No abstract

Background. This study reports the epidemiologic features, survival rates, and neurologic outcomes of the largest population-based series of pediatric out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest patients with prospectively collected data. Methods. Secondary analysis of data from a prospective, interventional trial of out-of-hospital pediatric airway management conducted from 1994 to 1997 (Gausche M, Lewis RJ, Stratton SJ, et al. JAMA. 2000;283:783-790). Consecutive out-of-hospital patients from 2 large urban counties in California <12 years old or 40 kg in bodyweight who were determined by paramedics to be pulseless and apneic were included. Main outcome measures included survival to hospital discharge, patient demographics, arrest etiology, arrest rhythm, event intervals, and neurologic outcomes. Results. In 599 patients, 601 events were studied (54% were <1 year old, 58% were male). Return of spontaneous circulation was achieved in 29%; 25% were admitted to the hospital, and 8.6% (51) survived to hospital discharge. The most prevalent etiologies were sudden infant death syndrome and trauma; these resulted in relatively higher mortality. Respiratory etiologies and submersions followed; these resulted in relatively lower mortality. Twenty-six percent of the arrests were witnessed by citizens, and an additional 8% were witnessed by rescue personnel. Witnessed arrests had a higher survival rate (16%). Thirty-one percent of patients received bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, which was not demonstrated to result in improved survival rates. Arrest rhythms were asystole (67%), pulseless electrical activity (24%), and ventricular fibrillation (9%); children with the latter 2 rhythms had better survival rates. One third of the survivors (16 of 51) had good neurologic outcome, none of whom received >3 doses of epinephrine or were resuscitated for >31 minutes in the emergency department. Conclusions. The 8.6% survival rate after out-of-hospital pediatric cardiopulmonary arrest is poor. Administration of >3 doses of epinephrine or prolonged resuscitation is futile.

No abstract

No abstract

This study compares the accuracy of a two-dimensional accelerometer worn on the ankle (a step activity monitor) with that of an electronic, digital pedometer worn on the belt line. Twenty-nine human subjects were evaluated while they briskly walked 400 M, slowly walked 10 M, and ascended and descended a flight of stairs. The step activity monitor had less error in all activities; its mean absolute error was 0.54%, whereas that of the pedometer was 2.82%. The difference was more pronounced in obese subjects (body mass index greater than 30), with an overall mean absolute error of 0.48% for the step activity monitor and 6.12% for the pedometer (nearly 13 times that of the step activity monitor). For subjects with a body mass index less than 30, the step activity monitor had an overall error of 0.56% and the pedometer had an overall error of 1.56% (less than 3 times that of the step activity monitor). The absolute error of the pedometer was positively correlated with body mass index (r = 0.792, p < 0.0001) and weight (r = 0.753, p < 0.0001), whereas the error of the step activity monitor was not significantly correlated with either. Neither device was significantly biased by age, gender, or the presence of a lower-extremity joint prosthesis. The accuracy and additional capabilities, including a real-time memory record of activity, of the step activity monitor make it well suited for objectively quantifying ambulatory activity, especially for obese subjects.

The weight of patients has not been demonstrated to have a consistent effect on the rate of polyethylene wear in clinical studies of total joint replacement. For this reason, we analyzed the relationship between quantitative activity, measured with a pedometer, and body mass index, a measure of obesity. Data were acquired for 209 individuals, 22-82 years of age; all were independent community walkers. One hundred and fifty-one had a well functioning total hip or knee replacement. Analysis of variance was used to evaluate the relationship between activity and body mass index, with adjustments for confounding variables. The 58 individuals with no total joint prosthesis averaged 7,781 steps per day, which was higher (p < 0.01) than those with a total hip (5,869 steps per day) or knee (4,597 steps per day) replacement. The subjects with no total joint prosthesis were, however, younger than the patients with a prosthesis (p < 0.01), and the body mass index of the patients with a total knee replacement was higher than that of the patients with a hip replacement and that of the subjects with no prosthesis (p < 0.01). After adjustment for differences in age, gender, and Charnley class, a higher body mass index (greater obesity) was associated with lower activity (p = 0.05). With regard to the rate of polyethylene wear, decreased ambulatory activity may counterbalance increased weight, which could, at least in part, explain why weight has not had a consistent effect on polyethylene wear in clinical studies. Wear is a function of use, not time. The effect of obesity on activity should be considered in radiographic studies of wear and other outcome assessments of total joint replacements.

