Abstract:Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is widely used to predict wind conditions for wind energy production purposes. However, as wind power development expands into areas of even more complex terrain and challenging flow conditions, more research is needed to investigate the ability of such models to describe turbulent flow features. In this study, the performance of a hybrid Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS)/Large Eddy Simulation (LES) model in highly complex terrain has been investigated. The model was compared with measurements from a long range pulsed Lidar, which first were validated with sonic anemometer data. The accuracy of the Lidar was considered to be sufficient for validation of flow model turbulence estimates. By reducing the range gate length of the Lidar a slight additional improvement in accuracy was obtained, but the availability of measurements was reduced due to the increased noise floor in the returned signal. The DES model was able to capture the variations of velocity and turbulence along the line-of-sight of the Lidar beam but overestimated the turbulence level in regions of complex flow.
A numerical model describing the ballistic behavior of a commercially used initiator is presented in this article. This model was built on the principle of conservation of mass and energy in the multi-phase framework incorporated with multi-loaded conditions. After obtaining the information about the grain size distribution in each composite, a fixing factor was proposed based on the surface area ratio of the composites. Thus, the solid propellant burning process based on distributed grain size was described, and the burn rate parameters of the applied pyrotechnic compositions were re-evaluated for different preconditioned temperature levels according to Vieille’s law. The influence of bridge wire and initiator metal cap was further modeled concerning their characteristic properties according to the observed measurements. The validation of the entire initiator model in the closed bomb test showed quantitative agreement with the measured pressure evolution, while the parameter study for evaluating the ballistic sensitivity of each component delivered some insights into the product development process. Furthermore, the configuration of a cold gas inflator was utilized to evaluate the initiator impact for a realistic application, where the shock wave intensity during deployment serves the main function in the inflator design. Incorporated with CFD simulations to capture the shock wave propagation, 0D-3D coupling strategy for initiator ballistics to inflator configuration was realized. Besides, the simulation results reflected the physical conditions in a proper manner. In particular, the parameter study led to a better understanding of interactions between inflator components, which were barely possible to be quantified through the measurements. The proposed initiator model could also be used in combination with other mechanical principles as a component of pyrotechnic devices such as pin-puller, electric line cutters, or airbag inflators. The detailed information gained in describing the physical properties enabled us to assess the existing design quantitatively and to have better control of the product quality.
<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">A competent numerical prediction on automotive restraint systems relies on accurate inflator characteristics as input data, which are specified to gas species composition, mass, and energy flow rate. Due to the highly transient processes under extreme temperature conditions of inflator deployment, the determination of inflator characteristics is very challenging. Current conventional methods utilizing tank pressure (Pt method) and/or chamber pressure (Pc-thrust method) measurements obtain numerous assumptions, for which their compatibility with the applied inflator type is often not considered.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">In this work, conventional Pt and Pc-thrust methods are detailed, assessed, and discussed. One stored gas and two pyrotechnic inflators are taken as scenarios, for which the interior ballistic models are created based on their design components and functions. The created inflator features are compared between the three methods. Further, validations are carried out in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation on the tank test and finite element method (FEM) simulation on the Force INdicating Assessment Tool (FINAL) ton test.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">Results of the tank test and FINAL ton validation show different evaluations of the input data, which refers to a fundamental bias in interpreting and utilizing the inflator characteristics. The mismatch behavior between the two test environments reveals the inadequacy of using the information of the tank test as a single data source for airbag-relevant simulations. By assessing the applied assumptions in the conventional methodologies, it has turned out that the conventional methods are only appropriate for pyrotechnic-type inflators. Thus, the numerical ballistic approach is advised for stored gas–type inflators instead of conventional methods. Also, cross-validation is recommended for pyrotechnic inflators to adjust the gas amount and temperature level before the complex simulation takes place. These insights contribute not only to a better understanding of the inflator gas thermodynamics but also provide a general guideline for simulation engineers in acquiring more reliable solution in the restraint system development framework.</div></div>
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.