The variations in band shape with excited state energy found for the triplet metal to ligand charge transfer ((3)MLCT) emission spectra of ruthenium-bipyridine (Ru-bpy) chromophores at 77 K have been postulated to arise from excited state/excited state configurational mixing. This issue is more critically examined through the determination of the excited state energy dependence of the radiative rate constants (kRAD) for these emissions. Experimental values for kRAD were determined relative to known literature references for Ru-bpy complexes. When the lowest energy excited states are metal centered, kRAD can be anomalously small and such complexes have been identified using density functional theory (DFT) modeling. When such complexes are removed from the energy correlation, there is a strong (3)MLCT energy-dependent contribution to kRAD in addition to the expected classical energy cubed factor for complexes with excited state energies greater than 10 000 cm(-1). This correlates with the DFT calculations which show significant excited state electronic delocalization between a π(bpy-orbital) and a half-filled dπ*-(Ru(III)-orbital) for Ru-bpy complexes with (3)MLCT excited state energies greater than about 16 000 cm(-1). Overall, this work implicates the "stealing" of emission bandshapes as well as intensity from the higher energy, strongly allowed bpy-centered singlet ππ* excited state.

The heretofore unknown emission properties of the metal-to-ligand charge-transfer (MLCT) excited states of several complexes with (ruthenium)(monodentate aromatic ligand, MDA) chromophores are given. Emission spectra and lifetimes in 77 K glasses are reported for several monometallic complexes of the type [Ru(NH3)(5-n)(L)(n)(MDA)](2+) and two bimetallic pyrazine (pz)-bridged [{Ru(NH3)(4-n)(L)(n)}2pz](4+) complexes (L = pz, pyridine, or a multipyridine ligand; MDA = pz or a substituted pyridine, Y-py). The emission maxima occur in the visible and near-IR spectral regions and have much more poorly resolved vibronic sidebands than do related complexes with Ru-bpy chromophores, and the excited-state lifetimes are characteristic of Ru-bpy MLCT excited states in this energy range. The emission yields of trans-[Ru(NH3)4(MDA)(pz)](2+) (MDA = py or pz) are less than 0.2%, and combined with the other observations, this implies that most of the excited-state quenching occurs in high-energy excited states whose population precedes that of the lowest-energy (3)MLCT excited state. The pz-bridged, bimetallic complexes have mixed-valence excited states, and they absorb and emit at lower energies than their monometallic analogues do.

This is the first report of the 77 K triplet metal-to-ligand charge-transfer ((3)MLCT) emission spectra of pentaammine-MDA-ruthenium(II) ([Ru(NH3)5(MDA)](2+)) complexes, where MDA is a monodentate aromatic ligand. The emission spectra of these complexes and of the related trans-[Ru(NH3)4(MDA) (MDA')](2+) complexes are closely related, and their emission intensities are very weak. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations indicate that the energies of the lowest (3)MLCT excited states of Ru-MDA complexes are either similar to or lower than those of the lowest energy metal-centered excited states ((3)MC(X(Y))), that the barrier to internal conversion at 77 K is large compared to kBT, and that the (3)MC(X(Y)) excited states are weakly bound. The [Ru(NH3)5py](2+) complex is an exception to the general pattern: emission has been observed for the [Ru(ND3)5(d5-py)](2+) complex, but its lifetime is apparently very short. DFT modeling indicates that the excited state distortions of the different (3)MC excited states are very large and are in both Ru-ligand bonds along a single Cartesian axis for each different (3)MC excited state, nominally resulting in (3)MC(X(Y)), (3)MC((X)Y), and (3)MC(Z) lowest energy metal-centered states. The (3)MC(X(Y)) and (3)MC((X)Y) states appear to be the pseudo-Jahn-Teller distorted components of a (3)MC((XY)) state. The (3)MC(X(Y)) states are distorted up to 0.5 Å in each H3N-Ru-NH3 bond along a single Cartesian axis in the pentaammine and trans-tetraammine complexes, whereas the (3)MC(Z) states are found to be dissociative. DFT modeling of the (3)MLCT excited state of [Ru(NH3)5(py)](2+) indicates that the Ru center has a spin density of 1.24 at the (3)MLCT energy minimum and that the (3)MLCT → (3)MC(Z) crossing is smooth with a very small barrier (<0.5 kcal/mol) along the D3N-Ru-py distortion coordinate, implying strong (3)MLCT/(3)MC excited state configurational mixing. Furthermore, the DFT modeling indicates that the long-lived intermediate observed in earlier flash photolysis studies of [Ru(NH3)5py](2+) is a Ru(II)-(η(2)(C═C)-py) species.

