Neuropeptide Y1-36 (NPY1-36) acts through Y1 and Y2 receptors while the C-terminal NPY fragments NPY18-36 and N-acetyl[Leu28,31]pNPY24-36 act only through the Y2 receptor. We have investigated the effects of intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of NPY1-36, NPY18-36 and N-acetyl[Leu28,31]pNPY24-36 on LH secretion in the ovariectomised (OVX) ewe. These peptides were administered into a lateral ventricle (LV) or the third ventricle (3V) of OVX ewes during the non-breeding and breeding seasons. Microinjections of NPY were also made into the preoptic area (POA) during both seasons to investigate the effects of NPY at the level of the GnRH cell bodies. Tamed sheep were fitted with 19 gauge guide tubes into the LV, 3V or the septo-preoptic area (POA). Jugular venous blood samples were taken every 10 min for 3 h. Sheep were then given NPY1-36 (10 micrograms), NPY18-36 (100 micrograms) or saline vehicle into the LV; N-acetyl[Leu28,31]pNPY24-36 (100 micrograms), NPY1-36 (10 micrograms or 100 micrograms), NPY18-36 (10 micrograms or 100 micrograms) or saline vehicle into the 3V, or NPY1-36 (1 microgram, 5 micrograms, 10 micrograms) into the POA. Blood sampling continued for a further 3 h. LH was measured in plasma by radioimmunoassay. LV or 3V injection of 10 micrograms NPY1-36 caused a small but significant (P < 0.025) increase in the interval from the last pre-injection pulse of LH to the first post-injection LH pulse during the breeding season. Other LH pulse parameters were not significantly affected. NPY18-36 did not produce any significant change in LH pulsatility when injected into the LV, and neither peptide had any effect on plasma prolactin or GH levels. There was a significant (P < 0.01) reduction in LH pulse frequency after 3V injection of 10 micrograms and 100 micrograms NPY and 100 micrograms NPY18-36. Pulse amplitude was reduced by 3V administration of the Y2 agonist, N-acetyl[Leu28-31]pNPY24-36 and 100 micrograms NPY18-36. When the amplitude of the first post-injection LH pulse was analysed, 10 micrograms NPY also had a significant (P < 0.05) suppressive effect. During the non-breeding season, 100 micrograms NPY1-36 (but not 10 micrograms) decreased (P < 0.01) LH pulse frequency. LH pulse amplitude was significantly (P < 0.01) decreased by 100 micrograms NPY18-36. Doses of 10 micrograms NPY1-36 and 100 micrograms NPY18-36 had greater inhibitory effects on pulse frequency during the breeding season but the suppressive effect of 100 micrograms NPY was similar between seasons. Microinjections of NPY into the POA decreased (P < 0.01) average plasma LH levels during the non-breeding season at a dose of 10 micrograms but did not significantly affect pulse frequency or amplitude. We conclude that a substantial component of the inhibitory action of NPY on LH secretion in the absence of steroids is mediated by the Y2 receptor. This inhibition is probably exerted by way of a presynaptic action on GnRH terminals in the median eminence as NPY does not modulate the frequency or amplitude of LH pulses at the lev...

Homeostasis in the intact organism is achieved implicitly by repeated incremental feedback (inhibitory) and feedforward (stimulatory) adjustments enforced via intermittent signal exchange. In separated systems, neurohormone signals act deterministically on target cells via quantifiable effector-response functions. On the other hand, in vivo interglandular signaling dynamics have not been estimable to date. Indeed, experimentally isolating components of an interactive network definitionally disrupts time-sensitive linkages. We implement and validate analytical reconstruction of endogenous effectorresponse properties via a composite model comprising (i) a deterministic basic feedback and feedforward ensemble structure; (ii) judicious statistical allowance for possible stochastic variability in individual biologically interpretable dose-response properties; and (iii) the sole data requirement of serially observed concentrations of a paired signal (input) and response (output). Application of this analytical strategy to a prototypical neuroendocrine axis in the conscious uninjected horse, sheep, and human (i) illustrates probabilistic estimation of endogenous effector dose-response properties; and (ii) unmasks statistically vivid (2-to 5-fold) random fluctuations in inferred target-gland responsivity within any given pulse train. In conclusion, balanced mathematical formalism allows one to (i) reconstruct deterministic properties of interglandular signaling in the intact mammal and (ii) quantify apparent signal-response variability over short time scales in vivo. The present proof-of-principle experiments introduce a previously undescribed means to estimate time-evolving signal-response relationships without isotope infusion or pathway disruption.I n contradistinction to the remarkable insights gained recently about signaling behavior in isolated systems, virtually nothing is known about quantitative properties of unperturbed interglandular control in vivo. This knowledge deficit is significant, because homeostasis in the whole organism implicitly proceeds via repeated incremental dose-responsive adjustments transduced by the exchange of inhibitory and facilitative signals (1-8). Thematic examples include reciprocal coupling between anorexigenic and satiety factors that govern body weight, sympathetic neuronal and adrenalglandular linkages that parse adaptations to stress, and glucose and insulin interactions that ration the distribution of metabolic fuels (9-11). The burgeoning repertoire of novel molecular signals establishes a need for integrative formalism to estimate such in vivo effector-response dynamics (12). The present analytical platform offers a first step toward this end. MethodsOverview. Analysis of isolated components of an interlinked system has provided important insights. However, this approach disrupts intrinsic control of spontaneously unfolding adaptive signal control. The current studies illustrate an analytical strategy to reconstruct unmanipulated in vivo dose-response attributes.Stochastic E...

The distribution of progesterone receptors (PR) was mapped in the hypothalamus of the ewe using immunocytochemistry. These results were confirmed using in situ hybridization with a sheep-specific 35S-labelled riboprobe. In addition, the effect of oestrogen on the level of PR mRNA in the hypothalamus was examined in ovariectomized (OVX) ewes following treatment with an oestrogen implant or without treatment. PR immunoreactive (-ir) cells were readily detected in OVX animals. Labelled cells were observed in four main hypothalamic regions: the preoptic area (POA), including the organum vasculosum of the lamina terminalis, periventricular nucleus (PeVN), ventromedial nucleus (VMN) and the arcuate nucleus (ARC) (including the region ventral to the mamillary recess). In addition, lightly stained PR-ir cells were observed in the supraoptic nucleus and a few PR-ir cells were also found in the diagonal band of Broca. No PR-ir cells were found in the brainstem. PR mRNA-containing cells were found in the same hypothalamic regions as the PR-ir cells. Image analysis of emulsion-dipped slides following in situ hybridization indicated that oestrogen treatment increased (P<0.01) the mean number of silver grains/cell and the density of labelled cells in the VMN and ARC but had no effect on the level of PR mRNA expression in the POA or PeN. The distribution of PR-containing cells in the hypothalamus is similar to that described in other species and all cells were located in nuclei that contain large populations of oestrogen receptor-containing cells. These include regions implicated in the regulation of reproductive neuroendocrine function, and reproductive behaviour. Oestrogen and progesterone synergize to inhibit GnRH secretion and the present results suggest that these functions may involve cells of the VMN and ARC, with oestrogen acting to upregulate PR.