Introduction:Paramedics often are asked to care for patients at the end of life. To do this, they must communicate effectively with family and caregivers, understand their legal obligations, and know when to withhold unwanted interventions. The objectives of this study were to ascertain paramedics' attitudes toward end-of-life (EOL) situations and the frequency with which they encounter them; and to compare paramedics' preparation during training for a variety of EOL care skills.Methods:A written survey was administered to a convenience sample of paramedics in two cities: Denver, Colorado and Los Angeles, California. Questions addressed: (1) attitudes toward EOL decision-making in prehospital settings; (2) experience (number of EOL situations experienced in the past two years); (3) importance of various EOL tasks in clinical practice (pronouncing and communicating death, ending resuscitation, honoring advance directives (ADs)); and (4) self-assessed preparation for these EOL tasks. For each task, importance and preparation were measured using a four-point Likert scale. Proportions were compared using McNemar chi-square statistics to identify areas of under or over-preparation.Results:Two hundred thirty-six paramedics completed the survey. The mean age was 39 years (range 22–59 years), and 222 (94%) were male. Twenty percent had >20 years of experience. Almost all participants (95%; 95% CI = 91–97%) agreed that prehospital providers should honor field ADs, and more than half (59%; 95% CI = 52–65%) felt that providers should honor verbal wishes to limit resuscitation at the scene. Ninety-eight percent of the participants (95% CI = 96–100%) had questioned whether specific life support interventions were appropriate for patients who appeared to have a terminal disease. Twenty-six percent (95% CI = 20–32%) reported to have used their own judgment during the past two years to withhold or end resuscitation in a patient who appeared to have a terminal disease. Significant discrepancies between the importance in practice and the level of preparation during training for the four EOL situations included: (1) understanding ADs (75% very important vs. 40% well prepared; difference 35%: 95% CI = 26–43%); (2) knowing when to honor written ADs (90% very important vs. 59% well-prepared; difference 31%: 95% CI = 23–38%); and (3) verbal ADs (75% very important vs. 54% well-prepared, difference 21%: 95% CI = 12–29%); and (4) communicating death to family or friends (79% very important vs. 48% well prepared, difference 31%: 95% CI = 23–39%). Paramedics' preparation in EOL skills was significantly lower than that for clinical skills such as endotracheal intubation or defibrillation.Conclusions:There is a need to include more training in EOL care into prehospital training curricula, including how to verify and apply ADs, when to withhold treatments, and how to discuss death with victims' family or friends.

Summary: This study compares the accuracy of a two-dimensional accelerometer worn on the ankle (a step activity monitor) with that of an electronic, digital pedometer worn on the belt line. Twcnty-nine human subjects were evaluated while they briskly walked 400 M, slowly walked 10 M. and ascended and dcsccndcd a flight 01 stairs. The step activity monitor had less error in all activities; its mean absolute error was 0.54%, whereas that of the pedometer was 2.82%. The difference was more pronounced in obese subjects (body mass index greater than 30), with an overall mean absolute error of 0.48% for the step activity monitor and 6.12% for the pedometer (ncal-ly 13 times that of the step activity monitor). For subjects with a body mass index less than 30, the step activity monitor had an overall error of 0.56% and the pedometer had an overall error of 1.56% (less than 3 times that of the step activity monitor). The absolute error of the pedometer was positively correlated with body mass index (r = 0.792, p < 0.0001) and weight (r = 0.753, p < 0.0001), whereas the error of the step activity monitor was not significantly correlated with either. Neither device was significantly biased by age, gcndcr, or the presence of a lower-extremity joint prosthesis. The accuracy and additional capabilities, including a real-time mcmory record of activity, of the step activity monitor make it well suited for objectively quantifying ambulatory activity, especially for obese subjects.Wear is the removal of material that occurs as a result of relative motion between load-bearing surfaces. in vivo polyethylene wear rates vary widely, but they have traditionally been measured with a denominator of time (S-8,lO-12,15.17,24,25,31.32). Wear is a function of use, not of time. In laboratory testing, wear rates are reported as a function of thc number of loading cycles (9,lO). A similar clinical measure of joint use that is convenient and reproducible would be valuable in assessing the use of a prosthetic joint.A variety of methods have been used to quantify activity, including questionnaires and activity rating scales (1,20.27,33), indirect calorimetry (4.21), heartrate monitoring (14,lfi). and several typcs of pedometers and accelerometers (2,4,14,(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(25)(26)(27)29). A pedometer has been used to quantify thc ambulatory activity of selected joint-replacement patients (25) and to analyze functional outcomes (3,26). Because the pedometer senses and records pelvic oscillations, certain movements of the lower extremity, which can cause wear of a prosthetic joint. may not be recorded. Furthermore, use of a pedometer is limited to subjects with relatively normal body habitus and gait. The pe-