we have identified that the human IgG2 subclass exists as an ensemble of distinct isoforms, designated IgG2-A, -B, and -A/B, which differ by the disulfide connectivity at the hinge region. In this report, we studied the structural and functional properties of the IgG2 disulfide isoforms and compared them to IgG1. Human monoclonal IgG1 and IgG2 antibodies were designed with identical antigen binding regions, specific to interleukin-1 cell surface receptor type 1. In vitro biological activity measurements showed an increased activity of the IgG1 relative to the IgG2 in blocking interleukin-1␤ ligand from binding to the receptor, suggesting that some of the IgG2 isoforms had lower activity. Under reduction-oxidation conditions, the IgG2 disulfide isoforms converted to IgG2-A when 1 M guanidine was used, whereas IgG2-B was enriched in the absence of guanidine. The relative potency of the antibodies in cell-based assays was: IgG1 > IgG2-A > IgG2 Ͼ Ͼ IgG2-B. This difference correlated with an increased hydrodynamic radius of IgG2-A relative to IgG2-B, as shown by biophysical characterization. The enrichment of disulfide isoforms and activity studies were extended to additional IgG2 monoclonal antibodies with various antigen targets. All IgG2 antibodies displayed the same disulfide conversion, but only a subset showed activity differences between IgG2-A and IgG2-B. Additionally, the distribution of isoforms was influenced by the light chain type, with IgG2 composed mostly of IgG2-A. Based on crystal structure analysis, we propose that IgG2 disulfide exchange is caused by the close proximity of several cysteine residues at the hinge and the reactivity of tandem cysteines within the hinge. Furthermore, the IgG2 isoforms were shown to interconvert in whole blood or a "bloodlike" environment, thereby suggesting that the in vivo activity of human IgG2 may be dependent on the distribution of isoforms.

This study examined whether the calcium-sensing receptor (CaR) is expressed in normal adult human osteoblastic and osteoclastic cells in culture, and whether the calcimimetic, cinacalcet HCl (AMG 073), potentiates the effects of calcium (via CaR, or some other receptor/mechanism). When mouse or human osteoblastic cells were treated with higher concentrations of calcium (6.6 or 8.6 mM in alpha-MEM/10% FBS) than present in control cultures (1.6 mM), the previously well-documented increase in cell number was demonstrated. Cinacalcet HCl affected cell proliferation of CHO cells transfected with CaR, dose dependently, but had no effect on human or mouse osteoblastic cell proliferation in calcium-containing medium (1.6 or 8.6 mM). To test cinacalcet HCl and calcium on osteoclastic cells, peripheral blood mononuclear cells were cultured in medium containing RANK ligand and M-CSF, supplemented with calcium, and/or cinacalcet HCl. Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-positive multinucleated osteoclastic cells on plastic or bone were then counted at 11 and 21 days, respectively. Calcium (greater than 6.0 mM) inhibited osteoclast formation, but cinacalcet HCl (30-1000 nM) had no effect on osteoclastic formation or resorption in the presence of calcium (1.6 or 6.1 mM). RT-PCR did not detect CaR in human, rat, or mouse primary osteoblastic cells and cell lines or osteoclastic cells. In conclusion, these studies indicate that the calcium-induced increase in osteoblastic cell number, and the decrease in formation/function of osteoclastic cells, involves a mechanism or receptor other than CaR. In addition, the calcimimetic agent did not potentiate the effects of calcium on normal adult human bone cells in vitro.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract