No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

AimThe aim of this study is to compare the effect of lactated ringer (LR), vasopressin (Vaso) or terlipressin (Terli) on uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock (UHS) in rats.Methods48 rats were divided into four treatment groups for UHS study. Vaso group was given bolus vasopressin (0.8 U/kg); the Terli group was given bolus terlipressin (15 mcg/kg); LR group was given LR and the sham group was not given anything. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), serum lactate level, plasma cytokine levels, lung injury and mortality are investigated for these different treatment groups.ResultsCompared with LR group, vasopressin and terlipressin-treated groups were associated with higher MAP, lowered mortality rates, less lung injury, lowered serum lactate level, less proinflammatory and more anti-inflammatory cytokine production at certain time points. Comparing between vasopressin and terlipressin treated groups, there is no statistical difference in mortality rates, lung injury, serum lactate level and cytokine level. However, there is a difference in the length of time in maintaining a restored level of MAP (80 to 110 mmHg). The terlipressin treated rats can maintain this restored level of MAP for 45 minutes, but the vasopressin treated rats can only maintain this restored level of MAP for 5 minutes before decreasing gradually to the MAP observed in LR group (40 mmHg).ConclusionEarly optimization of hemodynamics with terlipressin or vasopressin in an animal model of UHS was associated with improved hemodynamics and inflammatory cytokine profile than the LR control. Compared with vasopressin, terlipressin has the advantage of ease of use and sustained effects.

OBJECTIVES: Existing studies evaluating the accuracy of heparin-binding protein for the diagnosis of sepsis have been inconsistent. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the totality of current evidence regarding the utility of heparin-binding protein to diagnose sepsis in patients with presumed systemic infection. DATA SOURCE: PubMed, Embase, the China National Knowledge infrastructure, and WangFang electronic database were searched from inception to December of 2019. STUDY SELECTION: Two independent reviewers identified eligible studies. Cohort and case-control studies, which measured serum levels of heparin-binding protein among adult patients with suspected sepsis, were eligible for inclusion. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently extracted data elements from the selected studies. A bivariate random-effects meta-analysis model was used to synthesize the prognostic accuracy measures. Risk of bias of studies was assessed with Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. DATA SYNTHESIS: We identified 26 studies with 3,868 patients in the meta-analysis. Heparin-binding protein had a pooled sensitivity of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.79–0.90) and a pooled specificity of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.82–0.96) for the diagnosis of sepsis. There was low heterogeneity between the studies (I 2 = 12%), and no evidence of publication bias was detected. Heparin-binding protein had a higher sensitivity and specificity when compared with procalcitonin (0.75 [95% CI, 0.62–0.85] and 0.85 [95% CI, 0.73–0.92]) as well as C-reactive protein (0.75 [95% CI, 0.65–0.84] and 0.71 [95% CI, 0.63–0.77]). Serial measurements of heparin-binding protein also showed that heparin-binding protein levels rose significantly at least 24 hours before a diagnosis of sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic ability of heparin-binding protein is favorable, demonstrating both high sensitivity and specificity in predicting progression to sepsis in critically ill patients. Future studies could assess the incremental value that heparin-binding protein may add to a multimodal sepsis identification and prognostication algorithm for critically ill patients.