BackgroundRandomised controlled trials (RCTs) are essential for evidence-based medicine and increasingly rely on front-line clinicians to recruit eligible patients. Clinicians’ difficulties with negotiating equipoise is assumed to undermine recruitment, although these issues have not yet been empirically investigated in the context of observable events. We aimed to investigate how clinicians conveyed equipoise during RCT recruitment appointments across six RCTs, with a view to (i) identifying practices that supported or hindered equipoise communication and (ii) exploring how clinicians’ reported intentions compared with their actual practices.Methods and FindingsSix pragmatic UK-based RCTs were purposefully selected to include several clinical specialties (e.g., oncology, surgery) and types of treatment comparison. The RCTs were all based in secondary-care hospitals (n = 16) around the UK. Clinicians recruiting to the RCTs were interviewed (n = 23) to understand their individual sense of equipoise about the RCT treatments and their intentions for communicating equipoise to patients. Appointments in which these clinicians presented the RCT to trial-eligible patients were audio-recorded (n = 105). The appointments were analysed using thematic and content analysis approaches to identify practices that supported or challenged equipoise communication. A sample of appointments was independently coded by three researchers to optimise reliability in reported findings. Clinicians and patients provided full written consent to be interviewed and have appointments audio-recorded.Interviews revealed that clinicians’ sense of equipoise varied: although all were uncertain about which trial treatment was optimal, they expressed different levels of uncertainty, ranging from complete ambivalence to clear beliefs that one treatment was superior. Irrespective of their personal views, all clinicians intended to set their personal biases aside to convey trial treatments neutrally to patients (in accordance with existing evidence). However, equipoise was omitted or compromised in 48/105 (46%) of the recorded appointments. Three commonly recurring practices compromised equipoise communication across the RCTs, irrespective of clinical context. First, equipoise was overridden by clinicians offering treatment recommendations when patients appeared unsure how to proceed or when they asked for the clinician’s expert advice. Second, clinicians contradicted equipoise by presenting imbalanced descriptions of trial treatments that conflicted with scientific information stated in the RCT protocols. Third, equipoise was undermined by clinicians disclosing their personal opinions or predictions about trial outcomes, based on their intuition and experience. These broad practices were particularly demonstrated by clinicians who had indicated in interviews that they held less balanced views about trial treatments. A limitation of the study was that clinicians volunteering to take part in the research might have had a particular interest in improving t...
writing committee for the IVAN Study Group Purpose: To report on the development and progression of macular atrophy (MA) and its relationship with morphologic and functional measures in study and fellow eyes in the Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in Age-related Choroidal Neovascularisation trial. Design: Reading center analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial. Participants: Participants with previously untreated neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in the study eye. Methods: Color, fluorescein angiography (FA) and OCT images acquired at baseline and during the 2-year follow-up were graded systematically for presence of MA. Regression models were constructed to explore relationships between MA and lesion morphology and vision measures (best-corrected distance and near acuity, reading speed and index, contrast sensitivity). Main Outcome Measures: Primary outcome was development of intralesional MA (175 mm greatest linear dimension of choroidal vessels seen on FA and/or color, aided by OCT) lying within the maximum footprint of the neovascular lesion. Results: Study eye data were available for 594 of 610 participants; 57 (9.6%) showed intralesional MA at baseline. Incident intralesional MA occurred in 24.4% by the final visit and extralesional MA in only 1.54%. In fellow eyes, an established nAMD lesion was present at baseline in 248 of whom 42 (16.9%) showed intralesional MA at baseline and 32 (12.9%) developed incident intralesional MA. The odds of incident intralesional MA by final visit were lower in study eyes that had 50% classic CNV at baseline (odds ratio [OR], 0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19e0.80; P ¼ 0.010), subretinal fluid at final visit (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.25e0.76; P ¼ 0.004), or pigment epithelial detachment at final visit (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.21e0.74; P ¼ 0.004). Secondary analyses of incident or progressed intralesional MA in study eyes supported these findings, with odds increasing if the fellow eye had baseline intralesional MA (OR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.09e5.44; P ¼ 0.030). No significant associations were observed between development of intralesional MA and any other morphologic or visual function measure. Conclusions: Macular atrophy frequently develops within an nAMD lesion in eyes receiving antieVEGF therapy over 2 years. No associations between incident MA and drug or treatment frequency or visual function were detected, providing some reassurance to clinicians; however, the longer-term effects remain unknown.
Context Patients with critical illness are thought to be at risk of adrenal insufficiency. There are no models of dynamic hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis function in this group of patients and thus current methods of diagnosis are based on aggregated, static models. Objective To characterize the secretory dynamics of the HPA axis in the critically ill (CI) after cardiac surgery. Design Mathematical modeling of cohorts. Setting Cardiac critical care unit. Patients 20 male patients CI at least 48 hours after cardiac surgery and 19 healthy (H) male volunteers. Interventions None. Main Outcome Measures Measures of hormone secretory dynamics were generated from serum adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) sampled every hour and total cortisol every 10 min for 24 h. Results All CI patients had pulsatile ACTH and cortisol profiles. CI patients had similar ACTH secretion (1036.4 [737.6] pg/mL/24 h) compared to the H volunteers (1502.3 [1152.2] pg/mL/24 h; P = .20), but increased cortisol secretion (CI: 14 447.0 [5709.3] vs H: 5915.5 [1686.7)] nmol/L/24 h; P < .0001). This increase in cortisol was due to nonpulsatile (CI: 9253.4 [3348.8] vs H: 960 [589.0] nmol/L/24 h, P < .0001), rather than pulsatile cortisol secretion (CI: 5193.1 [3018.5] vs H: 4955.1 [1753.6] nmol/L/24 h; P = .43). Seven (35%) of the 20 CI patients had cortisol pulse nadirs below the current international guideline threshold for critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency, but an overall secretion that would not be considered deficient. Conclusions This study supports the premise that current tests of HPA axis function are unhelpful in the diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency in the CI. The reduced ACTH and increase in nonpulsatile cortisol secretion imply that the secretion of cortisol is driven by factors outside the HPA axis in critical illness.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.