Introduction:
We aimed to describe utilization and indication(s) for long-term central venous catheters (CVCs) in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and identify potential strategies to decrease CVC utilization.
Methods:
We conducted a single-center prospective quality improvement initiative at a 30-bed PICU in a large, freestanding, academic children’s hospital. We created an electronic report to identify patients with an indwelling CVC for 7 days and older (defined as long term). We discussed the ongoing need for each long-term CVC with PICU clinicians at weekly interdisciplinary structured “CVC stewardship rounds.” We then made recommendations around expedited removal of CVCs. We conducted multiple Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles to categorize CVC indications, identify modifiable factors, and educate PICU clinicians. We hypothesized that CVC stewardship rounds would decrease long-term CVC utilization in our PICU.
Results:
From October 2016 to September 2017, 607 long-term CVCs were eligible for the stewardship intervention. Compared to the preintervention period, we recorded a significant increase in peripherally inserted central catheters and a decrease in nontunneled CVCs (
P
< 0.001). Most patients had single- or double-lumen CVCs in both the preintervention and intervention periods (86% and 91%, respectively). The utilization of overall long-term CVC devices, and those with modifiable indications, decreased during the intervention period.
Conclusions:
A single-center QI intervention focused on PICU CVC stewardship was associated with a decrease in CVC utilization.
Introduction:
Suboptimal hand hygiene (HH) remains a significant modifiable cause of healthcare-associated infections in the intensive care unit. We report a single-center, quality improvement project aimed at improving adherence to optimal HH among physicians, nurse practitioners, and nursing staff, and to sustain any improvement over time.
Methods:
A key driver diagram was developed to identify 5 primary drivers of change: leadership support, education initiatives, patient-family engagement, increased audit frequency, and individual feedback to promote accountability. We examined HH compliance over 3 years in 3 phases (pre-intervention, intervention, and post-intervention). The intervention period involved a multimodal approach designed to influence unit culture as well as individual HH practice. HH screens were installed outside the patient rooms to provide just-in-time reminders and display of regularly updated HH adherence data for provider groups.
Results:
We recorded 6,563 HH opportunities, providers included nurses (66%), attendings (12%), fellow/resident (16%), and nurse practitioners (NP) (6%). All clinical groups demonstrated HH compliance >90% during the post-intervention period. The improvements in practice were sustained for a year after the intervention.
Conclusion:
Our report highlights modifiable factors that impact HH and may inform quality improvement interventions aimed at improving HH compliance at other centers.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.