The SCORTEN score is effective in predicting the outcome in Taiwanese TEN patients. A number of factors are predictors of mortality. In our study, we determine renal insufficiency and failure to be a marker for predicting a poor outcome.
Introduction Rupture of the extensor pollicis longus (EPL) tendon has been reported in the setting of distal radius fracture, chronic inflammatory arthritis, following steroid injection, and with excessive or repetitive activities. Truly, spontaneous EPL rupture, without an identifiable predisposing factor, has rarely been reported. Methods We present a retrospective case series of eight patients with spontaneous EPL rupture who were treated in our institution. Results The majority of the cases were female (75 %, n=6), and the nondominant (75 %, n=6) hand was most commonly involved. No identifiable predisposing factor could be identified in four patients. While four patients reported a history of a fall, radiographs failed to demonstrate skeletal abnormality in all four cases. No additional pathology could be identified at the time of surgery. Patients were treated using tendon transfer (n=7) or interpositional graft (n=1). There has been no case of clinical recurrence in the mean of 74.8 months (range 23-140 months) follow-up period.
ConclusionThe EPL tendon is at risk for spontaneous rupture even in the absence of identifiable predisposing risk factor. Rather than pure mechanical irritation, vascular and metabolic factors may also play a substantial role in the etiology of this uncommon diagnosis.
Background:
Surgical strategy to treat incomplete brachial plexus injury with palsies of the shoulder and elbow by using proximal nerve graft/transfer or distal nerve transfer is still debated. The aim of this study was to compare both strategies with respect to the recovery of elbow flexion.
Methods:
One hundred forty-seven patients were enrolled: 76 patients underwent reconstruction using proximal nerve graft/transfer, and 71 patients underwent reconstruction using distal nerve transfer. All patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively to assess the recovery rate and muscle strength of elbow flexion. Shoulder abduction and hand grip power were also recorded to assess any concomitant postoperative changes between the two methods.
Results:
The best recovery rate for functional elbow flexion (p = 0.006) and the fastest recovery to M3 strength (p < 0.001) were found in the double fascicular transfer group. However, recovery of shoulder abduction with proximal nerve graft/transfer was significantly better than with distal nerve transfer (80.3 percent versus 66.2 percent in shoulder abduction ≥60 degrees; and 56.6 percent versus 38.0 percent in shoulder abduction ≥90 degrees). A significant decrease in grip strength between the operative and nonoperative hands was also found in patients undergoing distal nerve transfer (p = 0.001).
Conclusions:
Proximal nerve graft/transfer offers more accurate diagnosis and proper treatment to restore shoulder and elbow function simultaneously. Distal nerve transfer can offer more efficient elbow flexion. Combined, both strategies in primary nerve reconstruction are especially recommended when there is no healthy or not enough donor nerve available.
CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:
Therapeutic, III.
Mutations in the MID1 gene result in X-linked Opitz G/BBB syndrome (OS), a disorder that affects development of midline structures and comprises hypertelorism, cleft lip/palate, hypospadias, and laryngo-tracheo-esophageal abnormalities, and, at times, neurological, anal, and cardiac defects. MID1 gene abnormalities include missense, nonsense, and splicing mutations, small insertions, small deletions, and complex rearrangements. Here, we present a patient with Opitz G/BBB syndrome and a unique MID1 gene point mutation c.1703T
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.