With the advancements in modern science and technology, Intellectual Property Rights came in to existence to benefit and encourage innovative people for their work. The term intellectual property rights gained his strength from a long time and much expanded since then. These rights are applied to all innovation irrespective of educational qualifications and implies to all subjects. Dentistry in recent years has also developed interest in the field of intellectual property rights (IPR) and Patents due to extensive research in the fraternity. Therefore, it is need of the hour to check out the awareness about intellectual property rights. If people would aware about IPR, then only can proceed for IPRs in future for their research findings. As the universities are the main hub of intellectuals therefore, aim of the present study was to determine the intellectual property rights (IPR) awareness level among the dental scholars of SGT University, Gurugram. Hence, this would be an advantage for dental researchers to explore and expand their scope of activities.
Aim:To evaluate and compare the efficacy of pre-procedural mouth rinses in reducing microbial content of aerosol product during ultrasonic-scaling procedures by viable bacterial count.Materials And Methods:5 patients were assigned in each group: A- Neem, B -CHX, C-Triphala, D - Control Group.In Group A, B, C -Patient were asked to rinse their mouth with 10 ml mouthwash for 30 seconds before SRP, of which A and C are self- prepared herbal mouthwashes i.e Triphala and Neem. Aerosol will be collected, cultured and incubated on blood agar plates at specified sites from operator. CFU will be counted and result will be assessed statistically. Conclusion: The study suggests that 10 ml of Neem Mouth rinse when used 10 minutes prior to ultrasonic scaling is more potent in reducing the aerosol contamination as compared to the Triphala mouth rinse and commercially available 0.2 % Chlorhexidine mouthrinse. Also the reduction in aerosol content was seen in Tray location when rinsed with CHX and aerosol reduction in Spitoon and Chest location while rinsing with Neem mouthrinse.
The success of dental implant depends on its integration with the surrounding tissue and this is influenced by various factors, like implant material, amount of bone and its quality and the implant loading condition. The peri-implant tissue is comprised of the soft (mucosa) and hard (bone) tissues. Absolute contact between the peri-implant bone and the implant surface is another factor essential for the success of any implant system. The direct structural and functional connection between ordered living bone and the surface of a load-carrying implant is defined as ''Osseointegration''. The bone undergoes remodelling so as to maintain bone strength and mineral homeostasis. The preservation of biological seal, the anatomy and quality of bone where implant needs to be positioned, implant macrostructure are some of the factors that dictate the integration of the implant to the hard tissue. In addition, the gingival morphology also plays an important role in determining the final aesthetic outcome. Gingival morphology is described in terms of gingival phenotype or gingival biotype. ‘‘Gingival phenotype’’ is a term that addresses to the variations in the thickness and width of the keratinized tissuewhereas ''Gingival biotype'' depicts the thickness of the gingiva in the facio-palatal / faciolingual dimension.Inadequate gingival thickness is a major reason for periodontal attachment loss and marginal tissue recession in a patient, directly contributing to the periodontal disease progression. The peri-implant soft tissue consists of a junctional epithelium (JE) and the connective tissue but owing to the biologic differences between the peri-implant and periodontal tissues, the periimplant tissues are more vulnerable to mucosal inflammation and bone loss. The health of the peri–implant tissues play an important role in the long-term outcome of dental implants. The preservation and reconstruction of soft tissue around dental implants is an important aspect of dental implantology. Restoring the function, aesthetics and harmony of dentition is the primary intention of implantology. This is achieved with a sound crestal bone stability and healthy peri-implant soft tissue. Other factors like abutment material and its connection to the implant, the neck design also affects the peri-implant soft tissue integrity. This review discusses the various factors that directly and indirectly influence the aesthetic outcomes following a dental implant placement. KEY WORDS Aesthetics, Peri-Implant Tissue, Osseointegration, Platform Switching
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.