The lowest energy metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MLCT) absorption bands found in ambient solutions of a series of [Ru(tpy)(bpy)X](m+) complexes (tpy = 2,2':3',2''-terpyridine; bpy = 2,2'-bipyridine; and X = a monodentate ancillary ligand) feature one or two partly resolved weak absorptions (bands I and/or II) on the low energy side of their absorption envelopes. Similar features are found for the related cyanide-bridged bi- and trimetallic complexes. However, the weak absorption band I of [(bpy)(2)Ru{CNRu(tpy)(bpy)}(2)](4+) is missing in its [(bpy)(2)Ru{NCRu(tpy)(bpy)}(2)](4+) linkage isomer demonstrating that this feature arises from a Ru(II)/tpy MLCT absorption. The energies of the MLCT band I components of the [Ru(tpy)(bpy)X](m+) complexes are proportional to the differences between the potentials for the first oxidation and the first reduction waves of the complexes. Time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) computational modeling indicates that these band I components correspond to the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) to lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) transition, with the HOMO being largely ruthenium-centered and the LUMO largely tpy-centered. The most intense contribution to a lowest energy MLCT absorption envelope (band III) of these complexes corresponds to the convolution of several orbitally different components, and its absorption maximum has an energy that is about 5000 cm(-1) higher than that of band I. The multimetallic complexes that contain Ru(II) centers linked by cyanide have mixed valence excited states in which more than 10% of electronic density is delocalized between the nearest neighbor ruthenium centers, and the corresponding stabilization energy contributions in the excited states are indistinguishable from those of the corresponding ground states. Single crystal X-ray structures and computational modeling indicate that the Ru-(C≡N)-Ru linkage is quite flexible and that there is not an appreciable variation in electronic structure or energy among the conformational isomers.

Metal to ligand charge-transfer (MLCT) excited state emission quantum yields, ϕem, are reported in 77 K glasses for a series of pentaammine and tetraammine ruthenium(II) complexes with monodentate aromatic acceptor ligands (Ru-MDA) such as pyridine and pyrazine. These quantum yields are only about 0.2-1% of those found for their Ru-bpy (bpy = 2,2'-bipyridine) analogs in similar excited state energy ranges (hνem). The excited state energy dependencies of the emission intensity are characterized by mean radiative decay rate constants, kRAD, resolved from ϕem/τobs = kRAD (τobs = the observed emission decay lifetime; τobs(-1) = kRAD + kNRD; kNRD = nonradiative decay rate constant). Except for the Ru-pz chromophores in alcohol glasses, the values of kNRD for the Ru-MDA chromophores are slightly smaller, and their dependences on excited state energies are very similar to those of related Ru-bpy chromophores. In principle, one expects kRAD to be proportional to the product of (hνem)(3) and the square of the transition dipole moment (Me,g).(2) However, from experimental studies of Ru-bpy chromophores, an additional hνem dependence has been found that originates in an intensity stealing from a higher energy excited state with a much larger value of Me,g. This additional hνem dependence is not present in the kRAD energy dependence for Ru-MDA chromophores in the same energy regime. Intensity stealing in the phosphorescence of these complexes is necessary since the triplet-to-singlet transition is only allowed through spin-orbit coupling and since the density functional theory modeling implicates configurational mixing between states in the triplet spin manifold; this is treated by setting Me,g equal to the product of a mixing coefficient and the difference between the molecular dipole moments of the states involved, which implicates an experimental first order dependence of kRAD on hνem. The failure to observe intensity stealing for the Ru-MDA complexes suggests that their weak emissions are more typical of "pure" (or unmixed) (3)MLCT excited states.