Error-prone and error-free DNA damage repair responses that are induced in most bacteria after exposure to various chemicals, antibiotics or radiation sources were surveyed across the genus Acinetobacter. The error-prone SOS mutagenesis response occurs when DNA damage induces a cell's umuDC-or dinP-encoded error-prone polymerases. The model strain Acinetobacter baylyi ADP1 possesses an unusual, regulatory umuD allele (umuDAb) with an extended 59 region and only incomplete fragments of umuC. Diverse Acinetobacter species were investigated for the presence of umuDC and their ability to conduct UV-induced mutagenesis. Unlike ADP1, most Acinetobacter strains possessed multiple umuDC loci containing either umuDAb or a umuD allele resembling that of Escherichia coli. The nearly omnipresent umuDAb allele was the ancestral umuD in Acinetobacter, with horizontal gene transfer accounting for over half of the umuDC operons. Despite multiple umuD(Ab)C operons in many strains, only three species conducted UV-induced mutagenesis: Acinetobacter baumannii, Acinetobacter ursingii and Acinetobacter beijerinckii. The type of umuDC locus or mutagenesis phenotype a strain possessed was not correlated with its error-free response of survival after UV exposure, but similar diversity was apparent. The survival of 30 Acinetobacter strains after UV treatment ranged over five orders of magnitude, with the Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-A. baumannii (Acb) complex and haemolytic strains having lower survival than non-Acb or non-haemolytic strains. These observations demonstrate that a genus can possess a range of DNA damage response mechanisms, and suggest that DNA damage-induced mutation could be an important part of the evolution of the emerging pathogens A. baumannii and A. ursingii. INTRODUCTIONWhen bacteria are exposed to DNA-damaging agents, such as UV light or chemical mutagens, a wide variety of SOS response genes (genes that play critical roles in repairing damaged DNA) are specifically induced (Friedberg et al., 1995;Walker, 1996). In the model developed by experimentation in Escherichia coli, SOS genes are negatively regulated by the LexA repressor binding to the SOS box in the promoter (Mount et al., 1972). DNA damage causes the activation of RecA, which facilitates LexA self-cleavage and releases the repression of SOS genes such as umuDC (Little et al., 1980;1981). UmuD initially causes a pause in cell division while DNA repair and replication occurs (Opperman et al., 1999). However, within minutes, UmuD homodimerizes and carries out intermolecular self-cleavage, facilitated by activated RecA* interaction (Nohmi et al., 1988). Two cleaved UmuD9 molecules then associate with UmuC to form DNA polymerase V, which carries out error-prone, trans-lesion DNA replication (SOS mutagenesis) (Reuven et al., 1999;Tang et al., 1999). Another errorprone polymerase commonly involved in SOS mutagenesis as part of the DNA damage response is DinP (also called DinB), DNA polymerase IV, which can function either by itself (Kim et al., 1997) or with U...