Background: Hysteroscopy is a traditional diagnostic method, whereas vaginoscopy is a more recent but proven approach. However, most physicians are unfamiliar with vaginoscopy. We aimed to compare the feasibility and tolerability between the two techniques to increase clinical awareness. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 100 patients who underwent office hysteroscopy with either the standard approach or the vaginoscopic approach between May and July 2019. While the standard hysteroscopy group underwent speculum insertion and the cervix was grasped with forceps, the vaginoscopy group did not. The primary outcome was a successfully completed examination. Related outcomes were the pain score, complications, and absence of signs of infection at 1 week after completing the examination. Results: The success rates of vaginoscopy and standard hysteroscopy were comparable (95.5% vs 96.3%). The median time to complete a vaginoscopy (135 seconds) was significantly shorter than to complete a standard hysteroscopy (190 seconds, p = 0.02). The median pain score was 3 for vaginoscopy, which was significantly lower than that for standard hysteroscopy (5; p = 0.01). There were no differences in the surgical complication rate between vaginoscopy (n = 4) and standard hysteroscopy (n = 3) (relative risk = 0.81, 95% confidence interval = 0.11-6.00). Conclusion: Vaginoscopy required a shorter time for the completion of the examination and involved lesser pain than the standard hysteroscopy. The success rates were comparable between the two techniques. Therefore, vaginoscopy is a good option for office hysteroscopic examinations.

The objective of this study was to conduct a 2-year follow-up of individuals having unsatisfactory reports of Pap smears and to analyze the contributing factors. This was a retrospective study at a medical center that performed about 5000–6000 Pap smears annually in Eastern Taiwan. Women who had unsatisfactory results due to scant cellularity between January 1, 2015–December 31, 2016, were included in this study. The control group comprised age-matched women with normal Pap smears at a 1:4 ratio, during the same period. The clinical characteristics and the 2-year outcomes were followed. Patients who were unavailable for follow-up assessments or who had insufficient clinical information were excluded. Student’s t-test and chi-square test were used for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Statistical significance was defined as a p-value < 0.05. A total of 887 Pap smears were included. A total of 717 and 170 women had normal Pap and unsatisfactory Pap tests, respectively. After excluding women who were unavailable for follow-up, the final analysis included 248 and 67 women with normal and unsatisfactory Pap tests, respectively. The mean age was not significantly different between the two groups (49.97 ± 10.69 and 51.61 ± 11.28 years in the unsatisfactory Pap and control groups, respectively [p > 0.05]). The percentage of menopause and vaginal discharge were significantly different between the two groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that premenopausal status, increased discharge were associated with the risk of unsatisfactory Pap tests. Of the 67 women with unsatisfactory Pap tests, all tested negative for any malignancies at a 2-year follow-up assessment. Women with increased vaginal discharge and without menopause were at an increased risk of having an unsatisfactory Pap test. Our results indicate that an unsatisfactory Pap smear due to scant cellularity might not increase the risk of intraepithelial neoplasia or cancer after 2 years. Further, large-scale studies with longer follow-up periods are required.

Rationale: Ovarian cystadenofibroma is a relatively rare benign ovarian tumor. Ovarian remnant syndrome (ORS) is a rare complication of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO). We report a rare case of ORS with paraintestinal ovarian serous cystadenofibroma that developed 30 years after total abdominal hysterectomy and BSO in a 73-year-old woman.Patient concerns: A 73-year-old woman complained of long-term lower abdominal discomfort.Diagnosis: She was diagnosed with a cystic lesion in the lower abdomen on transabdominal ultrasonography. Further diagnostic imaging and laboratory tests could not exclude a diagnosis of malignancy. Interventions:The patient underwent laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. We found one cystic lesion 5 cm in size with multiple septa that was adhered to the small bowel. We consulted a general surgeon for tumor resection. Dissection was performed and the specimen was then removed from the umbilical wound.Outcomes: Histopathological examination revealed an ovarian serous cystadenofibroma. The postoperative recovery was uneventful.Lessons: Patients with lower abdominal pain after a previous hysterectomy and BSO should be examined with transabdominal sonography for ORS.