Background Quality of life and functional improvement have emerged as important goals for patients with oncologic disease. For patients with head and neck cancer, free anterolateral thigh (ALT) flaps serve as reliable reconstruction and provide functional restoration. Nevertheless, factors affecting the resumption of oral feeding are rarely described. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the functional outcomes of oral feeding for patients with different oncologic defect patterns and reconstructive ALT flap designs. Methods We retrospectively reviewed patients with head and neck cancer undergoing oncologic ablation and free ALT reconstruction between January 2016 and April 2018 at National Taiwan University Hospital. Patients were categorized into 2 groups as through-and-through (T&T) and non–through-and-through (non-T&T) according to the defect pattern. We further subgrouped T&T patients into lip resection/lip sparing according to lip involvement. Reconstructive ALT flaps were of 2 designs, folded (F-ALT) and chimeric (C-ALT). Outcomes of oral feeding were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and differences between groups were compared using the Student t test. Results We identified 233 patients who received oncologic ablation and free ALT flap reconstruction. There was no significant difference in functional recovery between the T&T and non-T&T groups (81.2% vs 73%, P = 0.137). However, among patients who succeeded in resuming oral feeding, lip-sparing patients had better functional recovery in terms of early oral feeding within 6 months and nasogastric tube removal compared with lip-resection patients (100% vs 83.3%, P = 0.001). Moreover, the F-ALT design resulted in a higher success rate in resuming oral feeding compared with the C-ALT design (90.5% vs 54.6%, P = 0.032). Conclusions Patients with head and neck cancer with T&T defects were associated with higher rates of secondary flap revision and a trend of delayed oral feeding. In the long term, improved oral feeding outcome with the F-ALT design was observed compared with the C-ALT design in the specific group with T&T defect.
IntroductionAxillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for breast cancer has been considered to be associated with a variety of complications, such as excessive postoperative wound drainage, prolonged drain placement, or seroma formation in the short term, or arm lymphedema in the long run. Immediate lymphedema reconstruction (ILR) has been proposed to reduce the occurrence of arm lymphedema by anastomosing the transected arm lymphatics to nearby branches of the axillary vein immediately after ALND. This study aims to demonstrate that ILR can also reduce the postoperative drainage amount.Patients and MethodsBetween April 2020 and January 2022, a total of 76 breast cancer patients receiving ALND were reviewed. Forty four of them also received ILR immediately after ALND. The assignment of ILR surgery was non‐random, based on patients' willingness and plastic surgeons' availability. The lymphatic vessels in the axillary wound were anastomosed with nearby terminal branches of the axillary vein under surgical microscope. Patients' characteristics, including age, body mass index (BMI), neoadjuvant therapy, type of breast surgery, the occurrence of seroma formation, number of removed lymph nodes, number of positive nodes, and the drainage amount from the operative wounds were compared between ILR and non‐ILR groups.ResultsNo statistically significant difference was noted between groups in terms of age (56.5 ± 9.8 vs. 60.9 ± 10.7, p = .09), BMI (22.6 ± 3.7 vs. 23.7 ± 3.8, p = .27), type of breast surgery (p = .32), the occurrence of seroma formation (p = 1.0), the likelihood of receiving neoadjuvant therapy (p = .12), number of lymph nodes removed (17.5 ± 7.6 vs. 17.4 ± 8.3, p = .96), or number of positive nodes on final pathology (3.7 ± 5.4 vs. 4.8 ± 8.5, p = .53) except the ILR group had statistically significantly less drainage amount than non‐ILR group (39.3 ± 2.6 vs. 48.3 ± 3.7, p = .046).ConclusionFor breast cancer patients receiving ALND, the immediate lymphatic reconstruction can reduce the postoperative drainage amount from the operative wound.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.