This review encompasses the most important advances in liver functions and hepatotoxicity and analyzes which mechanisms can be studied in vitro. In a complex architecture of nested, zonated lobules, the liver consists of approximately 80 % hepatocytes and 20 % non-parenchymal cells, the latter being involved in a secondary phase that may dramatically aggravate the initial damage. Hepatotoxicity, as well as hepatic metabolism, is controlled by a set of nuclear receptors (including PXR, CAR, HNF-4α, FXR, LXR, SHP, VDR and PPAR) and signaling pathways. When isolating liver cells, some pathways are activated, e.g., the RAS/MEK/ERK pathway, whereas others are silenced (e.g. HNF-4α), resulting in up- and downregulation of hundreds of genes. An understanding of these changes is crucial for a correct interpretation of in vitro data. The possibilities and limitations of the most useful liver in vitro systems are summarized, including three-dimensional culture techniques, co-cultures with non-parenchymal cells, hepatospheres, precision cut liver slices and the isolated perfused liver. Also discussed is how closely hepatoma, stem cell and iPS cell–derived hepatocyte-like-cells resemble real hepatocytes. Finally, a summary is given of the state of the art of liver in vitro and mathematical modeling systems that are currently used in the pharmaceutical industry with an emphasis on drug metabolism, prediction of clearance, drug interaction, transporter studies and hepatotoxicity. One key message is that despite our enthusiasm for in vitro systems, we must never lose sight of the in vivo situation. Although hepatocytes have been isolated for decades, the hunt for relevant alternative systems has only just begun.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00204-013-1078-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

No abstract

No abstract

Macrolide-resistant mutants of Mycoplasma pneumoniae were selected in vitro from the susceptible reference strain M129, by 23 to 50 serial passages in subinhibitory concentrations of macrolides and related antibiotics, erythromycin A, azithromycin, josamycin, clindamycin, quinupristin, quinupristin-dalfopristin, pristinamycin, and telithromycin. Mutants for which the MICs are increased could be selected with all antibiotics except the streptogramin B quinupristin. Portions of genes encoding 23S rRNA (domains II and V) and ribosomal proteins L4 and L22 of mutants were amplified by PCR, and their nucleotide sequences were compared to those of the susceptible strain M129. No mutation could be detected in domain II of 23S rRNA. Two point mutations in domain V of 23S rRNA, C2611A and A2062G, were selected in the presence of erythromycin A, azithromycin, josamycin, quinupristin-dalfopristin, and telithromycin. Mutants selected in the presence of clindamycin and telithromycin harbored a single amino acid change (H70R or H70L, respectively) in ribosomal protein L4, whereas insertions of one, two, or three adjacent glycines at position 60 (M. pneumoniae numbering) were selected in the presence of both streptogramin combinations. Telithromycin was the sole antibiotic that selected for substitutions (P112R and A114T) and deletions ( 111 IPRA 114 ) in ribosomal protein L22. Three sequential mutational events in 23S rRNA and in both ribosomal proteins were required to categorize the strain as resistant to the ketolide. Azithromycin and erythromycin A were the only selector antibiotics that remained active (MICs, 0.06 and 1 g/ml, respectively) on their mutants selected after 50 passages.Mycoplasma pneumoniae is a common etiological agent of community-acquired respiratory tract infections in children and young adults. Macrolide and related antibiotics are the drugs of choice for the treatment of these infections, and strains with acquired resistance to macrolides have been rarely described. However, resistant strains of M. pneumoniae have been obtained in vitro, by selection in the presence of erythromycin A (20,22,27), and few macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae isolates have been reported from patients treated with these antibiotics (8,22,27).Macrolide, lincosamide, streptogramin, and ketolide antibiotics (MLSKs) inhibit protein synthesis by binding to domain V of 23S rRNA, and domain II is in the vicinity of this binding site (1,12,17,26). Three main mechanisms of resistance have been reported: drug inactivation, active efflux, and modification of the target sites by methylation or mutation (29, 34). Mutations in domains II and V of 23S rRNA and in ribosomal proteins L4 and L22 were involved in resistance to MLSKs, first in bacteria with a small number of rrn operons and more recently in bacteria like Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus with four and six rrn operons, respectively (25,29,32). In mycoplasmas, gram-positive related bacteria which possess one or two copies of 23S rRNA, only resistance by point muta...