No abstract

The progressive failure of protein homeostasis is a hallmark of aging and a common feature in neurodegenerative disease. As the enzymes executing the final stages of autophagy, lysosomal proteases are key contributors to the maintenance of protein homeostasis with age. We previously reported that expression of granulin peptides, the cleavage products of the neurodegenerative disease protein progranulin, enhance the accumulation and toxicity of TAR DNA binding protein 43 (TDP-43) in Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans). In this study we show that C. elegans granulins are produced in an age-and stress-dependent manner. Granulins localize to the endolysosomal compartment where they impair lysosomal protease expression and activity. Consequently, protein homeostasis is disrupted, promoting the nuclear translocation of the lysosomal transcription factor HLH-30/TFEB, and prompting cells to activate a compensatory transcriptional program. The three C. elegans granulin peptides exhibited distinct but overlapping functional effects in our assays, which may be due to amino acid composition that results in distinct electrostatic and hydrophobicity profiles. Our results support a model in which granulin production modulates a critical transition between the normal, physiological regulation of protease activity and the impairment of lysosomal function that can occur with age and disease.

Mutations in Cu/Zn-superoxide dismutase (SOD1) gene are linked to 10-20% of familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (fALS) cases. The mutations cause misfolding and self-assembly of SOD1 into toxic oligomers and aggregates, resulting in motor neuron degeneration. The molecular mechanisms underlying SOD1 aggregation and toxicity are unclear. Characterization of misfolded SOD1 is particularly challenging because of its metastable nature. Antibodies against misfolded SOD1 are useful tools for this purpose, provided their specificity and selectivity are well-characterized. Here, we characterized three recently introduced antimisfolded SOD1 antibodies and compared them with two commercial, antimisfolded SOD1 antibodies raised against the fALS-linked variant G93A-SOD1. As controls, we compared the reactivity of these antibodies to two polyclonal anti-SOD1 antibodies expected to be insensitive to misfolding. We asked to what extent the antibodies could distinguish between WT and variant SOD1 and between native and misfolded conformations. WT, G93A-SOD1, or E100K-SOD1 were incubated under aggregation-promoting conditions and monitored using thioflavin-T fluorescence, electron microscopy, and dot blots. WT and G93A-SOD1 also were analyzed using native-PAGE/Western blot. The new antimisfolded SOD1 and the commercial antibody B8H10 showed variable reactivity using dot blots but generally showed maximum reactivity at the time misfolded SOD1 oligomers were expected to be most abundant. In contrast, only B8H10 and the control antibodies were reactive in Western blots. Unexpectedly, the polyclonal antibodies showed strong preference for the misfolded form of G93A-SOD1 in dot blots. Surprisingly, antimisfolded SOD1 antibody C4F6 was specific for the apo form of G93A-SOD1 but insensitive to misfolding. Antibody 10C12 showed preference for early misfolded structures, whereas 3H1 bound preferentially to late structures. These new antibodies allow distinction between putative early- and late-forming prefibrillar SOD1 oligomers.

Small‐molecule inhibitors of abnormal protein self‐assembly are promising candidates for developing therapy against proteinopathies. Such compounds have been examined primarily as inhibitors of amyloid β‐protein (Aβ), whereas testing of inhibitors of other amyloidogenic proteins has lagged behind. An important issue with screening compound libraries is that although an inhibitor suitable for therapy must be both effective and nontoxic, typical screening focuses on efficacy, whereas safety typically is tested at a later stage using cells and/or animals. In addition, typical thioflavin T (ThT)‐fluorescence‐based screens use the final fluorescence value as a readout, potentially missing important kinetic information. Here, we examined potential inhibitors of superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) using ThT‐fluorescence including the different phases of fluorescence change and added a parallel screen of SOD1 activity as a potential proxy for compound toxicity. Some compounds previously reported to inhibit other amyloidogenic proteins also inhibited SOD1 aggregation at low micromolar concentrations, whereas others were ineffective. Analysis of the lag phase and exponential slope added important information that could help exclude false‐positive or false‐negative results. SOD1 was highly resistant to inhibition of its activity, and therefore, did not have the necessary sensitivity to serve as a proxy for examining potential toxicity.