Oropharyngeal dysphagia is a highly prevalent comorbidity in neurological patients and presents a serious health threat, which may le to outcomes of aspiration pneumonia ranging from hospitalization to death. Therefore, an early identification of risk followed by an accurate diagnosis of oropharyngeal dysphagia is fundamental. This systematic review provides an update of currently available bedside screenings to identify oropharyngeal dysphagia in neurological patients. An electronic search was carried out in the databases PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and PsychInfo (formerly PsychLit), and all hits from 2008 up to December 2012 were included in the review. Only studies with sufficient methodological quality were considered, after which the psychometric characteristics of the screening tools were determined. Two relevant bedside screenings were identified, with a minimum sensitivity and specificity of ≥70 and ≥60 %, respectively.

The aim of the present study was to expand the scope of category norm and typicality data to include verbs for use when investigating semantic memory in fields such as linguistics, psychology, and aphasiology. Two experiments were conducted. In the first, participants were asked to list verbs within 10 semantic categories (e.g. breaking, cleaning, cooking, etc.) and 10 noun categories (e.g. animals, fruit, tools, etc.). In the second experiment, participants were asked to rate the typicality of verbs within 8 of the previously investigated verb categories. Although participants listed fewer verbs in verb categories than nouns in noun categories, the overall patterns with regard to correlation analyses between production frequency, mean rank of responses, lexical frequency, and typicality were consistent with those observed in noun categories. These patterns are also consistent with those observed in previous research. Potential similarities and differences between nouns and verbs, as well as future applications of such data, are discussed.

Background: COVID-19 led to the reconfiguration of U.K. orthopaedic trauma services because surgical capacity was threatened in acute centers. We report the 30-day mortality of proximal femoral fractures in older adults treated at an elective orthopaedic center. Methods: Patients >60 years old who presented with a proximal femoral fracture to any of 4 sites in the regional trauma network were transferred to our elective center for emergency surgery. Care was modeled according to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines, and efforts were made to treat all patients within 36 hours. Data were collected prospectively, and mortality outcomes were recorded. Results: Of the 192 patients who presented to the elective orthopaedic center, 167 were treated there. The median age of the latter patients was 88 years (interquartile range, 83 to 79 years). The median Charlson Comorbidity Index was 4 (interquartile range, 4 to 6). The median time from emergency department admission to surgical treatment was 24.5 hours (interquartile range, 18.8 to 34.7 hours). The 30-day rate of mortality was 10.2%. A total of 29 (17.4%) tested positive for COVID-19 during their admission, of whom 10 died, for a case-fatality rate of 34.5%. There were no significant differences in age (p = 0.33) or Charlson Comorbidity Index (p = 0.13) between patients who tested positive and those who did not. There was no significant difference in age between those who tested positive and died and those who tested positive and did not die (p = 0.13), but there was a significant difference in Charlson Comorbidity Index between those subgroups (p = 0.03). Conclusions: During a pandemic, an elective orthopaedic center can be reconfigured to a surgical center for older patients with proximal femoral fractures with acceptable health-care quality outcomes. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

No abstract