucrose content and post-harvest stability of sucrose levels in fruit. Several transcription factor genes were also identified that were differentially expressed in both types, implicating them in regulation of ripening behaviour. The intermediate nature of PI 161375 suggested that classification of melon fruit ripening behaviour into just two distinct types is an over-simplification, and that in reality there is a continuous spectrum of fruit ripening behaviour.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-015-1649-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The increasing use of 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) to extend the commercial life of fruit constitutes an attractive way of improving packing house competitiveness. This compound prevents the effects of ethylene in a wide range of fruit and vegetables. However, despite the extensive literature relating to this action on ethylene, little is known about its other physiological effects. In this work, pears (Pyrus malus L cv Blanquilla) were treated with 100 ppb 1-MCP immediately after harvest and stored in air for 5 months. Differences in oxidative stress and in antioxidant potential between controls and 1-MCP-treated fruits were established, determining the changes in the levels of hydrogen peroxide, ascorbate content and ionic leakage during storage. Activities of the H 2 O 2 -generating enzyme superoxide dismutase (EC 1.15.11) and the H 2 O 2 -scavenging enzymes catalase (EC 1.11.1.6), ascorbate peroxidase (EC 1.11.1.11) and unspecific peroxidase (EC 1.11.1.7) were also determined. 1-MCP-treated fruits exhibited lower levels of hydrogen peroxide, ascorbate and lower ionic leakage during storage. In accordance with this result, 1-MCP-treated fruits also exhibited higher enzymatic antioxidant potential. These results challenge the hypothesis that the beneficial effects of 1-MCP on ripening were not exclusively due to its action on ethylene but also to an increase in antioxidant potential in pear.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract