The transition from traditional face-to-face to online teaching during the Covid-19 pandemic happened so rapidly that most teachers started teaching without enough training, preparation, and knowledge of online teaching. In order to better understand this current teaching paradigm, the present research examined how English teachers perceive their own ability to teach online. It investigated English teachers’ self-efficacy to teach online by surveying 138 EFL university teachers in Japan. A survey with 29 Likert-scale and two open-ended questions was developed to examine four latent constructs of online English teaching self-efficacy: technology, pedagogy, communicative language teaching, and self-management. Results of the survey found that English teachers were highly self-efficacious toward teaching online. They were most self-efficacious toward the usage of technology, followed by pedagogy, communicative language teaching (CLT), and least efficacious toward self-management when teaching online. Teachers had high self-efficacy for using different online platforms, organizing group work activities, and conducting formative assessments for evaluation. On the other hand, teachers had lowest self-efficacy for maintaining the balance between research and teaching activities. This paper concludes with some pedagogical implications for English teachers when teaching online.
This study explored two assessment approaches to oral performances: analytical complexity, accuracy, and fluency (CAF) indices and human raters’ evaluations. CAF indices are frequently used in second-language speaking (L2) research; however, because tasks are communicative and goal-oriented, the degree to which students achieve such communicative goals must also be included. By incorporating human ratings of monologue organization and perceived CAF into speaking assessments, researchers can better understand the relationship between the analytical CAF indices and human ratings of a monologue task. The participants consisted of 48 English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students in a Japanese university. Their oral performances of 2-min opinion-based monologues were audio-recorded and then transcribed and analyzed using CAF measures. In addition, 11 human raters evaluated the same recordings in terms of the following criteria: topic organization, complexity, accuracy, and fluency. These ratings were then analyzed using the many-facet Rasch measurement (MFRM). Multiple linear regression results showed that fluency accounted for a significant amount of the human ratings, but other measures (lexis, complexity, accuracy) explained only a small portion of the variance. This study concluded with implications regarding L2 testing in speaking assessments.
The purpose of this study was to examine to what extent additional interventions to the 3/2/1 task help EFL learners develop speaking fluency. Participants were 48 university students in Japan. The 3/2/1 task was implemented 11 times in one 15-week academic semester. The participants were divided into three groups including 1) comparison group, 2) input enhancement group, and 3) input + peer-check group. Speaking data were recorded in weeks 2 and 14, transcribed, and analyzed based on five fluency measures. The pre-/post-recording data showed significant gains in mean length of runs in both experimental groups and in phonation time ratio in the input + peer-check group. Further analyses indicated that the increase in the mean length of runs is associated with the frequency of target formulaic language usage. The implications of fluency promoting instructions in EFL classrooms are discussed.
The 2020 Covid-19 pandemic changed the delivery of many classes from face-to-face to online. This study was an attempt to investigate online English teaching self-efficacy by surveying 138 university English teachers in Japan during the pandemic. A survey with 30 Likert-scale items was developed to examine four latent constructs of online teaching self-efficacy: pedagogy, technology, communicative language teaching (CLT), and self-management. In addition, how these constructs correlated with each other as well as the relative contribution of the participants’ background variables and questionnaire subscales to overall self-efficacy were examined. Results showed that teachers were highly self-efficacious about teaching online especially with the integration of technology but were not self-efficacious to manage themselves online especially with time usage. In addition, multiple linear regression analysis showed that the four constructs predicted the participants’ overall self-efficacy, but their background variables did not impact their overall self-efficacy to teach online. 2020年Covid-19パンデミックで多くの授業が対面からオンラインに切り替わった。本研究では、日本の138名の大学英語教員へのアンケート調査によるオンライン授業に対する自己効力感を調査した。30項目のリッカート尺度を用いた質問項目では、自己効力感の四つの潜在的構成要素(教授法、テクノロジー、コミュニカティブ・ランゲージティーチング、自己管理)を調べた。加えて、これらの構成要素間の相関関係を調べ、さらに潜在構成要素と教員層データがオンライン授業全体に対する自己効力感にどの程度影響するのか分析を行った。結果、英語教員はオンライン授業に対しての自己効力感が高いことが明らかになった。教員がテクノロジーに対して高い自己効力感を持ったものの、自己管理、特に時間の利用に対しては自己効力感が低かった。また回帰分析では、四つの構成要素は英語教員の全体的な自己効力感を説明するが、教員層データは影響を及ぼさないことがわかった。
This article suggests three teaching ideas to help L2 learners improve speaking performances through form-focused instruction using formulaic language. Formulaic language is considered an effective way to foster speaking fluency because prefabricated chunks are faster to retrieve than constructing sentences word by word (Wray, 2002). In spite of the benefits of learning formulaic language in L2 learning theory, few empirical studies were found which examined the effects of formulaic language instruction in intact classrooms, in particular in the EFL (English as a Foreign Language) context. By introducing some effective classroom tasks to foster L2 learners’ speaking fluency focusing on formulaic language in this article, the author emphasizes the need for empirical research involving EFL learners.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.