No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Background: Perioperative opioid consumption has received a great deal of recent attention. However, perioperative opioid utilization in the total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) population has not been well studied. We sought to identify factors associated with postoperative opioid use following TAA. Methods: The PearlDiver Research Program was used to query the Humana, Inc, administrative claims database from 2007 to 2017 for patients undergoing TAA. Additional variables of interest were identified using ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes. Preoperative opioid use was defined as having filled an opioid prescription in the 3 months before TAA. Prescription opioid claims data were tracked for 12 months postoperatively. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated and multivariate analysis was performed at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Results: A total of 544 patients who underwent TAA were identified, with 180 (33.1%) filling an opioid prescription preoperatively. Those filling prescriptions preoperatively had a significantly greater risk for postoperative opioid use compared to those not taking opioids (RR: 4.36 [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.80-6.80] at 12 months). Anxiety or depression (RR: 2.27 [1.44-3.59]), low back pain (LBP) (RR: 2.27 [1.50-3.42]), and fibromyalgia (RR: 2.15 [1.42-3.28]) were also found to increase the risk of taking opioids at 12 months postoperatively. Multivariate analysis found preoperative opioid use to be the strongest predictor of postoperative opioid use. Conclusions: Nearly one-third of patients filled an opioid prescription within 3 months of TAA, and filling a prescription preoperatively was the strongest factor associated with postoperative opioid use. Fibromyalgia, depression or anxiety, and LBP were also associated with an increased likelihood of postoperative opioid use. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Category: Ankle; Ankle Arthritis; Hindfoot; Other Introduction/Purpose: Total ankle replacement (TAR) has been shown as a viable surgical option to reduce pain, improve function, and preserve ankle joint range of motion in patients with Ankle osteoarthritis (AO). Standard anterior approach TAR capability in correcting deformities is already established by several studies. However, there is a paucity of literature evaluating patient outcomes as well as the potential to correct alignment using a lateral approach TAR. Therefore, the primary objective of this study was to assess the capability of lateral trans-fibular approach TAR in correcting coronal and sagittal plane deformity and secondarily to report the ability to improve patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following lateral TAR. Methods: This IRB-approved, retrospective comparative study included 14 consecutive patients that underwent lateral trans- fibular approach TAR for end-stage AO. Average age and BMI were 63.9 years (range 43-83) and 32.7 kg/m2 (SD 7.5). All patients had received pre- and post-operative weight-bearing CT imaging on the affected foot and ankle. Foot and Ankle Offset (FAO), Talar Tilt Angle (TTA), Hindfoot Moment Arm (HMA), and Lateral Talar Station (LTS) were performed. PROs were collected pre- and post-operatively at the latest clinical follow-up including: PROMIS Global Physical Health score, the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK), the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS) score, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) and the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) Daily Living Score. One-way ANOVA and Wilcoxon tests were used for comparison at each interval time period. A multivariate regression analysis was then performed to evaluate the association between change in alignment and improvements of PROs. Results: Three of 14 patients (21.4%) underwent a concomitant osseous re-alignment procedure. At an average of 16.1 months (range 11 to 24), all patients demonstrated a significant deformity correction in measurements performed: FAO (7.73% - 3.63%, p=0.031), HMA (10.93mm - 5.10mm, p=0.037), TTA (7.9o - 1.5o, p=0.003), and LTS (5.25mm - 2.83mm, p=0.018). Four of the PROs demonstrated significant improvement postoperatively: TSK (42.7-34.5, p=0.012), PROMIS Global Physical Health (46.1- 54.5, p=0.011), EFAS (5-10.3, p=0.004), and FAAM (60.5-79.7, p=0.04). PROMIS was associated (p=0.0015) with optimization of FAO (p=0.00065) and LTS (p=0.00436), R2 of 0.98). Improvements in TSK were associated with changes in the HMA (p=0.0074), R2 of 0.66. Improvements in FAAM correlated (p=0.048) with improvements in FAO (p=0.023) and TTA (p=0.029), and an R2 of 0.78. Conclusion: In this retrospective comparative cohort study, the results suggest that the lateral trans-fibular TAR can correct different aspects of AO deformity. Clinical benefit was also demonstrated by the impacted PROs, particularly TSK, PROMIS Global Physical Health, EFAS, and FAAM Daily Living. Direct and strong correlations between deformity correction measurements and the significantly improved PROs were found. The obtained data might help surgeons when planning treatment and may serve as the basis for future comparative prospective studies.

Category: Midfoot/Forefoot; Basic Sciences/Biologics; Hindfoot Introduction/Purpose: A recent study published in Nature (Venkadesan et al.) demonstrated that coupling the transverse arch (TA) with the medial longitudinal arch (MLA) significantly increased midfoot intrinsic stiffness. The contribution of the TA is substantial, suggested as the evolutionary advancement providing the foot stiffness required for human bipedalism. Progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) is a complex deformity ultimately resulting in loss of stiffness and collapse of the MLA. The novel understanding of the TA may play a key role in the pathogenesis of this deformity. The objectives of this study were to assess and compare the TA curvature in PCFD and controls and to evaluate its relationship with accepted PCFD measures. We hypothesized that the curvature of the TA will be decreased in PCFD. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted for 32 PCFD and 32 controls. Measurements were performed using weight- bearing CT (WBCT). A novel measurement, the transverse arch plantar (TAP) angle, was designed to directly measure the TA in both PCFD (Figure 1a) and controls (Figure 1b). TA curvature was calculated using the equation described by Venkadesan et al. (Figure 6) utilizing width, length (Figure 3a), 3rd metatarsal thickness (Figure 3b), and 4th metatarsal torsion (Figure 4a, 4b). Finally, uni- and multivariate analyses were performed to analyze the relationship between the TAP angle, Foot and Ankle Offset (FAO), peritalar subluxation, and measurements associated with PCFD classes: hindfoot moment arm (class A), talonavicular coverage angle (class B), Meary angle (class C), medial facet uncoverage angle (class D), and talar tilt (class E). Normality of different variables was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Two groups were compared using t-test for normal, and Mann-Whitney for non-normal variables. Results: Measurements of the TAP angle were found to be significantly higher in the PCFD group than the control group with a mean angle of 115.24° (SD 10.68) and 100.76° (SD 7.92) respectively (p<0.001) (Figure 2).No significant difference was found in the calculated TA curvature between PCFD and controls with mean values of 17.84 (SD 4.41) and 18.18 (SD 3.68) respectively (p=0.741) (Figure 5).The univariate analysis performed showed a moderate positive correlation between the TAP angle and the FAO (ρ=0.58;r2=0.34;p <0.001).The multivariate analyses showed, among the different PCFD class measurements and the TAP angle, only the middle facet uncoverage (β=0.08,p<0.001) and hindfoot moment arm (β=0.32, p<0.001) were associated with higher values of FAO, while only the Meary (β=0.49,p=0.004) and the talonavicular coverage angles were associated with higher values of peritalar subluxation (β=0.75,p<0.001). Whereas, Meary's angle was the only predictive factor of higher TA collapse (β=0.55,p<0.001). Conclusion: Our direct measurement showed a collapsed of the TA in PCFD. However, this did not appear to be a consequence of insufficient bone torsion, but rather some other etiology, possibly a soft tissue failure. Considering the implication of the TA among the different PCFD classes, it did not appear to play a significant role on the overall PCFD deformity. TA collapse seemed mainly influenced by Meary's angle, which assess the MLA. This further supports the idea behind TA and MLA coupling suggesting that when the TA is collapsed, the foot does not possess the required stiffness to maintain the MLA.